|
|
||||||||
1-antitrypsin that play structural and functional roles
1 National Creative Research Initiatives, Protein Strain Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 130-650, Korea
2 Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Reprint requests to: Myeong-Hee Yu, Protein Strain Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea; e-mail: mhyu{at}kist.re.kr; fax: 82-2-958-6919.
(RECEIVED March 1, 2001; FINAL REVISION April 16, 2001; ACCEPTED April 23, 2001)
3 Present address: BMBCB, Northwestern University, 2153 N. Campus Dr., Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA. ![]()
4 Present address: Laboratory of Biophysical Chemistry, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. ![]()
5 Present address: Camitro Corp., 4040 Campbell Ave., Menlo Park, California 94027, USA. ![]()
Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin, a prototype of serpins, indicated that cavities provide a structural basis for the native strain of the molecule. We have systematically mapped the cavities of
1-antitrypsin that play such structural and functional roles by designing cavity-filling mutations at residues that line the walls of the cavities. Results show that energetically unfavorable cavities are distributed throughout the
1-antitrypsin molecule, and the cavity-filling mutations stabilized the native conformation at 8 out of 10 target sites. The stabilization effect of the individual cavity-filling mutations of
1-antitrypsin varied (0.21.9 kcal/mol for each additional methylene group) and appeared to depend largely on the structural flexibility of the cavity environment. Cavity-filling mutations that decreased inhibitory activity of
1-antitrypsin were localized in the loop regions that interact with ß-sheet A distal from the reactive center loop. The results are consistent with the notion that ß-sheet A and the structure around it mobilize when
1-antitrypsin forms a complex with a target protease.
Keywords:
1-antitrypsin; cavity-filling mutations; conformational stability; native strain; molecular packing
Abbreviations: serpin, serine protease inhibitor
1AT,
1-antitrypsin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin (
1AT), antithrombin III,
1-antichymotrypsin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1,
2-antiplasmin, and C1-inhibitor (Huber and Carrell 1989). Ovalbumin and angiotensinogen are not protease inhibitors but are included in the serpin family because their amino acid sequences and tertiary structures are homologous to other members of the family (Huber and Carrell 1989). The inhibition process of serpins has been described as a suicide substrate mechanism (Rubin et al. 1990; Wright and Scarsdale 1995) in which the serpin, on binding to the target protease, is cleaved and then either is released as a free, cleaved molecule (substrate pathway) or forms a stable serpinenzyme complex (inhibitory pathway). The stoichiometry of inhibition (the number of moles of inhibitors required to completely inhibit one mole of a target protease) is given by 1 + ksubstrate/kinhibition, in which ksubstrate and kinhibition are the rate constants for the substrate and inhibitory pathways, respectively. On binding with cognate target proteases, most serpin molecules partition into the complex formation, bringing the stoichiometry of inhibition close to one. However, interactions with noncognate proteases or some mutations in serpin molecules induce more partitioning into the substrate pathway, resulting in the increase in the stoichiometry of inhibition. The crystal structure of a serpinprotease complex was reported recently (Huntington et al. 2000). When a serpin forms a complex with its target protease, the reactive center loop of the serpin is cleaved and inserted into the major ß-sheet, sheet A (Lawrence et al. 1995; Shore et al. 1995), while the target protease is still attached to the cleaved loop of the serpin as an acyl intermediate (Lawrence et al. 1995; Wilczynska et al. 1995; Huntington et al. 2000). This conformational switching prevents catalytic deacylation due to the distortion of the protease active site (Huntington et al. 2000), which results in trapping the stabilized complex. The strain of the native serpin structure is probably required for this conformational switching. Indeed, recent stop-flow measurements showed that retarding the loop insertion into ß-sheet A increased the stoichiometry of inhibition (Lawrence et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2000).
To elucidate the structural basis of the native strain of serpins, we previously screened and characterized amino acid substitutions that stabilized
1AT (Lee et al. 1996; Ryu et al. 1996; Im et al. 1999; Seo et al. 2000). Many stabilizing mutations of
1AT decreased the size of the side chains inside the molecule, whereas some others increased the size of side chains. This is unusual, because the hydrophobic side chains in the interior of common globular proteins are tightly packed as in small organic molecule crystals (Richards 1974), and both size reduction and incorporation of bulkier residues are usually destabilizing (Lee and Vasmatzis 1977; Karpusas et al. 1989). Structural examination of the mutation sites of
1AT, however, revealed that side chains are overpacked wherever large-to-small substitutions occurred (Lee et al. 1996; Ryu et al. 1996; Im et al. 1999; Seo et al. 2000), whereas cavities were observed near the small-to-large substitutions (Im et al. 1999; Seo et al. 2000). These studies indicated that the inhibitory serpin molecules are folded suboptimally, and that the side chain overpacking and the presence of cavities are parts of the structural features that facilitate conformational switching during complex formation.
