|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Pathology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
3 Division of Structural Biology, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Reprint requests to: Dr. Luis M. de la Maza, Department of Pathology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 926974800, USA; e-mail: lmdelama{at}uci.edu; fax: (949) 824-2160.
(RECEIVED August 30, 2001; FINAL REVISION March 1, 2002; ACCEPTED March 26, 2002)
Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.3650102.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Keywords: Chlamydia; major outer-membrane protein (MOMP); porin; topology model
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chlamydia are characterized by a unique developmental cycle involving a metabolically inactive infectious form, the elementary body (EB), that after invading the eukaryotic cell differentiates into a metabolically active form called the reticulate body (RB), which is responsible for intracellular replication (Moulder et al. 1984). The MOMP accounts for 60% of the mass of the outer membrane of the EBs (Caldwell et al. 1981; Hatch et al. 1981). Alignment and comparison of MOMP sequences from all the C. trachomatis serovars and C. psittaci have revealed the existence of five constant and four variable domains (VDs) (Stephens et al. 1987; Fitch et al. 1993).
Preliminary evidence suggests that MOMP may have a porin-like function (Bavoil et al. 1984; Wyllie et al. 1998). Bacterial porins are an unorthodox class among integral membrane proteins because their primary sequences are abundant in charged residues, and no hydrophobic stretches long enough to span the membrane as
-helices can be identified (for review, see Schirmer 1998). Structural studies have shown that bacterial porins are folded into a closed barrel-like ß-pleated sheet structure delimiting a pore. Consequently, conventional hydropathy methods that predict membrane-spanning segments based on
-helix structures are inadequate for this class of membrane protein (Jeanteur et al. 1991, 1994).
Here, we have predicted the topology of C. trachomatis MOMP using the hydrophobicity algorithm of Schirmer and Cowan (1993) and an artificial neural network (Diederichs et al. 1998). The combination of both methods, the results of which were in excellent agreement, allowed us to propose the topology of MOMP.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.6 are likely to indicate membrane-spanning ß-strands. As observed with other porins, they occur in pairs as two strands joined by a short loop at the periplasmic end of the barrel, well separated by long loops that are exposed at the cell surface.
|
Artificial neural network
To corroborate the above results, we employed an artificial neural network (ANN) that had previously been trained with a set of seven outer-membrane porins with known high-resolution structures (Diederichs et al. 1998). The ANN predicts the z-coordinates of C
atoms with regard to the outer membrane in the xy-plane. Thus, high z-values indicate long extracellular loops, while low z-values correspond to periplasmic loops. Applying this ANN to MoPn MOMP gave the graph shown in Figure 1B
. By design, the ANN will fail to identify short extracellular segments such as loop L4. In MoPn MOMP, the sixth extracellular loop, which corresponds to VD4, contains a nonapeptide conserved among chlamydial species. Because of its proximity to the outer membrane, the ANN identifies this region as a transmembrane segment, nevertheless some immunological studies have shown this conserved region is neither a trans-membrane nor surface exposed. Thus, we propose that this loop is comprised of two well-defined segments protruding outside the cell, termed for clarity L6 and L6a in Figure 1B and 1C
, separated by the conserved nonapeptide in close proximity to the outer membrane.
Two-dimensional model
The two-dimensional (2-D) model of Figure 1C
shows the proposed topology of C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP. We used four criteria to assign residues to transmembrane segments: (1) A ß-side hydrophobicity index Hs'>0.6; (2) Seven to nine residues are needed to span the core of the membrane with every second residue being hydrophobic and thus, positive and negative Hs' alternate; (3) A z-value C
between 0.5 and 0.3 given by the ANN; and (4) Segments with high sequence variability (VD) are excluded by negative inference based on immunological, biochemical, and evolutionary evidence, as discussed below.
The model depicts the protein as an unrolled ß-barrel viewed from the outside. The 16 ß-sheet membrane-spanning segments are represented by tilted squares and account for approximately one-third of all the amino-acid residues. The residues facing away from the pore are represented in bold, while nonbold, tilted squares indicate the residues with side chains that face the pore. All of the residues facing away from the pore are hydrophobic or aromatic, with the exception of D34, D108, H244, D311, and K322. The model also reveals an abundance of aromatic residues along the upper and lower ends of the ß-strands, located at the junction between hydrophobic and hydrophilic environments. The barrel edge in contact with the periplasmic space exhibits a pattern of alternating Phe and Tyr. Aliphatic residues in the middle of the ß-barrel form a nonpolar ribbon in contact with the membrane lipids. The side of the MOMP facing the outside of the cell predominantly exhibits long loops, while the turns facing the periplasmic space are short. The external loops contain numerous charged side chains, mostly Asp, and to a lesser extent, Glu.
Analysis using the FORESST program
The FORESST program found MOMP to more closely fit its porin model than other possible structural models. The homology between the porin consensus model and our predicted secondary structure (Fig. 1D
) was statistically significant (Z = 3.30). The primary difference between the two was that the MOMP contained additional residues in the VDs. These segments are on the large external loops in our model (Fig. 1C
). When we shortened the length of the large loops by removing the VDs, the FORESST Z-score increased from 3.30 to 4.04. This supports the hypothesis that MOMP is a porin and that the VDs lie on large external loops.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Crystallization of membrane proteins poses significant technical challenges and, as a result, only a handful of tertiary structures have been solved (Schulz 2000). In the absence of the tertiary structure of the Chlamydia MOMP, we have built a model of the topography of this protein using the structural prediction algorithm of Schirmer and Cowan (1993) and the artificial neural network of Diederichs et al. (1998).
Our model exhibits several structural features that have been identified as common to nonspecific bacterial porins (Schulz 2000). The Chlamydia MOMP has 16 ß-sheets spanning the depth of the membrane forming a barrel-like structure with long loops protruding out of the cell, while short turns face the periplasmic space. Its barrel-forming amino acids have hydrophilic and hydrophobic characteristics alternating in a way such that the residues facing the pore are in contact with water, while those facing away from the pore are in contact with the membrane lipids. The model also shows the relative abundance of aromatic residues along the upper and lower ends of the ß-strands, located at the interface between the hydrophobic and the hydrophilic environment. This "girdle" of aromatic residues lining the boundaries of the ß-barrel has been described in other bacterial porins (Schulz 1994). Schulz (1994) proposed that the function of the Tyr-Phe girdle was to prevent conformational damage of the porin during mechanical movements in the membrane. Like other bacterial porins, the chlamydial MOMP also has a band of middle-sized, nonpolar residues located in the mid-section of the ß-barrel (Schulz 1994). Only the first eight N-terminal amino acids were not assigned by our prediction.
An alternative assignment of the transmembrane segments of the MoPn MOMP suggests the presence of 18 ß-strands. In this model, the two extra strands would occupy positions five and six, which would be located between loops L2 and L3, and correspond to residues assigned to loop L3 on the 16-strand model of Figure 1c
. Even though the topology predicted by the hydrophobicity algorithm does not allow the ruling out of the existence of 18 transmembrane segments, the prediction of the z-coordinates by the ANN algorithm does not support the presence of neither transmembrane segments nor external loops. Therefore, an 18 ß-strand model most likely can be excluded based on the combined results of these two prediction methods.
On the MOMP external loops, we found a large number of Asp (18) and Glu (9) residues. The side chains of Asp and Glu have been reported to participate in the binding to the carboxylate groups of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) through divalent cations such as calcium and magnesium (Cowan et al. 1992). Nevertheless, not all the negatively charged residues are located on the external loops. Three Asp residues and two Glu are part of the small turns facing the periplasmic side of the membrane. Negatively charged residues also can be seen in the periplasmic turns of the porins from Rodopseudomonas blastica and Escherichia coli OmpF (Cowan et al. 1992; Kreusch et al. 1994). Furthermore, as expected, residues with the highest bend potential, Gly, Pro, Asp, Tyr, Lys, and Ser, are well represented in the periplasmic turns of the MoPn MOMP (Chou and Fasman 1978).
Chlamydial MOMPs differ from other porins of gram-negative bacteria in that they possess a large number (7 to 10) of Cys residues (Stephens et al. 1987; Stephens, 1999). The ability of MOMP to form intra- and intermolecular disulfide bonds with outer-membrane, cysteine-rich proteins is thought to contribute to the rigidity of the EB, which lacks the peptidoglycan layer found in other gram-negative bacteria (Bavoil et al. 1984; Moulder et al. 1984; Hatch 1996). Our predicted topology of the MoPn MOMP assigns seven of the eight Cys residues to the external loops, while the only Cys crossing the membrane (C204) is poorly conserved among serovars. Interestingly, six of the seven Cys located in the external loops are in L1, L4, and L7, three of the four shorter loops that do not have sequence variation. These three loops are in close proximity to L2, the loop that may act as a latch to stabilize the formation of the porin trimers (see below). Thus, it is possible that loops L1, L4, and L7, by being in or close to the trimer interface, may provide rigidity to the membrane of the EB by way of disulfide bonds, while at the same time allowing the necessary plasticity to the membrane for the RB to form following reduction of the disulfide bridges (Hackstadt et al. 1985). Furthermore, the location of the Cys residues in this model suggests that the MOMP cannot form disulfide bonds with other proteins unless they are surface exposed. In this respect, the N terminus of the 60-kDa, cysteine-rich protein is thought to extend to the surface of the bacterial cell (Everett and Hatch 1995; Mygind et al. 1998).
The functional characterization of the external loops presents a challenge because of their exceptionally high sequence variability (Welte et al. 1991; Schulz 2000). In the E. coli OmpF, of the eight surface exposed loops, the second (L2) connects one subunit with its neighbor by latching into its pore and stabilizing the trimers that are common among bacterial porins (Phale et al. 1998). Residue E71 on L2 forms salt bridges and hydrogen bonds with R100 and R132 on the channel wall in the adjacent subunit. In the case of the chlamydial MOMP, formation of trimers has been suggested although not yet proven (McCafferty et al. 1995; Wyllie et al. 1998). If the second loop (L2), containing VD1, is also the latching loop in chlamydial MOMP, the trimer interface could approximately correspond to the constant domains CD1 and CD5. If a similar latching mechanism is taking place in Chlamydia, a negatively charged residue (E82 in MoPn MOMP) at the end of VD1 conserved in 53 of the 58 MOMP sequences analyzed by Bush and Everett (2001) stands out as a likely candidate. Alternatively, an adjacent, highly conserved (in 55 out of 58 sequences aligned) Arg residue (R81 in MoPn MOMP) also could be involved.
In porins, the third loop (L3) extends inside the pore and is attached to the barrel wall, whereby considerably constricting the lumen of the pore (Cowan et al. 1992). An asymmetrical arrangement of positive and negative charges at the constriction site causes a strong electrostatic field parallel to the plane of the membrane that spreads along the channel governing ion selectivity. In the E. coli OmpF, a positively charged cluster formed by three Arg (R42, R82, and R132) protrudes from the barrel wall to face two negatively charged acidic side chains (D113 and E117) located on L3 (Saint et al. 1996; Phale et al. 2001). We have examined the topology predicted for C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP in search of a similar asymmetrical charge distribution. Loop L3 of the MoPn MOMP is negatively charged with four acidic residues (3 Asp and 1 Glu) and two basic residues (Arg and Lys). Basic residues are, by comparison, more abundant in the transmembrane segments: R39, R50, R109, and R173 located in or close to strands 2, 3, 5, and 7, as it was found in E. coli OmpF (Phale et al. 2001).
As can be seen in Figures 1A and 1B
, VD3 and part of VD4 are predicted as transmembrane segments. This assignment has to be rejected on immunological, biochemical, and evolutionary evidence. Already in the original paper by Schirmer and Cowan (1993), it was shown that the Hs' algorithm can produce false positives. Immunological studies and immunoelectronmicroscopy, for example, have shown that mice inoculated with Chlamydia produce antibodies against all four VDs of the MOMP (Kuo and Chi 1987; Baehr et al. 1988; Baghian et al. 1990; Andersen 1991; Peterson et al. 1991; Pal et al. 1993, 1996, 1997a, Pal et al. b, 2000; Qu et al. 1993; Villeneuve et al. 1994). Like with Neisseria gonorrhoeae only the long loops L2, L3, L5, and L6 of C. trachomatis and C. psittaci have VDs probably reflecting the fact that they are more immunoaccessible (van der Ley et al. 1991). Loops L1, L4, and L7 are not only shorter than the loops containing the VDs but, as previously discussed, also have numerous Cys residues probably involved in disulfide bonding and thus, imposing a significant restriction on structural changes (see above). In the case of C. pneumoniae however, the lack of sequence variability suggests that the MOMP is immunorecessive, or it is not surface accessible (Christiansen et al. 1999; Wolf et al. 2001).
Alignment of MOMP sequences from different chlamydial species and serovars identified a conserved nonapeptide within the highly variable VD4: TTWNPTISG (indicated in bold hexagons in Fig. 1C
and corresponding to the sequence TTLNPTIAG in the MOMP of the human C. trachomatis serovars (Stephens et al. 1987; Fitch et al. 1993). The algorithms employed here suggest that this invariant region is a putative transmembrane segment. However, the assignment of loops L6 and L6a immediately before and after this nonapeptide argues otherwise. Su et al. (1990) suggested that this conserved region functions as a cryptic hydrophobic binding site responsible for Chlamydia-host cell interactions. Epitope mapping supports the assumption that this region is not a transmembrane segment. The monoclonal antibody MoPn 132 binds to this region of the MoPn MOMP (Pal et al. 1997b). Also, the subspecies-specific monoclonal antibody E4 binds to this invariant region TLNPTIA within the VD4 of all the human chlamydial serovars (Peterson et al. 1988). In vitro, this antibody reacted by immunofluorescence and dot-blot ELISA with native EB of the B- and C-related complexes, but it reacted only with heat-treated EB of the C complex. The fact that a mild treatment exposes this binding site suggests that, even in the members of the C complex, this epitope is not buried in the membrane.
Enzyme digestion, biochemical analysis, and substitution-rate studies also support the location of the VDs outside the membrane. For example, the infectivity of serovar L2 was resistant to treatment with trypsin, while infectivity of the B serovar was significantly reduced following digestion with this enzyme (Su et al. 1988). Comparison of the VD2 and VD4 showed a trypsin-sensitive Lys residue in each of these two sites on the B serovar, while the MOMP of the L2 serovar was cleaved only at the Lys in VD4. Based on these findings, it was concluded that VD2 and VD4 are surface exposed and play a critical role on chlamydial infectivity. Recently, Hughes et al. (2001) showed that a recombinant MOMP in which the VD4 was deleted retained its ability to form pore channels, indicating VD4 is not directly involved in the pore function.
The assignment of VDs to surface-exposed loops also is consistent with the results of Brunham et al. (1994), who found a higher rate of nonsynonymous than synonymous substitutions in the MOMP VDs. This pattern suggests the action of positive selection. Very few genes show evidence of positive selection. The major class of such genes is pathogen surface proteins (van der Ley et al. 1991; Smith et al. 1995; Endo et al. 1996; Bush et al. 1999; Yamaguchi-Kabata and Gojobori 2000; Bush 2001). Here, the hypervariability of the VDs probably helps the pathogen to evade recognition by the immune system of the host.
In summary, we are proposing a topology scheme for the MOMP of Chlamydia consistent with immunological, biochemical, and evolutionary data. The model should help to understand the role of MOMP in the pathogenesis of this microorganism, to develop preventive and therapeutic measures, and to assist in planning further experiments to advance our knowledge of the structure of this protein.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() |
To account for the observed preponderance of aromatic residues in flanking positions, the method assigns an arbitrarily increased "hydrophobicity index" of 1.6 to aromatic residues when found in positions i-2 or i+4.
