|
|
||||||||
Howard Hughes Medical Institute Center for Single Molecule Biophysics, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA
Reprint requests to: Yaoqi Zhou, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Center for Single Molecule Biophysics and Department of Physiology & Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, 124 Sherman Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; e-mail: yqzhou{at}buffalo.edu; fax: 716-829-2344.
Helices in membrane spanning regions are more tightly packed than the helices in soluble proteins. Thus, we introduce a method that uses a simple scale of burial propensity and a new algorithm to predict transmembrane helical (TMH) segments and a positive-inside rule to predict amino-terminal orientation. The method (the topology predictor of transmembrane helical proteins using mean burial propensity [THUMBUP]) correctly predicted the topology of 55 of 73 proteins (or 75%) with known three-dimensional structures (the 3D helix database). This level of accuracy can be reached by MEMSAT 1.8 (a 200-parameter model-recognition method) and a new HMM-based method (a 111-parameter hidden Markov model, UMDHMMTMHP) if they were retrained with the 73-protein database. Thus, a method based on a physiochemical property can provide topology prediction as accurate as those methods based on more complicated statistical models and learning algorithms for the proteins with accurately known structures. Commonly used HMM-based methods and MEMSAT 1.8 were trained with a combination of the partial 3D helix database and a 1D helix database of TMH proteins in which topology information were obtained by gene fusion and other experimental techniques. These methods provide a significantly poorer prediction for the topology of TMH proteins in the 3D helix database. This suggests that the 1D helix database, because of its inaccuracy, should be avoided as either a training or testing database. A Web server of THUMBUP and UMDHMMTMHP is established for academic users at http://www.smbs.buffalo.edu/phys_bio/service.htm. The 3D helix database is also available from the same Web site.
Keywords: Transmembrane protein topology; burial propensity; topology prediction; hydrophobicity scale
Abbreviations: THUMBUP, topology predictor of transmembrane helical proteins using mean burial propensity UMDHMMTMHP, University of Maryland hidden Markov model for transmembrane helical protein MSR, membrane spanning regions
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-J. Han and S. Y. Lee The Escherichia coli Proteome: Past, Present, and Future Prospects Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2006; 70(2): 362 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhou, C. Zhang, S. Liu, and Y. Zhou Web-based toolkits for topology prediction of transmembrane helical proteins, fold recognition, structure and binding scoring, folding-kinetics analysis and comparative analysis of domain combinations Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W193 - W197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Carter, S. Pan, J. Zouhar, E. L. Avila, T. Girke, and N. V. Raikhel The Vegetative Vacuole Proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana Reveals Predicted and Unexpected Proteins PLANT CELL, December 1, 2004; 16(12): 3285 - 3303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Egelund, M. Skjot, N. Geshi, P. Ulvskov, and B. L. Petersen A Complementary Bioinformatics Approach to Identify Potential Plant Cell Wall Glycosyltransferase-Encoding Genes Plant Physiology, September 1, 2004; 136(1): 2609 - 2620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Viklund and A. Elofsson Best {alpha}-helical transmembrane protein topology predictions are achieved using hidden Markov models and evolutionary information Protein Sci., July 1, 2004; 13(7): 1908 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |