Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 14, 2008, 10.1110/ps.083443908
Protein Science (2008), 17:1077-1085. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2008 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.083443908v1
17/6/1077    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ilyinskii, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Shneider, A. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ilyinskii, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Shneider, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The proteosomal degradation of fusion proteins cannot be predicted from the proteosome susceptibility of their individual components

Petr O. Ilyinskii1, Anatoli B. Meriin2, Vladimir L. Gabai2, Evgeny V. Usachev3, Alexei G. Prilipov3, Galini Thoidis1, and Alexander M. Shneider1

1 Cure Lab, Inc., Canton, Massachusetts 02021, USA
2 Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA
3 Ivanovsky Virology Institute RAMS, 123098 Moscow, Russia

(RECEIVED January 8, 2008; FINAL REVISION March 6, 2008; ACCEPTED March 10, 2008)

It is assumed that the proteosome-processing characteristics of fusion constructs can be predicted from the sum of the proteosome sensitivity of their components. In the present study, we observed that a fusion construct consisting of proteosome-degradable proteins does not necessarily result in a proteosome-degradable chimera. Conversely, fusion of proteosome-resistant proteins may result in a proteosome-degradable composite. We previously demonstrated that conserved influenza proteins can be unified into a single fusion antigen that is protective, and that vaccination with combinations of proteosome-resistant and proteosome-degradable antigens resulted in an augmented T-cell response. In the present study we constructed proteosome-degradable mutants of conserved influenza proteins NP, M1, NS1, and M2. These were then fused into multipartite proteins in different positions. The stability and degradation profiles of these fusion constructs were demonstrated to depend on the relative position of the individual proteins within the chimeric molecule. Combining unstable sequences of either NP and M1 or NS1 and M2 resulted in either rapidly proteosome degraded or proteosome-resistant bipartite fusion mutants. However, further unification of the proteosome-degradable forms into a single four-partite fusion molecule resulted in relatively stable chimeric proteins. Conversely, the addition of proteosome-resistant wild-type M2 to proteosome-resistant NP–M1–NS1 fusion protein lead to the decreased stability of the resulting four-partite multigene products, which in one case was clearly proteosome dependent. Additionally, a highly destabilized form of M1 failed to destabilize the wild-type NP. Collectively, we did not observe any additive effect leading to proteosomal degradation/nondegradation of a multigene construct.

Keywords: proteosome degradation and resistance; chimeric proteins



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The Protein Society.