In the present study, we designed cavity-filling mutations by analyzing the X-ray crystal structure of the wild-type molecule (Elliott et al. 1998) to identify systematically the cavities that are important for strain and inhibitory activity of
1AT. Small hydrophobic residues were selected from various residues that line the walls of cavities. We chose only sites where larger residues occupy equivalent positions in the sequence of ovalbumin, which is a more stable member of the serpin family, because many of the substituted residues stabilizing
1AT identified previously are ones found in the ovalbumin sequence (Lee et al. 1996; Im et al. 1999; Seo et al. 2000). We replaced the small hydrophobic residues at the target sites with larger hydrophobic residues. Our results show that cavities playing a role in the native strain are distributed throughout the
1AT molecule, but those that regulate inhibitory activity are highly localized at one end of the molecule that interacts with ß-sheet A.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1AT
1AT, and the total cavity volume was about 850 Å3. We designed cavity-filling mutations of
1AT at the residues that met the following criteria: (1) residues whose side chain atoms form a part of the cavity wall; (2) small hydrophobic residues, alanine and valine; and (3) residues smaller than those at the equivalent positions in the sequence of ovalbumin. With such criteria, 10 target sites were chosen for cavity-filling mutations, which are shown and described in Figure 1
-helix A, hydrophobic core (
-helix B and ß-sheet B), loops interacting with ß-sheet A at the distal end from the reactive center loop, and ß-sheet C. Each alanine target residue was replaced with valine, isoleucine, or leucine. Each valine target residue was replaced with isoleucine or leucine. Mutational effects on the conformational stability were measured by equilibrium unfolding in the presence of guanidine (Fig. 2A
G) of the mutant proteins are summarized in Table 2
G varied from 0.2 to 3.8 kcal/mol for the stabilizing mutations. Generally, the increase in stability was saturated by a single (Val
Ile) or double (Ala
Val) methylene group insertion, except for the Ala 31 site, where stability increased steadily by replacement with bulkier hydrophobic residues up to phenylalanine. At almost all sites, isoleucine variants were more stable than leucine variants (for the Ala 31 site, the leucine variant was as stable as the isoleucine variant). For the Ala 183 and Ala 248 sites, where phenylalanine substitutions were also made, phenylalanine variants were more stable than leucine variants but less stable than isoleucine variants (Table 2
1AT variants were examined by determining the stoichiometry of inhibition against porcine pancreatic elastase (Fig. 2B
|
|
|
|

Gint) between V173I and A183V was calculated to be +1.0 kcal/mol, and that between A284V and V364I to be -1.1 kcal/mol (Table 3
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1AT
1AT increased the stability of the molecule. Even the unsuccessful substitutions at the other two sites showed only mild destabilization effects (Table 2
1AT, only a modest individual stabilization effect was shown by most substitutions. The magnitudes of the contribution made by a single methylene group to the stability gain varied from 0.2 to 1.9 kcal/mol, but most were in the range of 0.30.6 kcal/mol (Table 2
1AT can be characterized by two features: high frequency of successful stabilization but modest individual stabilization effect.
Structural basis of the cavity-filling stabilization of
1AT
In general, the stabilizing effect caused by the cavity-filling mutations of
1AT was saturated by the addition of one or two methylene groups, and isoleucine variants were more stable than leucine variants at most sites (Table 2
). The results indicate that there is a limitation in accommodating size increases and steric adjustments in the interior of
1AT. Studies on the cavity-filling mutations of hen egg white lysozyme indicated that the sum of free energy change caused by the hydrophobicity and the cavity size correlated well with the stability change (Ohmura et al. 2001). The cavity size or the hydrophobicity of the newly introduced residue, however, does not seem to be the major factor that determines the stabilizing effect of cavity-filling mutations of
1AT, because there is no correlation between the cavity size and the stability changes in the same kinds of substitutions. It appears that the stabilization effect of the cavity-filling mutations of
1AT depends not only on the size and shape of the cavities but also on the flexibility of their local environment, as has been suggested (Eriksson et al. 1992; Lee 1993). Consistent with this, Val 55 and Ala 250, the two sites in the hydrophobic core where cavity-filling mutations show destabilization effects, show lower B factors than Ala 248, the other site in the hydrophobic core, mutations of which stabilize the protein (side chain average B of 20 and 13 vs. 41).
The stabilization effect of cavity-filling mutations also appears to depend on the existence and distribution of other cavities nearby. The stabilization effect of A183V is 1.9 kcal/mol per methylene group, the greatest reported so far (Pace 1992; Akasako et al. 1997). Ala 183 is located on the exposed face of sheet A but is underneath helix F (Fig. 1
). The cavity volume is 13 Å3, large enough to accommodate perhaps one methylene group. Interestingly, however, there are several small cavities nearby, especially at the interface between helix F and sheet A (Fig. 3A
). Structural adjustment, including rearrangement of other cavities, could result in better packing. Structural flexibility in this region was also noticeable in the double mutation analysis. The side chains of Val 173 and Ala 183 form the walls of a single cavity (Table 1
; Fig. 3A
) but do not interact directly (the distance between the two closest atoms is 6.6 Å). However, the stabilization obtained by the double mutation, V173I/A183V, is more than the sum of those of single mutations by 1.0 kcal/mol (Table 3
). This indicates that the stabilizing effect of A183V mutation is greater in the V173I background than in the wild-type background. The cavity distribution near Ala 183 is quite a contrast to that near Ala 284 and Val 364. Ala 284 and Val 364 form a single isolated cavity of 43 Å3 in the core next to sheet C (Fig. 3B
). Unlike the substitutions at Ala 183, A284V and V364I stabilized
1AT only by 0.4 kcal/mol per methylene group (Table 2
). In addition, the double mutations of A284V/V364I showed a negative effect (Table 3
), indicating that the stabilization effects of the two mutations are compensatory. This may be because of steric clash of the two side chains. These results indicate that the structure can adjust at the interface between sheet A, helix F, and the following loop, but that the adjustment in the interior of sheet C is rather limited.
|
1AT, only the substitutions at Val 145, Val 173, and Val 321 significantly affected the inhibitory activity (Table 2
1AT at the region interacting with sheet A distal from the reactive center loop (Fig. 1
1AT have to be lifted to open ß-sheet A for the facile loop insertion that occurs during complex formation with a target protease. Consistent with this, our double mutation analysis in this region (Table 3
Val 145 and Val 321 are located in the loop region at the bottom of the molecule (Fig. 1
). Val 145 is involved in Cavity 11 along with residues of helix F (Ala 153, Gln 156; Table 1
), and Val 321 is involved in Cavity 7 along with residues of helix B in the hydrophobic core (Leu 64, Thr 68; Table 1
). The functional importance of these sites has not been suggested explicitly in previous reports. In the recently reported
1ATtrypsin complex structure (Huntington et al. 2000), the reactive center loop of the serpin is inserted fully into A sheet, and the protease is located at the bottom of the molecule, slightly skew of the central axis of the serpin molecule. Our mutations at Val 145 and Val 321, however, do not appear to influence the contact interactions between the serpin and the protease because the mutation sites are in the interior of the serpin molecule and are apart from the final protease docking site. Rather, the cavity-filling by V145I and V321I substitutions might strengthen the interactions between sheet A and the surrounding secondary structures. In the complex structure (PDB code ID: 1ezx), the cavity interactions and their distribution near Val 145 and Val 321 are rearranged substantially and the cavities near Val 173 disappeared completely, supporting that the cavity interactions near these residues in the native form are to be mobilized during the complex formation. Our results are consistent with the notion that a substantial opening and mobilization of ß-sheet A and the interacting secondary structures are accompanied during the complex formation.
