Protein Science Sheba protein
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Re, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Re, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Protein Science (2002), 11:2644-2654.
Copyright © 2002 The Protein Society

Genetic analysis of response regulator activation in bacterial chemotaxis suggests an intermolecular mechanism

Sandra Da Re, Tatiana Tolstykh, Peter M. Wolanin and Jeffry B. Stock

Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

Reprint requests to: Jeffry Stock, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; e-mail: jstock{at}princeton.edu; fax: (609) 258-6175.

Response regulator proteins of two-component systems are usually activated by phosphorylation. The phosphorylated response regulator protein CheY~P mediates the chemotaxis response in Escherichia coli. We performed random mutagenesis and selected CheY mutants that are constitutively active in the absence of phosphorylation. Although a single amino acid substitution can lead to constitutive activation, no single DNA base change can effect such a transition. Numerous different sets of mutations that activate in synergy were selected in several different combinations. These mutations were all located on the side of CheY defined by {alpha}4, ß5, {alpha}5, and {alpha}1. Our findings argue against the two-state hypothesis for response regulator activation. We propose an alternative intermolecular mechanism that involves a dynamic interplay between response regulators and their effector targets.

Keywords: CheY; Escherichia coli; random mutagenesis; two-component systems; chemotaxis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. M. Stock and J. Guhaniyogi
A New Perspective on Response Regulator Activation
J. Bacteriol., November 1, 2006; 188(21): 7328 - 7330.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
R. Gao, A. Mukhopadhyay, F. Fang, and D. G. Lynn
Constitutive Activation of Two-Component Response Regulators: Characterization of VirG Activation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2006; 188(14): 5204 - 5211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Goymer, S. G. Kahn, J. G. Malone, S. M. Gehrig, A. J. Spiers, and P. B. Rainey
Adaptive Divergence in Experimental Populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. II. Role of the GGDEF Regulator WspR in Evolution and Development of the Wrinkly Spreader Phenotype
Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 515 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The Protein Society.