Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 1, 2006, 10.1110/ps.062292106
Protein Science (2006), 15:2051-2061. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2006 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.062292106v1
15/9/2051    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hausrath, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hausrath, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A model for the coupling of {alpha}-helix and tertiary contact formation

Andrew C. Hausrath

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

(RECEIVED April 19, 2006; FINAL REVISION April 19, 2006; ACCEPTED May 1, 2006)

Peptides corresponding to excised {alpha}-helical segments of natural proteins can spontaneously form helices in solution. However, peptide helices are usually substantially less stable in solution than in the structural context of a folded protein, because of the additional interactions possible between helices in a protein. Such interactions can be thought of as coupling helix formation and tertiary contact formation. The relative energetic contributions of the two processes to the total energy of the folded state of a protein is a matter of current debate. To investigate this balance, an extended helix-coil model (XHC) that incorporates both effects has been constructed. The model treats helix formation with the Lifson-Roig formalism, which describes helix initiation and propagation through cooperative local interactions. The model postulates an additional parameter representing participation of a site in a tertiary contact. In the model, greater helix stability can be achieved through combinations of these short-range and long-range interactions. For instance, stronger tertiary contacts can compensate for helices with little intrinsic stability. By varying the strength of the nonlocal interactions, the model can exhibit behavior consistent with a variety of qualitative models describing the relative importance of secondary and tertiary structure. Moreover, the model is explicit in that it can be used to fit experimental data to individual peptide sequences, providing a means to quantify the two contributions on a common energetic basis.

Keywords: helix-coil transition; hydrophobic effect; binary pattern; secondary structure; tertiary interactions



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Protein Society.