HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nayeem, A. Articles by Krystek, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nayeem, A. Articles by Krystek, S., Jr. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A comparative study of available software for high-accuracy homology modeling: From sequence alignments to structural models

Computer-Assisted Drug Design, Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA

(RECEIVED October 10, 2005; FINAL REVISION January 9, 2006; ACCEPTED January 12, 2006)

An open question in protein homology modeling is, how well do current modeling packages satisfy the dual criteria of quality of results and practical ease of use? To address this question objectively, we examined homology-built models of a variety of therapeutically relevant proteins. The sequence identities across these proteins range from 19% to 76%. A novel metric, the difference alignment index (DAI), is developed to aid in quantifying the quality of local sequence alignments. The DAI is also used to construct the relative sequence alignment (RSA), a new representation of global sequence alignment that facilitates comparison of sequence alignments from different methods. Comparisons of the sequence alignments in terms of the RSA and alignment methodologies are made to better understand the advantages and caveats of each method. All sequence alignments and corresponding 3D models are compared to their respective structure-based alignments and crystal structures. A variety of protein modeling software was used. We find that at sequence identities >40%, all packages give similar (and satisfactory) results; at lower sequence identities (<25%), the sequence alignments generated by Profit and Prime, which incorporate structural information in their sequence alignment, stand out from the rest. Moreover, the model generated by Prime in this low sequence identity region is noted to be superior to the rest. Additionally, we note that DSModeler and MOE, which generate reasonable models for sequence identities >25%, are significantly more functional and easier to use when compared with the other structure-building software.

Keywords: homology modeling; comparative modeling; sequence alignments; protein modeling software; software usability

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Montgomerie, J. A. Cruz, S. Shrivastava, D. Arndt, M. Berjanskii, and D. S. Wishart PROTEUS2: a web server for comprehensive protein structure prediction and structure-based annotation Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W202 - W209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. L. Kolossov, B. Q. Spring, A. Sokolowski, J. E. Conour, R. M. Clegg, P. J. A. Kenis, and H. R. Gaskins Engineering Redox-Sensitive Linkers for Genetically Encoded FRET-Based Biosensors Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2008; 233(2): 238 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Deladoey, N. Pfarr, J.-M. Vuissoz, J. Parma, G. Vassart, S. Biesterfeld, J. Pohlenz, and G. Van Vliet Pseudodominant Inheritance of Goitrous Congenital Hypothyroidism Caused by TPO Mutations: Molecular and in Silico Studies J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Rossi, C. A. Weigelt, A. Nayeem, and S. R. Krystek Jr Loopholes and missing links in protein modeling Protein Sci., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1999 - 2012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]