Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luong, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luong, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Protein Science (2001), 10:581-591.
Copyright © 2001 The Protein Society

A general method for the quantitative analysis of functional chimeras: Applications from site-directed mutagenesis and macromolecular association

Tinh N. Luong1 and Jack F. Kirsch

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720–3206, USA

Reprint requests to: Dr. Jack F. Kirsch, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720–3206, USA; e-mail: jfkirsch{at}uclink4.berkeley.edu; fax: (510) 642-6368.

Two new parameters, I and C, are introduced for the quantitative evaluation of functional chimeras: I (impact) and C (context dependence) are the free energy difference and sum, respectively, of the effects on a given property measured in forward and retro chimeras. The forward chimera is made by substitution of a part "a" from ensemble A into the analogous position of homologous ensemble B (SB -> A). The C value is a measure of the interaction of the interrogated position with its surroundings, whereas I is an expression of the quantitative importance of the probed position. Both I and C vary with the evaluated property, for example, kinetics, binding, thermostability, and so forth. The retro chimera is the reverse substitution of the analogous part "b" from B into A, SA -> B. The I and C values derived from original data for forward and retro mutations in aspartate and tyrosine aminotransferase, from literature data for quasi domain exchange in oncomodulin and for the interaction of Tat with bovine and human TAR are evaluated. The most salient derived conclusions are, first, that Thr 109 (AATase) or Ser 109 (TATase) is an important discriminator for dicarboxylic acid selectivity by these two enzymes (I < -2.9 kcal/mol). The T109S mutation in AATase produces a nearly equal and opposite effect to S109T in TATase (C < 0.4 kcal/mol). Second, an I value of 5.5 kcal/mol describes the effects of mirror mutations D94S (site 1) and S55D (site 2) in the Ca2+ binding sites of oncomodulin on Ca2+ affinity. The second mirror set, G98D (site 1) and D59G (site 2), yields a smaller impact (I = -3.4 kcal/mol) on Ca2+ binding; however, the effect is significantly more nearly context independent (C = -0.6 versus C = -2.7 kcal/mol). Third, the stem and loop regions of HIV and BIV TAR are predominantly responsible for the species specific interaction with BIV Tat65–81 (I = -1.5 to -1.6 kcal/mol), whereas I = 0.1 kcal/mol for bulge TAR chimeras. The C values are from -0.3 to -1.2 kcal/mol. The analysis described should have important applications to protein design.

Keywords: Aminotransferase; chimera; context dependence; macromolecular interactions; protein/genetic engineering; oncomodulin; Tat/TAR

Abbreviations: PLP, pyridoxal-5'-phosphate • {alpha}-KG, {alpha}-ketoglutarate • AATase, aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1) • TATase, tyrosine aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.5) • MDH, malate dehydrogenase • OAA, oxaloacetate • PMP, pyridoxamine-5'-phosphate • HO-HxoDH, 2-hydroxyisocaproate (i.e. 2-hydroxy-4-methyl-pentanoate) dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.-) • Hca, hydrocinnamate • HIV, human immunodeficiency virus • BIV, bovine immunodeficiency virus • TAR, trans-activation response element • Tat, trans-activator of transcription • HEX, a hexamutant of AATase with the following six substitutions V39L/K41Y/T47I/N69L/T109S/N297S


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
S. C. Rothman, M. Voorhies, and J. F. Kirsch
Directed evolution relieves product inhibition and confers in vivo function to a rationally designed tyrosine aminotransferase
Protein Sci., March 1, 2004; 13(3): 763 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
W. A. Shaffer, T. N. Luong, S. C. Rothman, and J. F. Kirsch
Quantitative chimeric analysis of six specificity determinants that differentiate Escherichia coli aspartate from tyrosine aminotransferase
Protein Sci., December 1, 2002; 11(12): 2848 - 2859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
E. Deu, K. A. Koch, and J. F. Kirsch
The role of the conserved Lys68*:Glu265 intersubunit salt bridge in aspartate aminotransferase kinetics: Multiple forced covariant amino acid substitutions in natural variants
Protein Sci., May 1, 2002; 11(5): 1062 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The Protein Society.