|
|
||||||||
1 Biochemistry Department, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
2 Center for Information Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
3 School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA
4 Biochemistry Department, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Reprint requests to: David K. Smith, Biochemistry Department, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong; e-mail: dsmith{at}hkusua.hku.hk; fax: (852) 28551254.
Protein molecules exhibit varying degrees of flexibility throughout their three-dimensional structures, with some segments showing little mobility while others may be so disordered as to be unresolvable by techniques such as X-ray crystallography. Atomic displacement parameters, or B-factors, from X-ray crystallographic studies give an experimentally determined indication of the degree of mobility in a protein structure. To provide better estimators of amino acid flexibility, we have examined B-factors from a large set of high-resolution crystal structures. Because of the differences among structures, it is necessary to normalize the B-factors. However, many proteins have segments of unusually high mobility, which must be accounted for before normalization can be performed. Accordingly, a median-based method from quality control studies was used to identify outliers. After removal of outliers from, and normalization of, each protein chain, the B-factors were collected for each amino acid in the set. It was found that the distribution of normalized B-factors followed a Gumbel, or extreme value distribution, and the location parameter, or mode, of this distribution was used as an estimator of flexibility for the amino acid. These new parameters have a higher correlation with experimentally determined B-factors than parameters from earlier methods.
Keywords: B-factor; atomic displacement parameter; Gumbel distribution; extreme value distribution; flexibility
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Pandini, G. Mauri, A. Bordogna, and L. Bonati Detecting similarities among distant homologous proteins by comparison of domain flexibilities Protein Eng. Des. Sel., June 30, 2007; (2007) gzm021v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Otero-Cruz, C. A. Baez-Pagan, I. M. Caraballo-Gonzalez, and J. A. Lasalde-Dominicci Tryptophan-scanning Mutagenesis in the {alpha}M3 Transmembrane Domain of the Muscle-type Acetylcholine Receptor: A SPRING MODEL REVEALED J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 9162 - 9171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bhalla, G. B. Storchan, C. M. MacCarthy, V. N. Uversky, and O. Tcherkasskaya Local Flexibility in Molecular Function Paradigm Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2006; 5(7): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Asada, M. Sawano, K. Ogasahara, J. Nakamura, M. Ota, C. Kuroishi, M. Sugahara, K. Yutani, and N. Kunishima Stabilization Mechanism of the Tryptophan Synthase {alpha}-Subunit from Thermus thermophilus HB8: X-Ray Crystallographic Analysis and Calorimetry J. Biochem., October 1, 2005; 138(4): 343 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Radivojac, Z. Obradovic, D. K. Smith, G. Zhu, S. Vucetic, C. J. Brown, J. D. Lawson, and A. K. Dunker Protein flexibility and intrinsic disorder Protein Sci., January 1, 2004; 13(1): 71 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mohan, N. Sinha, and S. J. Smith-Gill Modeling the Binding Sites of Anti-Hen Egg White Lysozyme Antibodies HyHEL-8 and HyHEL-26: An Insight into the Molecular Basis of Antibody Cross-Reactivity and Specificity Biophys. J., November 1, 2003; 85(5): 3221 - 3236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |