| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
2 W.M. Keck Center for Computational Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
3 Department of Biochemistry and Biology Science, The University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
4 Department of Chemistry, The University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
Reprint requests to: Liskin Swint-Kruse, Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, MS-140, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA; e-mail: lsk{at}bioc.rice.edu; fax: (713) 348-6149.
LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow "dimerization" through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge•hinge` interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1–62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for fine-tuning individual repressor function.
Keywords: Allostery; hinge domain; repressor; induction; LacI; PurR; molecular dynamics
Abbreviations: LacI, lactose repressor protein • PurR, purine repressor protein • HTH, helix-turn-helix structure of LacI/PurR DNA binding domains • ONPF, o-nitrophenyl-ß-D-fucopyranoside • IPTG, isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside • MD, molecular dynamics
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Resch, H. Striegl, E. M. Henssler, M. Sevvana, C. Egerer-Sieber, E. Schiltz, W. Hillen, and Y. A. Muller A protein functional leap: how a single mutation reverses the function of the transcription regulator TetR Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2008; 36(13): 4390 - 4401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Swint-Kruse and C. S. Brown Resmap: automated representation of macromolecular interfaces as two-dimensional networks Bioinformatics, August 1, 2005; 21(15): 3327 - 3328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. C. Flynn, L. Swint-Kruse, Y. Kong, C. Booth, K. S. Matthews, and J. Ma Allosteric transition pathways in the lactose repressor protein core domains: Asymmetric motions in a homodimer Protein Sci., November 1, 2003; 12(11): 2523 - 2541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
