Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 6, 2004, 10.1110/ps.04702104
Protein Science (2004), 13:2244-2251. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2004 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.04702104v1
13/8/2244    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slutsky, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, E. N. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slutsky, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, E. N. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Cation–{pi} interactions studied in a model coiled-coil peptide

Morris M. Slutsky and E. Neil G. Marsh

Department of Chemistry and Division of Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

(RECEIVED February 19, 2004; FINAL REVISION April 20, 2004; ACCEPTED April 20, 2004)

Cation–{pi} interactions between aromatic amino acids and the positively charged residues lysine and arginine have been proposed to play an important role in stabilizing protein structure. We have used a peptide that adopts a coiled coil structure as a model system to evaluate the energetic contribution of cation–{pi} interactions to protein folding. Peptides were designed in which phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan were placed at a solvent-exposed position of the helix, one turn removed from an arginine residue that could provide a favorable cation–{pi} interaction. Only the arginine–phenylalanine pairing provided significant stabilization of the peptide structure and it appears that hydrophobic packing, rather than the cation–{pi} effect, is more likely to be responsible for the stability of this peptide. We conclude that any stabilizing effect of cation–{pi} interactions in these peptides is much smaller than that predicted from computational studies.

Keywords: de novo designed proteins; protein stability; {alpha} helix; cation-{pi}


Reprint requests to: E. Neil G. Marsh, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; e-mail: nmarsh{at}umich.edu; fax: (734) 615-3790.

Supplemental material: see www.proteinscience.org

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.04702104.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Kniazeff, L. Shi, C. J. Loland, J. A. Javitch, H. Weinstein, and U. Gether
An Intracellular Interaction Network Regulates Conformational Transitions in the Dopamine Transporter
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 17691 - 17701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. J. VandenBussche, S. Dakshanamurthy, P. E. Posch, and C. K. Hurley
A Single Polymorphism Disrupts the Killer Ig-Like Receptor 2DL2/2DL3 D1 Domain
J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 5347 - 5357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The Protein Society.