Topology prediction using an artificial neural network
An ANN trained to predict the topology of bacterial outer-membrane proteins with a predominance of ß-strands was applied to the MOMP sequences (Diederichs et al. 1998). This ANN, available online (http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de), predicts the z-coordinate of C
atoms in a coordinate frame with the outer membrane in the xy-plane, such that low z-values (<0.3) indicate periplasmic turns, medium z-values indicate transmembrane ß-strands, and high z-values (
0.6) indicate extracellular loops.
Secondary structure comparisons with known porins
We used the computer program FORESST (Fold Recognition from Secondary Structures, Release 1.0, http://absalpha.cit.nih.gov/) to determine the degree of homology between our predicted secondary structure model and a data set of 349 proteins of known structure (Di Francesco et al. 1999; Geetha et al. 1999). Our query sequence consisted of a string of 365 letters, each representing a position in the MoPn MOMP protein sequence. FORESST provides results as Z-scores, which are the number of standard deviations by which the hidden Markov score for the query sequence was above the average score for the family model using a random protein (Cowan et al. 1992; Kreusch et al. 1994). Comparisons with z-scores of 3.0 and higher are considered significantly homologous.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baehr, W., Zhang, Y-X., Joseph, T., Su H., Nano, F.E., Everett, K.D.E., and Caldwell, H.D. 1988. Mapping antigenic domains expressed by Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 40004004.
Baghian, A,, Shaffer, L., and Storz, J. 1990. Antibody response to epitopes of chlamydial major outer membrane proteins on infectious elementary bodies and of the reduced polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis-separated form. Infect. Immun. 58: 13791383.
Bavoil, P., Ohlin, A., and Schachter, J. 1984. Role of disulfide bonding in outer membrane structure and permeability in Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect. Immun. 44: 479485.
Brunham, R., Yang, C., Maclean, I., Kimani, J., Maitha, G., and Plummer, F. 1994. Chlamydia trachomatis from individuals in a sexually transmitted disease core group exhibit frequent sequence variation in the major outer membrane protein (omp1) gene. J. Clin. Invest. 94: 456463.
Brunham, R.C., Zhang, D.J., Yang, X., and McClarty, G.M. 2000. The potential for vaccine development against chlamydial infection and disease. J. Infect. Dis. 155: 749755.
Bush, R.M. 2001. Predicting adaptive evolution. Nature Rev. Genetics 2: 387392.[Medline]
Bush, R.M., and Everett, K.D.E. 2001. Molecular evolution of the Chlamydiaceae. Int. J. Systematic Evol. Microbiol. 51: 203220.
Bush, R.M., Fitch, W.M., Bender, C.A., and Cox, N.J. 1999. Positive selection on the H3 hemagglutinin gene of human influenza virus A. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 14571465.[Abstract]
Caldwell, H.D., Kromhout, J., and Schachter, J. 1981. Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect. Immun. 31: 11611176.
Caldwell, H.D. and Perry, L.J. 1982. Neutralization of Chlamydia trachomatis infectivity with antibodies to the major outer membrane protein. Infect. Immun. 38: 745754.
Chou, P.Y. and Fasman, G.D. 1978. Empirical predictions of protein conformation. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 47: 215276.
Christiansen, G., Boesen, T., Hjerno, K., Daugaard, L., Mygind, P., Madsen, A.S., Knudsen, K., Falk E., and Birkelund, S. 1999. Molecular biology of Chlamydia pneumoniae surface proteins and their role in immunopathogenesis. Am. Heart J. 138: S491S495.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cowan, S.W., Schirmer, T., Rummel, G., Steiert, M., Ghosh, R., Pauptit, R.A., Jansonius, J.N., and Rosenbusch, J.P. 1992. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature 358: 727733.[CrossRef][Medline]
de la Maza, L.M. and de la Maza, M.A. 1995. A new computer model for estimating the impact of vaccination protocols and its application to the study of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Vaccine 13: 119127.[CrossRef][Medline]
Destenaves, B. and Thomas, F. 2000. New advances in pharmacogenomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4: 440444.[CrossRef][Medline]
Diederichs, K., Freigang, J., Umhau, S., Zeth, K., and Breed, J. 1998. Prediction by a neural network of outer membrane ß-strand protein topology. Protein Sci. 7: 24132420.[Abstract]
Di Francesco, V., Munson, P.J., and Garnier, J. 1999. FORESST: Fold recognition from secondary structure predictions of proteins. Bioinformatics 15: 131140.
