Protein Science Sheba protein
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAURENTS, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by LEVITT, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LAURENTS, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by LEVITT, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Protein Science, Vol 3, Issue 11 1938-1944, Copyright © 1994 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press


ARTICLE

Different protein sequences can give rise to highly similar folds through different stabilizing interactions

D. V. LAURENTS, S. SUBBIAH and M. LEVITT
Beckman Laboratories for Structural Biology, Department of Cell Biology, and Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305

We report an interesting case of structural similarity between 2 small, nonhomologous proteins, the third domain of ovomucoid (ovomucoid) and the C-terminal fragment of ribosomal L7/L12 protein (CTF). The region of similarity consists of a 3-stranded {beta}-sheet and an {alpha}-helix. This region is highly similar; the corresponding elements of secondary structure share a common topology, and the RMS difference for ``equivalent'' C{alpha} atoms is 1.6 A. Surprisingly, this common structure arises from completely different sequences. For the common core, the sequence identity is less than 3%, and there is neither significant sequence similarity nor similarity in the position or orientation of conserved hydrophobic residues. This superposition raises the question of how 2 entirely different sequences can produce an identical structure. Analyzing this common region in ovomucoid revealed that it is stabilized by disulfide bonds. In contrast, the corresponding structure in CTF is stabilized in the {alpha}-helix by a composition of residues with high helix-forming propensities. This result suggests that different sequences and different stabilizing interactions can produce an identical structure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by The Protein Society.