Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 29, 2005, 10.1110/ps.051479505
Protein Science (2005), 14:1955-1963. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2005 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.051479505v1
14/8/1955    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kihara, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kihara, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins

Daisuke Kihara

Department of Biological Sciences/Computer Science, Markey Center for Structural Biology, The Bindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

(RECEIVED March 25, 2005; FINAL REVISION April 19, 2005; ACCEPTED April 19, 2005)

The influence of long-range residue interactions on defining secondary structure in a protein has long been discussed and is often cited as the current limitation to accurate secondary structure prediction. There are several experimental examples where a local sequence alone is not sufficient to determine its secondary structure, but a comprehensive survey on a large data set has not yet been done. Interestingly, some earlier studies denied the negative effect of long-range interactions on secondary structure prediction accuracy. Here, we have introduced the residue contact order (RCO), which directly indicates the separation of contacting residues in terms of the position in the sequence, and examined the relationship between the RCO and the prediction accuracy. A large data set of 2777 nonhomologous proteins was used in our analysis. Unlike previous studies, we do find that prediction accuracy drops as residues have contacts with more distant residues. Moreover, this negative correlation between the RCO and the prediction accuracy was found not only for {beta}-strands, but also for {alpha}-helices. The prediction accuracy of {beta}-strands is lower if residues have a high RCO or a low RCO, which corresponds to the situation that a {beta}-sheet is formed by {beta}-strands from different chains in a protein complex. The reason why the current study draws the opposite conclusion from the previous studies is examined. The implication for protein folding is also discussed.

Keywords: secondary structure prediction; long-range interaction; residue contact order; {beta}-strand formation

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.051479505.


Reprint requests to: Daisuke Kihara, Department of Biological Sciences/Computer Science, Markey Center for Structural Biology, The Bindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University, Lilly Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; e-mail: dkihara{at}purdue.edu; fax: (765) 496-1189.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
H. Cheng, T. Z. Sen, R. L. Jernigan, and A. Kloczkowski
Consensus Data Mining (CDM) Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Server: Combining GOR V and Fragment Database Mining (FDM)
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2007; 23(19): 2628 - 2630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
O. Zimmermann and U. H. E. Hansmann
Support vector machines for prediction of dihedral angle regions
Bioinformatics, December 15, 2006; 22(24): 3009 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
T. Z. Sen, H. Cheng, A. Kloczkowski, and R. L. Jernigan
A Consensus Data Mining secondary structure prediction by combining GOR V and Fragment Database Mining
Protein Sci., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2499 - 2506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
P. J. Fleming, H. Gong, and G. D. Rose
Secondary structure determines protein topology
Protein Sci., August 1, 2006; 15(8): 1829 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Gong, P. J. Fleming, and G. D. Rose
From The Cover: Building native protein conformation from highly approximate backbone torsion angles
PNAS, November 8, 2005; 102(45): 16227 - 16232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The Protein Society.