|
|
||||||||
Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6059, USA
(RECEIVED November 6, 2006; FINAL REVISION December 11, 2006; ACCEPTED December 11, 2006)
There is a fundamental conflict between two different views of how proteins fold. Kinetic experiments and theoretical calculations are often interpreted in terms of different population fractions folding through different intermediates in independent unrelated pathways (IUP model). However, detailed structural information indicates that all of the protein population folds through a sequence of intermediates predetermined by the foldon substructure of the target protein and a sequential stabilization principle. These contrary views can be resolved by a predetermined pathwayoptional error (PPOE) hypothesis. The hypothesis is that any pathway intermediate can incorporate a chance misfolding error that blocks folding and must be reversed for productive folding to continue. Different fractions of the protein population will then block at different steps, populate different intermediates, and fold at different rates, giving the appearance of multiple unrelated pathways. A test of the hypothesis matches the two models against extensive kinetic folding results for hen lysozyme which have been widely cited in support of independent parallel pathways. The PPOE model succeeds with fewer fitting constants. The fitted PPOE reaction scheme leads to known folding behavior, whereas the IUP properties are contradicted by experiment. The appearance of a conflict with multipath theoretical models seems to be due to their different focus, namely on multitrack microscopic behavior versus cooperative macroscopic behavior. The integration of three well-documented principles in the PPOE model (cooperative foldons, sequential stabilization, optional errors) provides a unifying explanation for how proteins fold and why they fold in that way.
Keywords: protein folding; misfolding; foldons; sequential stabilization; optional error; predetermined pathway; lysozyme
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Wu, E. Kondrashkina, C. Kayatekin, C. R. Matthews, and O. Bilsel Microsecond acquisition of heterogeneous structure in the folding of a TIM barrel protein PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13367 - 13372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Sosnick Kinetic barriers and the role of topology in protein and RNA folding Protein Sci., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 1308 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Shiu, U-S. Jeng, Y.-S. Huang, Y.-H. Lai, H.-F. Lu, C.-T. Liang, I-J. Hsu, C.-H. Su, C. Su, I. Chao, et al. Global and Local Structural Changes of Cytochrome c and Lysozyme Characterized by a Multigroup Unfolding Process Biophys. J., June 15, 2008; 94(12): 4828 - 4836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bedard, M. M. G. Krishna, L. Mayne, and S. W. Englander Protein folding: Independent unrelated pathways or predetermined pathway with optional errors PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7182 - 7187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Wolf and S. W. de Leeuw Fast In Silico Protein Folding by Introduction of Alternating Hydrogen Bond Potentials Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3742 - 3747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Jha and J. B. Udgaonkar Exploring the Cooperativity of the Fast Folding Reaction of a Small Protein Using Pulsed Thiol Labeling and Mass Spectrometry J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37479 - 37491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M.G. Krishna, H. Maity, J. N. Rumbley, and S. W. Englander Branching in the sequential folding pathway of cytochrome c Protein Sci., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1946 - 1956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |