|
|
||||||||
Protein Science, Vol 7, Issue 12 2578-2586, Copyright © 1998 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
ARTICLE |
O. KESKIN, I. BAHAR, A. Y. BADRETDINOV, O. B. PTITSYN and R. L. JERNIGAN
Chemical Engineering Department & Polymer Research Center, Bogazici University, and TUBITAK Advanced Polymeric Materials Research Center, Bebek 80815, Istanbul, Turkey
Whether knowledge-based intra-molecular inter-residue potentials are valid to represent inter-molecular interactions taking place at protein-protein interfaces has been questioned in several studies. Differences in the chain connectivity effect and in residue packing geometry between interfaces and single chain monomers have been pointed out as possible sources of distinct energetics for the two cases. In the present study, the interfacial regions of protein-protein complexes are examined to extract inter-molecular inter-residue potentials, using the same statistical methods as those previously adopted for intra-molecular residue pairs. Two sets of energy parameters are derived, corresponding to solvent-mediation and ``average residue'' mediation. The former set is shown to be highly correlated (correlation coefficient 0.89) with that previously obtained for inter-residue interactions within single chain monomers, while the latter exhibits a weaker correlation (0.69) with its intra-molecular counterpart. In addition to the close similarity of intra- and inter-molecular solvent-mediated potentials, they are shown to be significantly more residue-specific and thereby discriminative compared to the residue-mediated ones, indicating that solvent-mediation plays a major role in controlling the effective inter-residue interactions, either at interfaces, or within single monomers. Based on this observation, a reduced set of energy parameters comprising 20 one-body and 3 two-body terms is proposed (as opposed to the 20 X 20 tables of inter-residue potentials), which reproduces the conventional 20 X 20 tables with a correlation coefficient of 0.99.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Douguet, H.-C. Chen, A. Tovchigrechko, and I. A. Vakser DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces Bioinformatics, November 1, 2006; 22(21): 2612 - 2618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tsuchiya, K. Kinoshita, and H. Nakamura Analyses of homo-oligomer interfaces of proteins from the complementarity of molecular surface, electrostatic potential and hydrophobicity Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 2006; 19(9): 421 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Keskin and R. Nussinov Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 1, 2005; 18(1): 11 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Keskin, C.-J. Tsai, H. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein-protein interfaces and its implications Protein Sci., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 1043 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jiang, A. Tovchigrechko, and I. A. Vakser The role of geometric complementarity in secondary structure packing: A systematic docking study Protein Sci., August 1, 2003; 12(8): 1646 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |