Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEGRETE, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by PALAU, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NEGRETE, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by PALAU, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Protein Science, Vol 7, Issue 6 1368-1379, Copyright © 1998 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

ARTICLE

Deciphering the structural code for proteins: Helical propensities in domain classes and statistical multiresidue information in {alpha}-helices

J. A. NEGRETE, Y. VINUALES and J. PALAU
Unitat de Biotecnologia Computacional, Departament de Bioquimica i Biotecnologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona 43005, Catalonia, Spain

We made several statistical analyses in a large sample of nearly 4,000 helices (from 546 redundancy-controlled PDB protein subunits), which give new insights into the helical properties of globular proteins. In a first experiment, the amino acid composition of the whole sample was compared with the composition of two helical sample subgroups (the ``mainly-{alpha}'' and the ``({alpha}/{beta})(8) barrel'' domain classes); we reached the conclusion that composition-based helical propensities for secondary structure prediction do not depend on the structural class. Running a five-residue window through the whole sample, the positional composition revealed that positive and negative residues are located throughout the helices and tend to neutralize the macrodipole effect. On this basis, we analyzed charged triplets using a running five-residue window. The conclusion was that only mixed charged residues [positive (+) and negative (-)] located at positions 1-2-5 and 1-4-5 are clearly favored. In these locations the most abundant are (--..+) and (-..++), and this shows the existence of side chain microdipoles, which neutralize the large macrodipole of the helix. We made a systematic statistical analysis of charged, dipolar, and hydrophobic + aromatic residues, which enabled us to work out rules that should be useful for modeling and design purposes. Finally, we analyzed the relative abundance of all the different amphipathic double-arcs that are present in helices formed by octapeptides (8) and nonapeptides (18). All of the double-arcs that make up Schiffer and Edmundson's classical helical wheel are found in abundance in the sample.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by The Protein Society.