Endo, T., Ikeo, K., and Gojobori, T. 1996. Large-scale search for genes on which positive selection may operate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 685690.[Abstract]
Everett, K.D.E., Bush, R.M., and Andersen, A.A. 1999. Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of two new families and species, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae including a new genus and five new species, and standard for the identification of organisms. Intern. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49: 415440.
Everett, K.D.E. and Hatch, T.P. 1995. Architecture of the cell envelope of Chlamydia psittaci 6BC. J. Bacteriol. 177: 877882.
Fitch, W.M., Peterson, E.M., and de la Maza, L.M. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of the outer membrane protein genes of Chlamydiae, and its implication for vaccine development. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 892913.[Abstract]
Geetha, V., di Francesco, V., Garnier, J., and Munson, P.J. 1999. Comparing protein sequence-based and predicted secondary structure-based methods for identification of remote homologs. Prot. Eng. 12: 527534.
Hackstadt, T., Scidemore, M.A., and Rockey, D.D. 1995. Lipid metabolism in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells: Directed trafficking of Golgi-derived sphingolipids to the chlamydial inclusions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 48774881.
Hackstadt, T., Todd, W.J., and Caldwell, H.D. 1985. Disulfide-mediated interaction of the chlamydial major outer membrane protein: Role in the differentiation of chlamydiae. J. Bacteriol. 161: 2531.
Hatch, T.P. 1996. Disulfide cross-linked envelope proteins: The functional equivalent of peptidoglycan in chlamydiae? J. Bacteriol. 178: 15.
Hatch, T.P., Vance, D.W., and Al-Hossainy, E. 1981. Identification of a major envelope protein in Chlamydia spp. J. Bacteriol. 146: 426429.
Hughes, E.S., Shaw, K.M., and Ashley, R.H. 2001. Mutagenesis and functional reconstitution of chlamydial major outer membrane proteins: VS4 domains are not required for pore formation but modify channel function. Infect. Immun. 69: 16711678.
Jeanteur, D., Lakey, J.H., and Pattus, F. 1991. The bacterial porin superfamily: Sequence alignment and structure prediction. Mol. Microbiol. 5: 21532164.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jeanteur, D., Lakey, J., and Pattus, F. 1994. The porin superfamily: Diversity and common features. In Bacterial cell wall, (eds. J-M. Ghuysen and R. Hankenbeck) pp. 363380. Elsevier Science B.V., New York.
Klebe, G. 2000. Recent developments in structure-based drug design. J. Mol. Med. 78: 245246.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kuo, C-C. and Chi, E.Y. 1987. Ultrastructural study of Chlamydia trachomatis surface antigens by immunogold staining with monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 55: 13241328.
Kreusch, A., Neubüser, A., Schiltz, E., Weckesser, J., and Schulz, G.E. 1994. Structure of the membrane channel porin from Rhodopseudomonas blastica at 2.0 Å resolution. Protein Sci. 3: 5863.[Abstract]
McCafferty, M.C., Herring, A.J., Andersen, A.A., and Jones, G.E. 1995. Electrophoretic analysis of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia psittaci reveals multimers which are recognized by protective monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun. 63: 23872389.[Abstract]
Moulder, J.W., Hatch, T.P., Kuo, C-C., Schachter, J., and Storz, J. 1984. Genus Chlamydia. In Bergey's manual of systemic bacteriology (ed. N.R. Krieg), pp. 729739. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore.
Mygind, P., Christiansen, G., and Birkelund, S. 1998. Topological analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis L2 outer membrane protein 2. J. Bacteriol. 180: 57845787.
Nigg, C. 1942. Unidentified virus which produces pneumonia and systemic infection in mice. Science 95: 4959.
