Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 2, 2005, 10.1110/ps.041017305
Protein Science (2005), 14:653-662. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2005 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.041017305v1
14/3/653    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Protein aggregation determinants from a simplified model: Cooperative folders resist aggregation

Louis A. Clark1

(RECEIVED July 27, 2004; FINAL REVISION November 6, 2004; ACCEPTED November 11, 2004)

Two-chain aggregation simulations using minimalist models of proteins G, L, and mutants were used to investigate the fundamentals of protein aggregation. Mutations were selected to break up repeats of hydrophobic beads in the sequence while maintaining native topology and folding ability. Data are collected under conditions in which all chain types have similar folded populations and after equilibrating the separated chains to minimize competition between folding and aggregation. Folding cooperativity stands out as the best single-chain determinant under these conditions and for these simple models. It can be experimentally measured by the width of the unfolding transition during thermal denaturation and loosely related to population of intermediate-like states during folding. Additional measures of cooperativity and other properties such as radius of gyration fluctuations and patterning of hydrophobic residues are also examined. Initial contact system states with transition-state characteristics can be identified and are more expanded than average initial contact states. Two-chain minimalist model aggregates are considerably less structured than their native states and have minimal domain-swapping features.

Keywords: protein aggregation; aggregation oligomers; folding cooperativity; aggregate structure; protein simulation

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.041017305.


Reprint requests to: Louis A. Clark, Biogen Idec, Inc., Computational Drug Design Group, 14 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; e-mail: louie{at}alumni.northwestern.edu; fax: (617) 679-3208.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
T. M. Mezzasalma, J. K. Kranz, W. Chan, G. T. Struble, C. Schalk-Hihi, I. C. Deckman, B. A. Springer, and M. J. Todd
Enhancing Recombinant Protein Quality and Yield by Protein Stability Profiling
J Biomol Screen, April 1, 2007; 12(3): 418 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Cellmer, D. Bratko, J. M. Prausnitz, and H. Blanch
Protein-folding landscapes in multichain systems
PNAS, August 16, 2005; 102(33): 11692 - 11697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The Protein Society.