Implications of the
1AT structure
The total cavity volume and average packing density computed in the
1AT structure are 2% and 0.67, respectively. These values are not very different from those of common globular proteins (Richards 1974; Rashin et al. 1986). However, previous mutational studies strongly indicated that the native form of
1AT is suboptimally folded and that it can be stabilized by large-to-small mutations at many sites as well as by small-to-large mutations at other sites (Lee et al. 1996; Ryu et al. 1996; Im et al. 1999; Seo et al. 2000). The structural features that stabilize a protein molecule by a small-to-large substitution will be different from those that allow stabilization upon a large-to-small substitution. Stabilization by large-to-small substitutions must arise from relieving a preexisting strain in an overpacked, inflexible region. Stabilization by small-to-large substitutions, on the other hand, would normally require an efficient repacking, because the shape of the new larger side chains will rarely fit the existing cavity perfectly (Karpusas et al. 1989; Daopin et al. 1991). Such efficient repacking can be obtained only when the structure is flexible. It is also not unreasonable to expect that the stabilization by a large-to-small mutation will generally be larger in magnitude than that by a small-to-large mutation because the former involves relieving a preexisting strain whereas the latter involves finding a suitable new arrangement within the given structure. This explains why the magnitude of the stabilization observed for most of the cavity-filling mutations of the present study tends to be small. The fact that stabilization could be obtained at so many sites, both by small-to-large and large-to-small mutations, indicates that the
1AT structure is made of a "mosaic" of many over- and under-packed regions.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1AT that play roles in the stability and function of the molecule. Although energetically unfavorable cavities are found throughout the molecule of
1AT, cavity-filling mutations that affect the inhibitory activity appear to occur only at the sites that need to be mobilized during complex formation with a target protease. Our results on the stabilizing mutations of
1AT provide insight into the unusual packing nature of the molecule that appears to be the structural basis of the strain of its native form. Our results also indicate that a substantial portion of the structural components interacting with sheet A of
1AT, the major ß-sheet, is designed to be flexible and underpacked to allow complete opening of sheet A during complex formation with a target protease. | Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1AT expression in Escherichia coli and the purification of recombinant proteins were described previously (Kwon et al. 1994). Mutations were induced by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis and confirmed by sequencing. Ultrapure guanidine hydrochloride was purchased from ICN. Porcine pancreatic elastase and N-succinyl-(Ala)3-p-nitroanilide were purchased from Sigma. All other reagents were of analytical grade.
Cavity mapping
The atomic coordinates for the crystal structure of wild-type
1AT were taken from the PDB protein databank (code ID: 2psi, now updated to 1qlp) (Elliott et al. 1998). Cavities were identified (Alard and Wodak 1992) and their volumes calculated analytically using the program SurVol (Alard 1991). The atomic radii used were those of Chothia (1975). The probe radius was set to 1.4 Å. The volumes reported throughout this paper are molecular volumes (total empty space), which include the volumes of the probe as well as the excluded volumes (Lee and Richards 1971; Richards 1977).
Equilibrium unfolding and determination of stability change
Conformational stability of
1AT variants was determined by guanidine-induced equilibrium unfolding in 10 mM phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 6.5) at 25°C. Native
1AT was diluted into the appropriate guanidine solution and incubated for about 4 h at 25°C. The final protein concentration was 5 µg/mL. The equilibrium unfolding of
1AT was monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy, with excitation at 280 nm and emission at 360 nm (slit width, 5 nm for both). Experimental data of the fluorescence measurement were fitted to a two-state unfolding model, details of which were described previously (Kwon et al. 1994). Changes in the free energy of unfolding (
G) of the mutant proteins were determined according to Pace et al. (1989). Briefly, it was calculated with the fitted thermodynamic parameters and the equation
, where
Cm is the difference between the value of Cm, equilibrium transition midpoint, for wild-type and mutant protein, and <m> is the average of the "m-value," a measure of the dependence of the free energy of unfolding (
G) on denaturant concentration.
Determination of stoichiometry of inhibition
The stoichiometry of inhibition was determined as described (Rubin et al. 1990). Various amounts of
1AT variants were incubated with 100 nM porcine pancreatic elastase in 50 µL of assay buffer (30 mM phosphate, 160 mM NaCl, 0.1% PEG 8000, 0.1% Triton X-100 at pH 7.4). After incubation for 10 min at 37°C, the reaction mixture was diluted 10-fold with the same buffer, and the residual protease activity was determined using N-succinyl-(Ala)3-p-nitroanilide as a substrate. The activity inhibition was extrapolated to yield the minimum molar ratio of
1AT to the protease giving 100% inhibition.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alard, P. 1991. "Calculs de surface et d'energie dans le domaine des macromolecules." Ph.D. thesis, University of Libre de Bruxelles.
