Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Protein Science (2007), 16:449-464. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2007 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krishna, M. M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Englander, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krishna, M. M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Englander, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A unified mechanism for protein folding: Predetermined pathways with optional errors

Mallela M.G. Krishna and S. Walter Englander

Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6059, USA

(RECEIVED November 6, 2006; FINAL REVISION December 11, 2006; ACCEPTED December 11, 2006)

There is a fundamental conflict between two different views of how proteins fold. Kinetic experiments and theoretical calculations are often interpreted in terms of different population fractions folding through different intermediates in independent unrelated pathways (IUP model). However, detailed structural information indicates that all of the protein population folds through a sequence of intermediates predetermined by the foldon substructure of the target protein and a sequential stabilization principle. These contrary views can be resolved by a predetermined pathway—optional error (PPOE) hypothesis. The hypothesis is that any pathway intermediate can incorporate a chance misfolding error that blocks folding and must be reversed for productive folding to continue. Different fractions of the protein population will then block at different steps, populate different intermediates, and fold at different rates, giving the appearance of multiple unrelated pathways. A test of the hypothesis matches the two models against extensive kinetic folding results for hen lysozyme which have been widely cited in support of independent parallel pathways. The PPOE model succeeds with fewer fitting constants. The fitted PPOE reaction scheme leads to known folding behavior, whereas the IUP properties are contradicted by experiment. The appearance of a conflict with multipath theoretical models seems to be due to their different focus, namely on multitrack microscopic behavior versus cooperative macroscopic behavior. The integration of three well-documented principles in the PPOE model (cooperative foldons, sequential stabilization, optional errors) provides a unifying explanation for how proteins fold and why they fold in that way.

Keywords: protein folding; misfolding; foldons; sequential stabilization; optional error; predetermined pathway; lysozyme



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Wu, E. Kondrashkina, C. Kayatekin, C. R. Matthews, and O. Bilsel
Microsecond acquisition of heterogeneous structure in the folding of a TIM barrel protein
PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13367 - 13372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
T. R. Sosnick
Kinetic barriers and the role of topology in protein and RNA folding
Protein Sci., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 1308 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Y.-J. Shiu, U-S. Jeng, Y.-S. Huang, Y.-H. Lai, H.-F. Lu, C.-T. Liang, I-J. Hsu, C.-H. Su, C. Su, I. Chao, et al.
Global and Local Structural Changes of Cytochrome c and Lysozyme Characterized by a Multigroup Unfolding Process
Biophys. J., June 15, 2008; 94(12): 4828 - 4836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Bedard, M. M. G. Krishna, L. Mayne, and S. W. Englander
Protein folding: Independent unrelated pathways or predetermined pathway with optional errors
PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7182 - 7187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. G. Wolf and S. W. de Leeuw
Fast In Silico Protein Folding by Introduction of Alternating Hydrogen Bond Potentials
Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3742 - 3747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Jha and J. B. Udgaonkar
Exploring the Cooperativity of the Fast Folding Reaction of a Small Protein Using Pulsed Thiol Labeling and Mass Spectrometry
J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37479 - 37491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
M. M.G. Krishna, H. Maity, J. N. Rumbley, and S. W. Englander
Branching in the sequential folding pathway of cytochrome c
Protein Sci., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1946 - 1956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The Protein Society.