Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAILEY, D.
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BAILEY, D.
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Protein Science, Vol 3, Issue 11 2129-2128, Copyright © 1994 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press


ARTICLE

A structural comparison of 21 inhibitor complexes of the aspartic proteinase from Endothia parasitica

D. BAILEY and J. B. COOPER
Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University College London, University of London, Gower St., London, UK.

The aspartic proteinases are an important family of enzymes associated with several pathological conditions such as hypertension (renin), gastric ulcers (pepsin), neoplastic disease (cathepsins D and E), and AIDS (HIV proteinase). Studies of inhibitor binding are therefore of great importance for design of novel inhibitors for potential therapeutic applications. Numerous X-ray analyses have shown that transition-state isostere inhibitors of aspartic proteinases bind in similar extended conformations in the active-site cleft of the target enzyme. Upon comparison of 21 endothiapepsin inhibitor complexes, the hydrogen bond lengths were found to be shortest where the isostere (P(1)-P'(1)) interacts with the enzyme's catalytic aspartate pair. Hydrogen bonds with good geometry also occur at P'(2), and more so at P(3), where a conserved water molecule is involved in the interactions. Weaker interactions also occur at P(2), where the side-chain conformations of the inhibitors appear to be more variable than at the more tightly held positions. At P(2) and, to a lesser extent, P(3), the side-chain conformations depend intriguingly on interactions with spatially adjacent inhibitor side chains, namely P'(1) and P(1), respectively. The tight binding at P(1)-P'(1), P(3), and P'(2) is also reflected in the larger number of van der Waals contacts and the large decreases in solvent-accessible area at these positions, as well as their low temperature factors. Our analysis substantiates earlier proposals for the locations of protons in the transition-state complex. Aspartate 32 is probably ionized in the complexes, its charge being stabilized by 1, or sometimes 2, hydrogen bonds from the transition-state analogues at P(1). The detailed comparison also indicates that the P(1) and P(2) residues of substrate in the ES complex may be strained by the extensive binding interactions at P(3), P'(1), and P'(2) in a manner that would facilitate hydrolysis of the scissile peptide bond.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by The Protein Society.