Alard, P. and Wodak, S.J. 1992. Detection of cavities in a set of interpenetrating spheres. J. Comput. Chem. 12: 918922.[CrossRef]
Bullough, P.A., Hughson, F.M., Skehel, J.J., and Wiley, D.C. 1994. Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion. Nature 371: 3743.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carr, C.M. and Kim, P.S. 1993. A spring-loaded mechanism for the conformational change of influenza hemagglutinin. Cell 73: 823832.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carr, C.M., Chaudhry, C., and Kim, P.S. 1997. Influenza hemagglutinin is spring-loaded by a metastable native conformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 1430614313.
Chothia, C. 1975. Structural invariants in protein folding. Nature 254: 304308.[CrossRef][Medline]
Daopin, S., Alber, T., Baase, W.A., Wozniak, J.A., and Matthews, B.W. 1991. Structural and thermodynamic analysis of packing of two
-helices in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 221: 647667.[CrossRef][Medline]
Elliott, P.R., Abrahams, J.P., and Lomas, D.A. 1998. Wild-type
1-antitrypsin is in the canonical inhibitory conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 275: 419425.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eriksson, A.E., Baase, W.A., Zhang, X.J., Heinz, D.W., Blaber, M., Baldwin, E.P., and Matthews, B.W. 1992. Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Science 255: 178183.
Huber, R. and Carrell, R.W. 1989. Implications of the three-dimensional structure of
1-antitrypsin for structure and function of serpins. Biochemistry 28: 89518966.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huntington, J.A., Read, R.J., and Carrell, R.W. 2000. Structure of a serpinprotease complex shows inhibition by deformation. Nature 407: 923926.[CrossRef][Medline]
Im, H. and Yu, M.-H. 2000. Role of Lys335 in the metastability and function of inhibitory serpins. Prot. Sci. 9: 934941.[Abstract]
Im, H., Seo, E.J., and Yu, M.-H. 1999. Metastability in the inhibitory mechanism of human
1-antitrypsin. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 1107211077.
Karpusas, M., Baase, W.A., Matsumura, M., and Matthews, B.W. 1989. Hydrophobic packing in T4 lysozyme probed by cavity-filling mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86: 82378241.
Kraulis, P.J. 1991. MOLSCRIPT. A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structure. J. App. Crystallogr. 24: 946950.[CrossRef]
Kwon, K.-S., Kim, J., Shin, H.S., and Yu, M.-H. 1994. Single amino acid substitutions of
1-antitrypsin that confer enhancement in thermal stability. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 96279731.
Lawrence, D.A., Ginsburg, D., Day, D.E., Berkenpas, M.B., Verhamme, I.M., Kvassman, J.-O., and Shore, J.D. 1995. Serpinprotease complexes are trapped as stable acylenzyme intermediates. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 2530925312.
Lawrence, D.A., Olson, S.T., Muhammad, S., Day, D.E., Kvassman, J.-O., Ginsburg, D., and Shore, J.D. 2000. Partitioning of serpinproteinase reactions between stable inhibition and substrate cleavage is regulated by the rate of serpin reactive center loop insertion into ß-sheet A. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 58395844.
Lee, B. 1993. Estimation of the maximum change in stability of globular proteins upon mutation of a hydrophobic residue to another of smaller size. Prot. Sci. 2: 733738.[Abstract]
Lee, B. and Richards, F.M. 1971. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55: 379400.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, B. and Vasmatzis, G. 1997. Stabilization of protein structures. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 8: 423428.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, C., Park, S.-H., Lee, M.-Y., and Yu, M.-H. 2000. Regulation of protein function by native metastability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 77277731.
Lee, K.N., Park, S.D., and Yu, M.-H. 1996. Probing the native strain in
1-antitrypsin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3: 497500.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ohmura, T., Ueda, T., Ootsuka, K., Saito, M., and Imoto, T. 2001. Stabilization of hen egg white lysozyme by a cavity-filling mutation. Prot. Sci. 10: 313320.
