|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Ontario Cancer Institute and Department of Medical Biophysics,
2 Department of Biochemistry,
3 Structural Genomics Consortium, and
4 Department of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
6 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
7 Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom
8 School of Biochemistry and Microbiology and Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
9 Department of Biochemistry, Umea University, S-901 87 Umea, Sweden
10 Department of Chemistry, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
11 Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
12 Dipartimento di Scienze Biochimiche, Universita degli Studi di Firenze, 50134 Firenze, Italy
13 Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
14 Institute of Molecular Biology, Department of Protein Chemistry, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
15 Laboratory of Biochemistry, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
16 Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
17 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg D-69012 Germany
18 Biochemistry and Cell Biology Department and Chemistry Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251, USA
19 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
(RECEIVED October 28, 2004; FINAL REVISION November 26, 2004; ACCEPTED November 26, 2004)
Recent years have seen the publication of both empirical and theoretical relationships predicting the rates with which proteins fold. Our ability to test and refine these relationships has been limited, however, by a variety of difficulties associated with the comparison of folding and unfolding rates, thermodynamics, and structure across diverse sets of proteins. These difficulties include the wide, potentially confounding range of experimental conditions and methods employed to date and the difficulty of obtaining correct and complete sequence and structural details for the characterized constructs. The lack of a single approach to data analysis and error estimation, or even of a common set of units and reporting standards, further hinders comparative studies of folding. In an effort to overcome these problems, we define here a "consensus" set of experimental conditions (25°C at pH 7.0, 50 mM buffer), data analysis methods, and data reporting standards that we hope will provide a benchmark for experimental studies. We take the first step in this initiative by describing the folding kinetics of 30 apparently two-state proteins or protein domains under the consensus conditions. The goal of our efforts is to set uniform standards for the experimental community and to initiate an accumulating, self-consistent data set that will aid ongoing efforts to understand the folding process.
Keywords: two-state; protein folding; kinetics; chevron plots; equilibrium
Abbreviations: GuHCl, guanidine hydrochloride tris, tris hydroxymethylaminoethane HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid TCEP, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine CD, circular dichroism
Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.041205405.
Reprint requests to: Kevin W. Plaxco, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; e-mail: kwp{at}chem.ucsb.edu; fax: (805) 893-4120.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. S. Bogatyreva, A. A. Osypov, and D. N. Ivankov KineticDB: a database of protein folding kinetics Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2008; (2008) gkn696v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Hamadani and S. Weiss Nonequilibrium Single Molecule Protein Folding in a Coaxial Mixer Biophys. J., July 1, 2008; 95(1): 352 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Caldinelli, S. Iametti, A. Barbiroli, D. Fessas, F. Bonomi, L. Piubelli, G. Molla, and L. Pollegioni Relevance of the flavin binding to the stability and folding of engineered cholesterol oxidase containing noncovalently bound FAD Protein Sci., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 409 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Stump and L. M. Gloss Unique fluorophores in the dimeric archaeal histones hMfB and hPyA1 reveal the impact of nonnative structure in a monomeric kinetic intermediate Protein Sci., February 1, 2008; 17(2): 322 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Jaswal and A. D. Miranker Scope and utility of hydrogen exchange as a tool for mapping landscapes Protein Sci., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2378 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Istomin, D. J. Jacobs, and D. R. Livesay On the role of structural class of a protein with two-state folding kinetics in determining correlations between its size, topology, and folding rate Protein Sci., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2564 - 2569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Fulton, M. A. Bate, N. G. Faux, K. Mahmood, C. Betts, and A. M. Buckle Protein Folding Database (PFD 2.0): an online environment for the International Foldeomics Consortium Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D304 - D307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Geierhaas, A. A. Nickson, K. Lindorff-Larsen, J. Clarke, and M. Vendruscolo BPPred: A Web-based computational tool for predicting biophysical parameters of proteins Protein Sci., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 125 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ruczinski, T. R. Sosnick, and K. W. Plaxco Methods for the accurate estimation of confidence intervals on protein folding {varphi}-values. Protein Sci., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 2257 - 2264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wildes, L. M. Anderson, A. Sabogal, and S. Marqusee Native state energetics of the Src SH2 domain: Evidence for a partially structured state in the denatured ensemble Protein Sci., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1769 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Teilum, F. M. Poulsen, and M. Akke The inverted chevron plot measured by NMR relaxation reveals a native-like unfolding intermediate in acyl-CoA binding protein PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6877 - 6882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O. Lindberg, E. Haglund, I. A. Hubner, E. I. Shakhnovich, and M. Oliveberg Identification of the minimal protein-folding nucleus through loop-entropy perturbations PNAS, March 14, 2006; 103(11): 4083 - 4088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. De Los Rios, B.K. Muralidhara, D. Wildes, T. R. Sosnick, S. Marqusee, P. Wittung-Stafshede, K. W. Plaxco, and I. Ruczinski On the precision of experimentally determined protein folding rates and {phi}-values. Protein Sci., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 553 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Otzen Antagonism, non-native interactions and non-two-state folding in S6 revealed by double-mutant cycle analysis Protein Eng. Des. Sel., November 1, 2005; 18(11): 547 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Brockwell, G. S. Beddard, E. Paci, D. K. West, P. D. Olmsted, D. A. Smith, and S. E. Radford Mechanically Unfolding the Small, Topologically Simple Protein L Biophys. J., July 1, 2005; 89(1): 506 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |