|
|
||||||||
1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
2 Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
3 Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
4 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
Reprint requests to: Dr. Stephen L. Mayo, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 14775, Pasadena, California 91125, USA; e-mail: steve{at}mayo.caltech.edu; fax (626) 568-0934.
The solution structures of two computationally designed core variants of the ß1 domain of streptococcal protein G (Gß1) were solved by 1H NMR methods to assess the robustness of amino acid sequence selection by the ORBIT protein design package under changes in protein backbone specification. One variant has mutations at three of 10 core positions and corresponds to minimal perturbations of the native Gß1 backbone. The other, with mutations at six of 10 positions, was calculated for a backbone in which the separation between Gß1's
-helix and ß-sheet was increased by 15% relative to native Gß1. Exchange broadening of some resonances and the complete absence of others in spectra of the sixfold mutant bespeak conformational heterogeneity in this protein. The NMR data were sufficiently abundant, however, to generate structures of similar, moderately high quality for both variants. Both proteins adopt backbone structures similar to their target folds. Moreover, the sequence selection algorithm successfully predicted all core
1 angles in both variants, five of six
2 angles in the threefold mutant and four of seven
2 angles in the sixfold mutant. We conclude that ORBIT calculates sequences that fold specifically to a geometry close to the template, even when the template is moderately perturbed relative to a naturally occurring structure. There are apparently limits to the size of acceptable perturbations: In this study, the larger perturbation led to undesired dynamic behavior.
Keywords: Protein design; backbone design; core sidechain packing; dead-end elimination; ORBIT
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Crowhurst and S. L. Mayo NMR-detected conformational exchange observed in a computationally designed variant of protein G{beta}1 Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 2008; 21(9): 577 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Taylor, H. K. Fung, R. Rajgaria, M. Filizola, H. Weinstein, and C. A. Floudas Mutations Affecting the Oligomerization Interface of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Revealed by a Novel De Novo Protein Design Framework Biophys. J., April 1, 2008; 94(7): 2470 - 2481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Fung, C. A. Floudas, M. S. Taylor, L. Zhang, and D. Morikis Toward Full-Sequence De Novo Protein Design with Flexible Templates for Human Beta-Defensin-2 Biophys. J., January 15, 2008; 94(2): 584 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |