Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Protein Science (2007), 16:1851-1866. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2007 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeChancie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Houk, K.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeChancie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Houk, K.N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

How similar are enzyme active site geometries derived from quantum mechanical theozymes to crystal structures of enzyme-inhibitor complexes? Implications for enzyme design

Jason DeChancie, Fernando R. Clemente, Adam J.T. Smith, Hakan Gunaydin, Yi-Lei Zhao, Xiyun Zhang, and K.N. Houk

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1569, USA

(RECEIVED April 21, 2007; FINAL REVISION June 21, 2007; ACCEPTED June 21, 2007)

Quantum mechanical optimizations of theoretical enzymes (theozymes), which are predicted catalytic arrays of biological functionalities stabilizing a transition state, have been carried out for a set of nine diverse enzyme active sites. For each enzyme, the theozyme for the rate-determining transition state plus the catalytic groups modeled by side-chain mimics was optimized using B3LYP/6–31G(d) or, in one case, HF/3–21G(d) quantum mechanical calculations. To determine if the theozyme can reproduce the natural evolutionary catalytic geometry, the positions of optimized catalytic atoms, i.e., covalent, partial covalent, or stabilizing interactions with transition state atoms, are compared to the positions of the atoms in the X-ray crystal structure with a bound inhibitor. These structure comparisons are contrasted to computed substrate–active site structures surrounded by the same theozyme residues. The theozyme/transition structure is shown to predict geometries of active sites with an average RMSD of 0.64 Å from the crystal structure, while the RMSD for the bound intermediate complexes are significantly higher at 1.42 Å. The implications for computational enzyme design are discussed.

Keywords: theozyme; active site structure; density functional theory; enzyme; biological catalysis



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The Protein Society.