Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Protein Science (2006), 15:1017-1029. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2006 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, J.
Right arrow Articles by Blundell, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, J.
Right arrow Articles by Blundell, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

An algorithm for predicting protein–protein interaction sites: Abnormally exposed amino acid residues and secondary structure elements

Jemima Hoskins, Simon Lovell1 and Tom L. Blundell

Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, United Kingdom

(RECEIVED May 17, 2005; FINAL REVISION December 5, 2005; ACCEPTED December 13, 2005)

Multiprotein systems mediate most regulatory processes in living organisms. Although the structures of the individual proteins are often defined, less is known of the structures of multiprotein systems. Computational methods for predicting interfaces, using evolutionary conservation and/or physicochemical data, have been developed. Here we consider the use of solvent accessibility, residue propensity, and hydrophobicity, in conjunction with secondary structure data, as prediction parameters. We analyze the influence of residue type and secondary structure on solvent accessibility and define a measure of "relative exposedness." Clustering abnormally high scoring residues provides a basis for predicting interaction sites. The analysis is extended to investigate abnormally exposed secondary structure elements, particularly beta-sheet strands. We show that surface-exposed beta-strands lacking protective features are more likely to be found at protein–protein interfaces, allowing us to create an algorithm with ~68% and ~75% accuracy in differentiating between interacting and edge strands in isolated beta-strands and beta-sheet strands, respectively. These methods of identifying abnormally exposed surface regions are combined in an algorithm, which, on a data set of 77 unbound and disjoint (single chain extracted from complex) structures, predicts 79% of the protein–protein interfaces correctly. If enzyme–inhibitor complexes, where the inhibitor mimics a nonprotein substrate, are excluded, the accuracy increases to 85%.

Keywords: protein–protein interactions; relative exposedness; edge strands



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. C. Chen and C. Lim
Common physical basis of macromolecule-binding sites in proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., November 6, 2008; (2008) gkn868v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. S. Negi, C. H. Schein, N. Oezguen, T. D. Power, and W. Braun
InterProSurf: a web server for predicting interacting sites on protein surfaces
Bioinformatics, December 15, 2007; 23(24): 3397 - 3399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
H.-X. Zhou and S. Qin
Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment
Bioinformatics, September 1, 2007; 23(17): 2203 - 2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Guharoy and P. Chakrabarti
Secondary structure based analysis and classification of biological interfaces: identification of binding motifs in protein protein interactions
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2007; 23(15): 1909 - 1918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Neuvirth, U. Heinemann, D. Birnbaum, N. Tishby, and G. Schreiber
ProMateus--an open research approach to protein-binding sites analysis
Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W543 - W548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Tjong, S. Qin, and H.-X. Zhou
PI2PE: protein interface/interior prediction engine
Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W357 - W362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Hakes, S. C. Lovell, S. G. Oliver, and D. L. Robertson
Specificity in protein interactions and its relationship with sequence diversity and coevolution
PNAS, May 8, 2007; 104(19): 7999 - 8004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
M. Terribilini, J.-H. Lee, C. Yan, R. L. Jernigan, V. Honavar, and D. Dobbs
Prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins from amino acid sequence
RNA, August 1, 2006; 12(8): 1450 - 1462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Protein Society.