| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-1114, USA
2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, College Station, Texas 77843-1114, USA
Studies that compare proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms can provide insights into ability of thermophiles to function at their high habitat temperatures and may provide clues that enable us to better define the forces that stabilize all proteins. Most of the comparative studies have focused on thermal stability and show, as expected, that thermophilic proteins have higher Tm values than their mesophilic counterparts. Although these comparisons are useful, more detailed thermodynamic analyses are required to reach a more complete understanding of the mechanisms thermophilic protein employ to remain folded over a wider range of temperatures. This complete thermodynamic description allows one to generate a stability curve for a protein that defines how the conformational stability (
G) varies with temperature. Here we compare stability curves for many pairs of homologous proteins from thermophilic and mesophilc organisms. Of the basic methods that can be employed to achieve enhanced thermostability, we find that most thermophilic proteins use the simple method that raises the G at all temperatures as the principal way to increase their Tm. We discuss and compare this thermodynamic method with the possible alternatives. In addition we propose ways that structural alterations and changes to the amino acid sequences might give rise to varied methods used to obtain thermostability.
Keywords: protein folding; thermodynamics; protein stability curves; thermophiles; thermostability
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Dumon, A. Varvak, M. A. Wall, J. E. Flint, R. J. Lewis, J. H. Lakey, C. Morland, P. Luginbuhl, S. Healey, T. Todaro, et al. Engineering Hyperthermostability into a GH11 Xylanase Is Mediated by Subtle Changes to Protein Structure J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2008; 283(33): 22557 - 22564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Bae, R. M. Bannen, and G. N. Phillips Jr. Bioinformatic method for protein thermal stabilization by structural entropy optimization PNAS, July 15, 2008; 105(28): 9594 - 9597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Montanucci, P. Fariselli, P. L. Martelli, and R. Casadio Predicting protein thermostability changes from sequence upon multiple mutations Bioinformatics, July 1, 2008; 24(13): i190 - i195. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Dehouck, B. Folch, and M. Rooman Revisiting the correlation between proteins' thermoresistance and organisms' thermophilicity Protein Eng. Des. Sel., April 1, 2008; 21(4): 275 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Wang, A. B. Cowley, and D. R. Benson Enhancing the thermal stability of mitochondrial cytochrome b5 by introducing a structural motif characteristic of the less stable microsomal isoform Protein Eng. Des. Sel., October 24, 2007; (2007) gzm053v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Sujak, N. J. M. Sanghamitra, O. Maneg, B. Ludwig, and S. Mazumdar Thermostability of Proteins: Role of Metal Binding and pH on the Stability of the Dinuclear CuA Site of Thermus thermophilus Biophys. J., October 15, 2007; 93(8): 2845 - 2851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Glyakina, S. O. Garbuzynskiy, M. Yu. Lobanov, and O. V. Galzitskaya Different packing of external residues can explain differences in the thermostability of proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms Bioinformatics, September 1, 2007; 23(17): 2231 - 2238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
