Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vakser, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vakser, I. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Protein Science (2003), 12:1646-1651.
Copyright © 2003 The Protein Society

The role of geometric complementarity in secondary structure packing: A systematic docking study

Sulin Jiang1, Andrei Tovchigrechko2 and Ilya A. Vakser2

1 Department of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021, USA
2 Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-3600, USA

Reprint requests to: Ilya A. Vakser, Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3600, USA; e-mail: vakser{at}ams.sunysb.edu; fax: (631) 632-8490.

A strong similarity between the major aspects of protein folding and protein recognition is one of the emerging fundamental principles in protein science. A crucial importance of steric complementarity in protein recognition is a well-established fact. The goal of this study was to assess the importance of the steric complementarity in protein folding, namely, in the packing of the secondary structure elements. Although the tight packing of protein structures, in general, is a well-known fact, a systematic study of the role of geometric complementarity in the packing of secondary structure elements has been lacking. To assess the role of the steric complementarity, we used a docking procedure to recreate the crystallographically determined packing of secondary structure elements in known protein structures by using the geometric match only. The docking results revealed a significant percentage of correctly predicted packing configurations. Different types of pairs of secondary structure elements showed different degrees of steric complementarity (from high to low: ß–ß, loop–loop, {alpha}{alpha}, and {alpha}–ß). Interestingly, the relative contribution of the steric match in different types of pairs was correlated with the number of such pairs in known protein structures. This effect may indicate an evolutionary pressure to select tightly packed elements of secondary structure to maximize the packing of the entire structure. The overall conclusion is that the steric match plays an essential role in the packing of secondary structure elements. The results are important for better understanding of principles of protein structure and may facilitate development of better methods for protein structure prediction.

Keywords: Docking; protein modeling; molecular recognition; protein folding; structural bioinformatics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T.-W. Nam, H. I. Jung, Y. J. An, Y.-H. Park, S. H. Lee, Y.-J. Seok, and S.-S. Cha
Analyses of Mlc-IIBGlc interaction and a plausible molecular mechanism of Mlc inactivation by membrane sequestration
PNAS, March 11, 2008; 105(10): 3751 - 3756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Guharoy and P. Chakrabarti
Secondary structure based analysis and classification of biological interfaces: identification of binding motifs in protein protein interactions
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2007; 23(15): 1909 - 1918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. D. Gaffin, K. Gokulan, J. C. Sacchettini, T. E. Hewett, R. Klevitsky, J. Robbins, V. Sarin, D. C. Zawieja, G. A. Meininger, and M. Muthuchamy
Changes in end-to-end interactions of tropomyosin affect mouse cardiac muscle dynamics
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H552 - H563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Tovchigrechko and I. A. Vakser
GRAMM-X public web server for protein-protein docking.
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2006; 34(Web Server issue): W310 - W314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
S. Jiang and I. A. Vakser
Shorter side chains optimize helix-helix packing
Protein Sci., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 1426 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The Protein Society.