Pal, S., Cheng, X., Peterson, E.M., and de la Maza, L.M. 1993. Mapping of a surface-exposed B-cell epitope to the variable sequent 3 of the major outer-membrane proteins of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139: 15651570.[Medline]
Pal, S., Peterson, E.M., and de la Maza, L.M. 1996. Intranasal immunization induces long-term protection in mice against a Chlamydia trachomatis genital challenge. Infect. Immun. 64: 53415348.[Abstract]
Pal, S., Rangel, J., Peterson, E.M., and de la Maza, L.M. 2000. Immunogenic and protective ability of the two developmental forms of Chlamydiae in a mouse model of infertility. Vaccine 18: 752761.
Pal, S., Theodor, I., Peterson, E.M., and de la Maza, L.M. 1997a. Immunization with an acellular vaccine consisting of the outer membrane complex of Chlamydia trachomatis induces protection against a genital challenge. Infect. Immun. 65: 33613369.[Abstract]
Pal, S., Theodor, I., Peterson, E.M., and de la Maza, L.M. 1997b. Monoclonal immunoglobulin A antibody to the major outer membrane protein of the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis biovar protects mice against a chlamydial genital challenge. Vaccine 15: 575582.[CrossRef][Medline]
Peterson. E.M., Cheng. X., Markoff. B.A., Fielder. T.J., and de la Maza. L.M. 1991. Functional and structural mapping of Chlamydia trachomatis species-specific major outer membrane protein epitopes by use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 59: 41474153.
Peterson, E.M. and de la Maza, L.M. 1988. Chlamydia parasitism: Ultrastructural characterization of the interaction between the chlamydial cell envelope and the host cell. J. Bacteriol. 170: 13891392.
Peterson, E.M., Zhong, G., Carlson, E., de la Maza, L.M. 1988. Protective role of magnesium in the neutralization by antibodies of Chlamydia trachomatis infectivity. Infect. Immun. 56: 885891.
Phale, P.S., Philippsen, A., Kiefhaber, T., Koebnik, R., Phale, V.P.. Schirmer, T., and Rosenbusch, J.P. 1998. Stability of trimeric OmpF porin: The contributions of the latching loop L2. Biochemistry 37: 1566315670.[CrossRef][Medline]
Phale, P.S., Philippsen, A., Widmer, C., Phale, V.P., Rosenbusch, J.P., and Schirmer, T. 2001. Role of charged residues at the E. coli OmpF porin channel constriction probed by mutagenesis and simulation. Biochemistry 40: 63196325.[CrossRef][Medline]
Qu, Z., Cheng, X., de la Maza, L.M., and Peterson E.M. 1993. Characterization of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody directed at variable domain I of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis C-complex serovars. Infect. Immun. 64: 13651370.
Raulston, J.E.. 1995. Chlamydial envelope components and pathogen-host cell interactions. Mol. Microbiol. 15: 607616.[CrossRef][Medline]
Saint, N., Lou, K-L., Widmer, C., Luckey, M., Schirmer, T., and Rosenbusch, J.P. 1996. Structural and functional characterization of OmpF porin mutants selected for larger pore size. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 2067620680.
Schachter, J. and Dawson, C.R. 1978. Human chlamydial infections. PSG Publishing Co., Littleton, MA.
Schirmer, T. 1998. General and specific porins from bacterial outer membranes. J. Struct. Biol. 121: 101109.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schirmer, T. and Cowan, S.W. 1993. Prediction of membrane-spanning ß-strands and its application to maltoporin. Protein Sci. 2: 13611363.[Medline]
Schulz, G.E. 1994. Structure-function relationships in porins as derived from a 1.8 Å resolution crystal structure. In Bacterial cell wall (eds. J.M. Ghuysen and R. Hankenbeck), pp. 343352. Elsevier Science B.V., New York.
Schulz, G.E. 2000. ß-barrel membrane proteins. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 10: 443447.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smith, N.H., Maynard Smith, J., and Spratt, B.G. 1995. Sequence evolution of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis: Evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 363370.[Abstract]
Stephens, R.S. 1999. Chlamydia: Intracellular biology, pathogenesis and immunology. ASM Press, Washington.
Stephens, R.S. 2000. Chlamydial genomics and vaccine antigen discovery. J. Infect. Dis. 181: S521S523.
Stephens, R.S., Sanchez-Pescador, R., Wager, E.A., Inouye, C., and Urdea, M.S. 1987. Diversity of Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein genes. J. Bacteriol. 169: 38793885.
Su, H., Watkins, N.G., Zhang, Y-X., Caldwell, H. 1990. Chlamydia trachomatis-host cell interactions: Role of the chlamydial major outer membrane protein as an adhesin. Infect. Immun. 58: 10171025.
Su, H., Zhang Y-X., Barrera, O., Watkins, N.G., and Caldwell, H.D. 1988. Differential effect of trypsin on infectivity of Chlamydia trachomatis: Loss of infectivity requires cleavage of major outer membrane protein variable domains II and IV. Infect. Immun. 56: 20942100.
van der Ley, P., Heckels, J.E., Virji, M., Hoogerhout, P., and Poolman, J.T. 1991. Topology of outer membrane porins in pathogenic Neisseria spp. Infect. Immun. 59: 29632971.
Villeneuve, A., Brossay, L., Paradis, G., and Hébert J. 1994. Determination of neutralizing epitopes in variable domains I and IV of the major outer membrane protein from Chlamydia trachomatis serovar K. Microbiol. 140: 24812487.[Abstract]
Wang, S-P. and Grayston, J.T. 1984. Microimmunofluorescence serology of Chlamydia trachomatis. In Medical virology III (eds. L.M. de la Maza and E.M. Peterson), pp. 87118. Elsevier Science Pub., New York.
Ward, M.E. 1992. Chlamydial vaccinesfuture trends. J. Infect. 25: 1126.
Welte, W., Weiss, M.S., Nestel, U., Weckesser, J., Schiltz, E., and Schulz, G.E. 1991. Prediction of the general structure of E. coli OmpF and PhoE from the sequence and structure of porin from Rhodobacter capsulatus. Orientation of porin in the membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1080: 271274.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wolf, K., Fischer, E., Mead, D., Zhong, G., Peeling, R., Whitmire, B., and Caldwell, H.D. 2001. Chlamydia pneumoniae major outer membrane protein is a surface-exposed antigen that elicits antibodies primarily directed against conformation-dependent determinants. Infect. Immun. 69: 30823091.
Wyllie, S., Ashley, R.H., Longbottom, D., and Herring, A.J. 1998. The major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia psittaci functions as a porin-like ion channel. Infect. Immun. 66: 52025207.
Yamaguchi-Kabata, Y. and Gojobori, T. 2000. Reevaluation of amino acid variability of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein and prediction of new discontinuous epitopes. J. Virol. 74: 43354350.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Sun, S. Pal, A. K. Sarcon, S. Kim, E. Sugawara, H. Nikaido, M. J. Cocco, E. M. Peterson, and L. M. de la Maza Structural and Functional Analyses of the Major Outer Membrane Protein of Chlamydia trachomatis J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2007; 189(17): 6222 - 6235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, E. A. Berg, X. Feng, L. Shen, T. Smith, C. E. Costello, and Y.-X. Zhang Identification of surface-exposed components of MOMP of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar F Protein Sci., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 122 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pal, E. M. Peterson, and L. M. de la Maza Vaccination with the Chlamydia trachomatis Major Outer Membrane Protein Can Elicit an Immune Response as Protective as That Resulting from Inoculation with Live Bacteria Infect. Immun., December 1, 2005; 73(12): 8153 - 8160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A Lister, S. N. Tabrizi, C. K. Fairley, A. Smith, P. H. Janssen, and S. Garland Variability of the Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 Gene Detected in Samples from Men Tested in Male-Only Saunas in Melbourne, Australia J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2004; 42(6): 2596 - 2601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Klein, A. Kotz, K. Bernardo, and M. Kronke Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae-Specific Antibodies Binding to the VD2 and VD3 Regions of the Major Outer Membrane Protein J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1957 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |