Protein Science, Vol 7, Issue 12 2511-2521, Copyright © 1998 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

ARTICLE

Crystal structure of the effector-binding domain of the trehalose-repressor of Escherichia coli, a member of the LacI family, in its complexes with inducer trehalose-6-phosphate and noninducer trehalose

U. HARS, R. HORLACHER, W. BOOS, W. WELTE and K. DIEDERICHS
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitatsstr. 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany

The crystal structure of the Escherichia coli trehalose repressor (TreR) in a complex with its inducer trehalose-6-phosphate was determined by the method of multiple isomorphous replacement (MIR) at 2.5 A resolution, followed by the structure determination of TreR in a complex with its noninducer trehalose at 3.1 A resolution. The model consists of residues 61 to 315 comprising the effector binding domain, which forms a dimer as in other members of the LacI family. This domain is composed of two similar subdomains each consisting of a central {beta}-sheet sandwiched between {alpha}-helices. The effector binding pocket is at the interface of these subdomains. In spite of different physiological functions, the crystal structures of the two complexes of TreR turned out to be virtually identical to each other with the conformation being similar to those of the effector binding domains of the LacI and PurR in complex with their effector molecules. According to the crystal structure, the noninducer trehalose binds to a similar site as the trehalose portion of trehalose-6-phosphate. The binding affinity for the former is lower than for the latter. The noninducer trehalose thus binds competitively to the repressor. Unlike the phosphorylated inducer molecule, it is incapable of blocking the binding of the repressor headpiece to its operator DNA. The ratio of the concentrations of trehalose-6-phosphate and trehalose thus is used to switch between the two alternative metabolic uses of trehalose as an osmoprotectant and as a carbon source.
CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. N. Rao, D. Kumaran, J. Seetharaman, J. B. Bonanno, S. K. Burley, and S. Swaminathan Crystal structure of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase-related protein: Biochemical and biological implications. Protein Sci., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1735 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Krug, S.-J. Lee, K. Diederichs, W. Boos, and W. Welte Crystal Structure of the Sugar Binding Domain of the Archaeal Transcriptional Regulator TrmB J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 10976 - 10982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. S. Franco, L. J. Mota, C. M. Soares, and I. de Sa-Nogueira Functional Domains of the Bacillus subtilis Transcription Factor AraR and Identification of Amino Acids Important for Nucleoprotein Complex Assembly and Effector Binding. J. Bacteriol., April 1, 2006; 188(8): 3024 - 3036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Fukami-Kobayashi, Y. Tateno, and K. Nishikawa Parallel Evolution of Ligand Specificity Between LacI/GalR Family Repressors and Periplasmic Sugar-Binding Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2003; 20(2): 267 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Swint-Kruse, C. R. Elam, J. W. Lin, D. R. Wycuff, and K. S. Matthews Plasticity of quaternary structure: Twenty-two ways to form a LacI dimer Protein Sci., February 1, 2001; 10(2): 262 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. M. Johnson and G. M. Church Predicting ligand-binding function in families of bacterial receptors PNAS, April 11, 2000; 97(8): 3965 - 3970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]