HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pereira de Jésus-Tran, K. Articles by Breton, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pereira de Jésus-Tran, K. Articles by Breton, R. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Comparison of crystal structures of human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain complexed with various agonists reveals molecular determinants responsible for binding affinity

Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, Laval University Medical Center (CHUL) and Laval University, Québec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada

(RECEIVED October 12, 2005; FINAL REVISION February 1, 2006; ACCEPTED February 16, 2006)

Androgens exert their effects by binding to the highly specific androgen receptor (AR). In addition to natural potent androgens, AR binds a variety of synthetic agonist or antagonist molecules with different affinities. To identify molecular determinants responsible for this selectivity, we have determined the crystal structure of the human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain (hARLBD) in complex with two natural androgens, testosterone (Testo) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and with an androgenic steroid used in sport doping, tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), at 1.64, 1.90, and 1.75 Å resolution, respectively. Comparison of these structures first highlights the flexibility of several residues buried in the ligand-binding pocket that can accommodate a variety of ligand structures. As expected, the ligand structure itself (dimension, presence, and position of unsaturated bonds that influence the geometry of the steroidal nucleus or the electronic properties of the neighboring atoms, etc.) determines the number of interactions it can make with the hARLBD. Indeed, THG—which possesses the highest affinity—establishes more van der Waals contacts with the receptor than the other steroids, whereas the geometry of the atoms forming electrostatic interactions at both extremities of the steroid nucleus seems mainly responsible for the higher affinity measured experimentally for DHT over Testo. Moreover, estimation of the ligand–receptor interaction energy through modeling confirms that even minor modifications in ligand structure have a great impact on the strength of these interactions. Our crystallographic data combined with those obtained by modeling will be helpful in the design of novel molecules with stronger affinity for the AR.

Keywords: human androgen receptor; crystal structure; ligand binding pocket; agonists; tetrahydrogestrinone

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Cantin, F. Faucher, J.-F. Couture, K. P. de Jesus-Tran, P. Legrand, L. C. Ciobanu, Y. Frechette, R. Labrecque, S. M. Singh, F. Labrie, et al. Structural Characterization of the Human Androgen Receptor Ligand-binding Domain Complexed with EM5744, a Rationally Designed Steroidal Ligand Bearing a Bulky Chain Directed toward Helix 12 J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2007; 282(42): 30910 - 30919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. B. Askew, R. T. Gampe Jr., T. B. Stanley, J. L. Faggart, and E. M. Wilson Modulation of Androgen Receptor Activation Function 2 by Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25801 - 25816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]