Protein Science Sheba protein
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Protein Science (2006), 15:1318-1333. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2006 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lomize, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mosberg, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lomize, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mosberg, H. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Positioning of proteins in membranes: A computational approach

Andrei L. Lomize1, Irina D. Pogozheva1, Mikhail A. Lomize2 and Henry I. Mosberg1

1 College of Pharmacy
2 College of Literature, Science and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1065, USA

(RECEIVED January 30, 2006; FINAL REVISION February 24, 2006; ACCEPTED February 24, 2006)

A new computational approach has been developed to determine the spatial arrangement of proteins in membranes by minimizing their transfer energies from water to the lipid bilayer. The membrane hydrocarbon core was approximated as a planar slab of adjustable thickness with decadiene-like interior and interfacial polarity profiles derived from published EPR studies. Applicability and accuracy of the method was verified for a set of 24 transmembrane proteins whose orientations in membranes have been studied by spin-labeling, chemical modification, fluorescence, ATR FTIR, NMR, cryo-microscopy, and neutron diffraction. Subsequently, the optimal rotational and translational positions were calculated for 109 transmembrane, five integral monotopic and 27 peripheral protein complexes with known 3D structures. This method can reliably distinguish transmembrane and integral monotopic proteins from water-soluble proteins based on their transfer energies and membrane penetration depths. The accuracies of calculated hydrophobic thicknesses and tilt angles were ~1 Å and 2°, respectively, judging from their deviations in different crystal forms of the same proteins. The hydrophobic thicknesses of transmembrane proteins ranged from 21.1 to 43.8 Å depending on the type of biological membrane, while their tilt angles with respect to the bilayer normal varied from zero in symmetric complexes to 26° in asymmetric structures. Calculated hydrophobic boundaries of proteins are located ~5 Å lower than lipid phosphates and correspond to the zero membrane depth parameter of spin-labeled residues. Coordinates of all studied proteins with their membrane boundaries can be found in the Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM) database:http://opm.phar.umich.edu/.

Keywords: membrane protein; tilt; database; modeling; channel; receptor; transporter; rhodopsin



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. K. Burgess, T. P. Dao, A. M. Stanley, and K. G. Fleming
{beta}-Barrel Proteins That Reside in the Escherichia coli Outer Membrane in Vivo Demonstrate Varied Folding Behavior in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2008; 283(39): 26748 - 26758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
M. Bogdanov, J. Xie, P. Heacock, and W. Dowhan
To flip or not to flip: lipid-protein charge interactions are a determinant of final membrane protein topology
J. Cell Biol., September 9, 2008; 182(5): 925 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. L. Wee, K. Balali-Mood, D. Gavaghan, and M. S. P. Sansom
The Interaction of Phospholipase A2 with a Phospholipid Bilayer: Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Biophys. J., August 15, 2008; 95(4): 1649 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. Marsh
Energetics of Hydrophobic Matching in Lipid-Protein Interactions
Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3996 - 4013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Anishkin, B. Akitake, and S. Sukharev
Characterization of the Resting MscS: Modeling and Analysis of the Closed Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel of Small Conductance
Biophys. J., February 15, 2008; 94(4): 1252 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. E. Tusnady, L. Kalmar, and I. Simon
TOPDB: topology data bank of transmembrane proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D234 - D239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Park and V. Helms
On the derivation of propensity scales for predicting exposed transmembrane residues of helical membrane proteins
Bioinformatics, March 15, 2007; 23(6): 701 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. Marsh, M. Jost, C. Peggion, and C. Toniolo
TOAC Spin Labels in the Backbone of Alamethicin: EPR Studies in Lipid Membranes
Biophys. J., January 15, 2007; 92(2): 473 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Protein Society.