Protein Science Attend a BioResearch Product Faire
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waldron, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waldron, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, K. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Protein Science (2003), 12:871-874.
Copyright © 2003 The Protein Society

Anion binding to a protein–protein complex lacks dependence on net charge

Travis T. Waldron, Modestos A. Modestou and Kenneth P. Murphy

University of Iowa, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA

Reprint requests to: Kenneth P. Murphy, Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; e-mail: k-murphy{at}uiowa.edu; fax: (319) 335-9570.

The binding of anions to proteins occurs in numerous physiological and metabolic processes. In an effort to understand the factors important in these interactions, we have studied the weak binding of phosphate and sulfate to a protein–protein complex using isothermal titration calorimetry. To our knowledge, this is the first system in which the thermodynamics of anion binding have been determined calorimetrically. By studying both phosphate and sulfate binding and using a range of pH values, the charge on the anion was varied from ~ -1 to -2. Surprisingly, no dependence of the binding energetics on the charge of the anion was observed. This result indicates that charge–charge interactions are not the dominant factor in binding and suggests the importance of hydrogen bonding in specifically recognizing and coordinating anions.

Keywords: Anion; binding; electrostatics; charge–charge; hydrogen bonding


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The Protein Society.