Protein Science Sheba protein
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Protein Science (2005), 14:765-774. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2005 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oelschlaeger, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pleiss, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oelschlaeger, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pleiss, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Impact of remote mutations on metallo-{beta}-lactamase substrate specificity: Implications for the evolution of antibiotic resistance

Peter Oelschlaeger1, Stephen L. Mayo2 and Juergen Pleiss3

1 Division of Biology and
2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Divisions of Biology and Chemistry/Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
3 Institute of Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

(RECEIVED September 1, 2004; FINAL REVISION October 19, 2004; ACCEPTED November 11, 2004)

Metallo-{beta}-lactamases have raised concerns due to their ability to hydrolyze a broad spectrum of {beta}-lactam antibiotics. The G262S point mutation distinguishing the metallo-{beta}-lactamase IMP-1 from IMP-6 has no effect on the hydrolysis of the drugs cephalothin and cefotaxime, but significantly improves catalytic efficiency toward cephaloridine, ceftazidime, benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, and imipenem. This change in specificity occurs even though residue 262 is remote from the active site. We investigated the substrate specificities of five other point mutants resulting from single-nucleotide substitutions at positions near residue 262: G262A, G262V, S121G, F218Y, and F218I. The results suggest two types of substrates: type I (nitrocefin, cephalothin, and cefotaxime), which are converted equally well by IMP-6, IMP-1, and G262A, but even more efficiently by the other mutants, and type II (ceftazidime, benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, and imipenem), which are hydrolyzed much less efficiently by all the mutants. G262V, S121G, F218Y, and F218I improve conversion of type I substrates, whereas G262A and IMP-1 improve conversion of type II substrates, indicating two distinct evolutionary adaptations from IMP-6. Substrate structure may explain the catalytic efficiencies observed. Type I substrates have R2 electron donors, which may stabilize the substrate intermediate in the binding pocket. In contrast, the absence of these stabilizing interactions with type II substrates may result in poor conversion. This observation may assist future drug design. As the G262A and F218Y mutants confer effective resistance to Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells (high minimal inhibitory concentrations), they are likely to evolve naturally.

Keywords: metallo-{beta}-lactamase; metalloenzyme; substrate specificity; enzyme evolution; point mutation

Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.041093405.


Reprint requests to: Juergen Pleiss, Institute of Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany; e-mail: Juergen.Pleiss{at}itb.uni-stuttgart.de; fax: +49-711-685-3196.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
O. Samuelsen, M. Castanheira, T. R. Walsh, and J. Spencer
Kinetic Characterization of VIM-7, a Divergent Member of the VIM Metallo-{beta}-Lactamase Family
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2008; 52(8): 2905 - 2908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. Walther-Rasmussen and N. Hoiby
Class A carbapenemases
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2007; 60(3): 470 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. E. Tomatis, R. M. Rasia, L. Segovia, and A. J. Vila
From the Cover: Mimicking natural evolution in metallo-{beta}-lactamases through second-shell ligand mutations
PNAS, September 27, 2005; 102(39): 13761 - 13766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The Protein Society.