Orosz, A., Wisniewski, J., and Wu, C. 1996. Regulation of Drosophila heat shock factor trimerization: Global sequence requirements and independence of nuclear localization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 70187030.[Abstract]
Pace, C.N. 1992. Contribution of the hydrophobic effect to globular protein stability. J. Mol. Biol. 226: 2935.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pace, C.N., Shirley, B.A., and Thomson, J.A. 1989. Measuring the conformational stability of a protein. In Protein structure: A practical approach (ed. T.E. Creighton), pp. 311330. IRL, New York.
Rashin, A.A., Iofin, M., and Honig, B. 1986. Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins. Biochemistry 25: 36193625.[CrossRef][Medline]
Richards, F.M. 1974. The interpretation of protein structures: Total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J. Mol. Biol. 82: 14.[CrossRef][Medline]
. 1977. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 6: 151176.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rubin, H., Wang, Z.M., Nickbarg, E.B., McLarney, S., Naidoo, N., Schoenberger, O.L., Johnson, J.L., and Cooperman, B.S. 1990. Cloning, expression, purification, and biological activity of recombinant native and variant human
1-antichymotrypsins. J. Biol. Chem. 265: 11991207.
Ryu, S.-E., Choi, H.-J., Kwon, K.-S., Lee, K.N., and Yu, M.-H. 1996. The native strains in the hydrophobic core and flexible reactive loop of a serine protease inhibitor: Crystal structure of an uncleaved
1-antitrypsin at 2.7 Å. Structure 4: 11811192.[Medline]
Sayle, R. and Milner-White, E.J. 1995. RasMol: Biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 374376.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seo, E.J., Im, H., Maeng J.-S., Kim, K.E., and Yu, M.-H. 2000. Distribution of the native strain in human
1-antitrypsin and its association with protease inhibitor function. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 1690416909.
Shore, J.D., Day, D.E., Francis-Chmura, A.M., Verhamme, I., Kvassman, J., Lawrence, D.A., and Ginsburg, D. 1995. A fluorescent probe study of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1: Evidence for reactive center loop insertion and its role in the inhibitory mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 53955398.
Stefansson, S. and Lawrence, D.A. 1996. The serpin PAI-1 inhibits cell migration by blocking integrin
vß3 binding to vitronectin. Nature 383: 441443.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stein, P.E. and Carrell, R.W. 1995. What do dysfunctional serpins tell us about molecular mobility and disease? Nat. Struct. Biol. 2: 96113.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilczynska, M., Fa, M., Ohlsson, P.-I., and Ny, T. 1995. The inhibition mechanism of serpins: Evidence that the mobile reactive center loop is cleaved in the native proteaseinhibitor complex. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 2965229655.
Wiley, D.C. and Skehel, J.J. 1987. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 56: 365394.[CrossRef][Medline]
Williams, M., Goodfellow, J.M., and Thornton, J.M. 1994. Buried waters and internal cavities in monomeric proteins. Prot. Sci. 3: 12241235.[Abstract]
Wright, H.T. and Scarsdale, J.N. 1995. Structural basis for serpin inhibitor activity. Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet. 22: 210225.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Liu, N. Mushero, L. Hedstrom, and A. Gershenson Short-lived protease serpin complexes: Partial disruption of the rat trypsin active site Protein Sci., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2403 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Baek, H. Im, U.-B. Kang, K. M. Seong, C. Lee, J. Kim, and M.-H. Yu Probing the local conformational change of {alpha}1-antitrypsin Protein Sci., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1842 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D A Lomas and H Parfrey {alpha}1-Antitrypsin deficiency * 4: Molecular pathophysiology Thorax, June 1, 2004; 59(6): 529 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Im, M.-J. Ryu, and M.-H. Yu Engineering thermostability in serine protease inhibitors Protein Eng. Des. Sel., April 1, 2004; 17(4): 325 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Parfrey, R. Mahadeva, N. A. Ravenhill, A. Zhou, T. R. Dafforn, R. C. Foreman, and D. A. Lomas Targeting a Surface Cavity of {alpha}1-Antitrypsin to Prevent Conformational Disease J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33060 - 33066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Im, M.-S. Woo, K. Y. Hwang, and M.-H. Yu Interactions Causing the Kinetic Trap in Serpin Protein Folding J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46347 - 46354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Seo, C. Lee, and M.-H. Yu Concerted Regulation of Inhibitory Activity of alpha 1-Antitrypsin by the Native Strain Distributed throughout the Molecule J. Biol. Chem., April 12, 2002; 277(16): 14216 - 14220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |