|
|
||||||||
1 Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-5230, USA
Reprint requests to: Sung-Hou Kim, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; e-mail: SHKim{at}cchem.berkeley.edu; fax: (510) 486-5272.
(RECEIVED January 15, 2003; FINAL REVISION April 2, 2003; ACCEPTED April 3, 2003)
Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.0302703.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helices. There is one disulfide bond between residues Cys35 and Cys265 in each monomer. One magnesium ion and one sulfate ion are bound in the active site. The superposition of active site residues with other HAD family members indicates that TM0651 is very likely a phosphatase that acts through the formation of a phosphoaspartate intermediate, which is supported by both NMR titration data and a biochemical assay. Structural and functional database searches and the presence of many aromatic residues in the interface of the two domains suggest the substrate of TM0651 is a carbohydrate molecule. From the crystal structure and NMR data, the protein likely undergoes a conformational change upon substrate binding. Keywords: X-ray crystallography; structural proteomics; phosphatase; HAD family; new fold; gi 4981173
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ß-hydrolase fold. Characteristic protein phosphoaspartate intermediates in this family function in signal transduction in two-component response regulator proteins (Welch et al. 1998), phosphotransfer reactions in phosphatases and mutases (Wang et al. 2002), and the conversion of chemical energy to ion gradients in P-type ATPases (Toyoshima et al. 2000).
|
An open reading frame of Thermotoga maritima codes for a hypothetical protein, TM0651, of 27.9 kD molecular mass (Nelson et al. 1999). A PSI-BLAST search of this sequence revealed around 180 proteins with full-length sequence identity ranging from 23% to 34% and an E-value below 4E-10. Most of the homologous sequences are annotated as putative hydrolases of the HAD superfamily. In the Pfam databases (Bateman et al. 2000), TM0651 matches with HAD-like hydrolase (Pfam00702) and trehalose phosphatase (Pfam02358). In Escherichia coli K12, the closest hypothetical protein to TM0651 is ybhA (Blattner et al. 1997). In Mycoplasma pneumoniae, the closest homolog MPN383 is an essential gene as assayed by global transposon mutagenesis (Hutchison et al. 1999).
We have determined the three-dimensional structure of TM0651, which belongs to the second group of the HAD superfamily, by X-ray crystallography and discuss structural characteristics of the protein.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
trace of the atomic model of TM0651 is shown in Figure 2B
ß)-sandwich, an architecture in a mixed
-ß class, according to the CATH classification (Fig. 2C
-helices. There is one disulfide bridge between Cys35 and Cys265 that may increase thermostability of TM0651 by decreasing the flexibility of the N- and C- terminal structure (Fig. 2B
-helices (Fig. 2B,C
We searched for TM0651's structural homologs in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with the program DALI (Holm and Sander 1997). As individual domain searches gave better matches compared to the whole protein search, we summarize the results of search for each domain. As expected from the sequence analysis, the DALI search revealed five HAD superfamily members that show a z-score above 10.0 for the core domain. The RMS deviations of these five with TM0651 are 2.3 Å (for 143 pairs of aligned C
atoms for YrbI from Haemophilus influenzae [HI1679]; 1j8d
[PDB]
-A; z = 18.0), 2.3 Å (for 133 C
atoms for phosphoserine phosphatase; 1f5s
[PDB]
-A; z = 14.4), 2.9 Å (for 135 C
atoms for phosphonoacetaldehyde hydrolase; 1fez
[PDB]
-A; z = 12.2), 2.6 Å (for 137 C
atoms for calcium-transporting ATPase; 1eul
[PDB]
; z = 10.9), and 2.7 Å (135 C
atoms for l-2-haloacid dehalogenase; 1qq5
[PDB]
-A; z = 10.6). An aspartic acid is believed to form a covalent intermediate with the substrate in all these proteins.
The cap domain did not show any high matches with other known structures (88 hits show a z-score between 2.0 and 4.3). The best hit was with a ribosome recycling factor with RMS deviation of 3.0 Å (for 63 C
atoms; 1ek8
[PDB]
; z = 4.3). However, the overall fold and topology of the two structures are different. Therefore, the cap domain has a unique structural topology.
In summary, a structural homology search indicated that TM0651 consists of one domain of known fold, and one domain of novel fold (Fig. 2B,C
).
Core domain and active site structure comparison
Comparison of the five best structural homologs of the core domain of TM0651 using the DALI search revealed a common structural motif in the HAD superfamily (Fig. 2B,C
). Five ß-stands surrounded by six
-helices were common in all structures of the core domain, although the last
-helix was not well conserved in the L-2-haloacid dehalogenase structure. All the active site residues were compared with those of PSP according to the detailed studies by Wang et al. (2001). All members showed that the highly conserved active site residues were located in almost the same position as in PSP. The positions of functional residues in TM0651, Asp10 (Asp 13 in PSP structure) known to act as a general base, Asp8 (Asp11 in PSP) acting as the nucleophile, K191 (K144 in PSP) stabilizing the transition state, and Ser41 (Ser99 in PSP) interacting with a bound phosphate, are well conserved in the structure (Fig. 3A
).
|
-helix via the hydrogen-bonding pattern between carbonyl oxygen of ith residue and nitrogen backbone atom of (i + 5)th residue. The position of backbone oxygen of Asp10 is unique in the TM0651 structure (Fig. 2A
In the active site of TM0651, there are one magnesium ion and one sulfate ion. The magnesium ion that was coordinated by Asp11, Asp167, and the phosphate ion in PSP interacts with Asp8, Asp214, and a sulfate ion in TM0651. The location of the sulfate ion is almost the same as that of the phosphate ion in the PSP structure (Fig. 3A
). The positions of four amide groups (Asp13, Ser14, Gly100, and Asn170) important for activity of PSP (Wang et al. 2001) are also similar in the TM0651 structure (Asp10, Gly11, Gly42, and Asn217, respectively). The reaction intermediate of TM0651 may be stabilized through interactions with Mg2+ as in PSP. The electrostatic surface potential of TM0651 indicates a strong negative charge distribution around the active site as shown in the other HAD family structures (Fig. 3B
).
When the core domain structure of TM0651 is compared with that of CheY, the central regulator of bacterial chemotaxis, there is structural homology with RMS deviation of 3.4 Å (for 85 pairs of aligned C
atoms for CheY from Escherichia coli; 3chy
[PDB]
; z = 3.6), as expected from their analogous phosphatase activity (Volz and Matsumura 1991). However, although the CheY structure represents a minimal domain of phosphoaspartase activity, there are structural differences with HAD family. First, CheY does not have a pi-helix motif. Second, as its topology is not the same as the HAD family, its active site is overlapped only if the secondary structure of CheY is permutated as discussed by Wang et al. (2002). Therefore, if they are aligned without permutation, their active sites have approximate twofold rotational relationship.
Characteristics of the cap domain and possible substrates
One of the interesting structural features of TM0651 is the distribution of aromatic residues. Four tyrosines and two phenylalanines are located in the gap between the two domains (Fig. 3C
). Of these, Tyr105, Tyr122, Phe178, and Tyr181 compose a cluster of aromatic rings. Aromatic residues are known to play an important role in binding carbohydrates in some proteins (Vyas 1991). In the maltodextrin/maltose-binding protein, the carbohydrate binding region has four aromatic residues (Tyr341, Trp340, Tyr155, and Trp230) that are involved in stacking interactions (Duan et al. 2001). It is also well known that galactose binding is almost always accompanied by a stacking interaction with an aromatic residue against the B face of the sugar (Pratap et al. 2002).
A Blast and an iterative PSI-Blast search using the TM0651 sequence gave hits with several phosphatases including trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase, sucrose-phosphate phosphatase, and sucrose-6F-phosphate phosphohydrolase. A sequence alignment based on the TM0651 structure with some phosphatases of known function shows that these proteins have full-length sequence homology to TM0651 including the active site residues, except around the H5 helix (Fig. 1
), which is located far from the active site (Fig. 2B
). The combined information of the sequence comparison and the TM0651 structure support a carbohydrate molecule as a possible substrate for TM0651. The gap between the core and cap domains of TM0651 has dimensions of about 8 x 20 x 25 Å3 (Fig. 3C
). As the size of phosphorylated disaccharides is around 5 x 8 x 13 Å3, the gap has plenty of room to accommodate phosphorylated carbohydrate molecules such as trehalose-6-phosphate or sucrose-6F-phosphate.
To identify another possible active site in TM0651, two structural databases containing known structures and functions were queried for similar residue constellations as in TM0651. Two of the active site templates in the PROCAT database (Wallace et al. 1997) of functional groups in enzyme active sites match residues in the TM0651 structure. Glu231 and Glu288 of the Glucan endo-1,3-ß-D-glucosidase template (PDB ID: 1ghs [PDB] ) have an RMS deviation of 1.23 Å with Glu86 and Glu93 of TM0651. Glu160 and Glu375 of the 6-phospho-ß-galactosidase template (1pbg [PDB] ) match with Glu117 and Glu118 of TM0651 with an RMS deviation of 1.52 Å.
A database search for the presence of a known protein motif by RIGOR (Kleywegt 1999) gave 44 motifs that are found in the TM0651 structure. Eleven of them match the clusters of hydrophobic residues in known protein structures. Other motifs located around the active site of TM0651 are related to binding substrates such as N-acetyl-D-glucosamine or inositol-1,4 bisphosphate. Finally, there are sites related to metal ion binding; a magnesium ion with an RMS deviation of 0.94 Å (1bpy [PDB] : Asp190, Asp192, Asp256Asp8, Asp218, Asp214: TM0651), and two calcium ion sites with RMS deviations of 0.96 Å (1bn8 [PDB] : Asp184, Asp223, Asp227Asp8, Asp10, Asp214: TM0651) and 0.50 Å (2por [PDB] : Asp93, Asp95, Asp100, Asp101Asp218, Asp8, Asn215, Asp214: TM0651).
Thus, the metal binding site of TM0651 was well confirmed by comparison with other protein structures from databases. In addition, possible carbohydrate binding motifs were found, although no electron density was detected for those molecules in our structure. However, this is not unexpected, as reaction products would not be expected to be tightly bound. No other prominent active site was detected.
NMR experiment
It has been known that the phosphatase reaction in HAD family members proceeds through the formation of a phosphoaspartate bond (Yan et al. 1999; Cho et al. 2000, 2001; Lahiri et al. 2002). Evidence of an equivalent intermediate for TM0651 is provided by NMR data. In both the response regulators NtrC and CheY, and the HAD member PSP, the addition of beryllofluoride (BeF3-) has been shown to form a mimic of the phosphorylated protein. Crystal structures show BeF3- binds stably in the active site and interacts with the active aspartate in a geometry similar to the phosphoryl group (Yan et al. 1999; Cho et al. 2000, 2001). To test whether BeF3- binds to TM0651, BeF3- was titrated into a 15N -labeled protein sample. A heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) spectrum was collected after each addition (Mori et al. 1995). As BeF3- is added to TM0651, many amide peaks move, appearing at new chemical shifts (Fig. 4
). There is no noticeable broadening of the peaks, indicating a slow off-rate and the formation of a stable BeF3-TM0651 complex. The magnitude and nature of the shifts appear to be intermediate between those seen for PSP, in which the shift of most amide peaks indicated a large domain movement, and receiver domains, in which the shifts were concentrated around the active site residues, and complexation resulted in a subtle structural change (Yan et al. 1999; Cho et al. 2000, 2001).
|
Phosphatase assay
To test the proposed phosphatase activity of TM0651, which was supported by NMR data and structural analysis, a general phosphatase assay was performed using p-nitrophenyl phosphate as a substrate. The Km and kcat values determined were 16 ± 3 mM and 0.1 ± 0.02 sec-1. These values reflect typical activities for nonspecific substrates (Parsons et al. 2002), but verify that TM0651 has phosphatase activity.
In summary, the structure of TM0651 provides the first view of a HAD family member containing a large domain between motifs II and III. Because the topology of the three-layer (
ß)-sandwich cap domain is unique, we cannot identify the substrate for this enzyme by structural homology. However, sequence alignment, features of the structure, NMR data, and a nonspecific phosphatase assay strongly suggest that TM0651 acts as phosphatase with a phosphorylated carbohydrate molecule as a possible substrate. Even though a specific molecular substrate for the protein is not immediately evident, the structure provides a framework to deduce and assay substrates based on clustered conserved residues and general fold characteristics.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cell. A plasmid containing the gene insert was transformed into BL21(DE3)pSJS1244 for protein expression (Kim et al. 1998).
Protein expression, purification, and crystallization
A selenomethionine derivative of the protein was expressed in a methionine auxotroph, E. coli strain B834(DE3)/pSJS1244 (Leahy et al. 1992; Kim et al. 1998), grown in M9 medium supplied with selenomethionine. In the purification process, the cell lysate was subjected to heating (80°C for 30 min) to precipitate most of E. coli proteins. After heating, the supernatant was fractionated using anion exchange chromatography on a HiTrap-Q column (Amersham Biosciences Corp.). The protein eluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, and 100 mM NaCl. SDS-PAGE showed one band around 30 kD, corresponding to the molecular weight of TM0651. Dynamic light scattering confirmed this, showing a monodisperse peak of the monomer size. The initial crystallization conditions were screened by the sparse matrix method using the Hampton Research Kits (Jancarik and Kim 1991) at room temperature. In the optimized crystallization conditions, 1 µL of the protein (108 mg/mL) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 220 mM NaCl, was mixed with 1 µL of 5 mM DTT, 1.0 M ammonium sulfate, and 0.1 M citric acid at pH 5.5. The hanging drop was equilibrated with 0.5 mL of 1.0 M ammonium sulfate, and 0.1 M citric acid at pH 5.5. Thick pyramidal shaped crystals grew in a month to approximate dimensions of 0.1 x 0.1 x 0.05 mm3.
Data collection and reduction
The selenomethionine incorporated crystals were soaked in a drop of mother liquor with 20% glycerol (about 10 µL) for about 1 min before being flashed-cooled in liquid nitrogen and used for X-ray data collection. X-ray diffraction data to 3.0 Å were collected at a single wavelength (0.97938 Å; Table 1B
) at the Macromolecular Crystallography Facility beamline 5.0.2 at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory using an Area Detector System Co. Quantum 4 CCD detector placed 140 mm from the sample. The oscillation range per image was 1.0° with no overlap between two contiguous images. X-ray diffraction data were processed and scaled using DENZO and SCALEPACK from the HKL program suite (Otwinowski and Minor 1997). The native X-ray diffraction data set was collected to 2.2 Å. Data statistics are summarized in Table 1B
.
|
The preliminary model was then refined against a native data set collected later using the program CNS (Brunger et al. 1998). The reflections in this data set between 20.0 Å and 2.2 Å were included throughout the refinement calculations. Ten percent of the data were randomly chosen for free R-factor crossvalidation. The refinement statistics are shown in Table 1A
. Isotropic B-factors for individual atoms were initially fixed to 20 Å2, and were refined in the last stages. The 2Fo - Fc and Fo - Fc maps were used for the manual rebuilding between refinement cycles and for the location of solvent molecules. When the refined B-factor of a solvent molecule exceeded 70 Å2, it was removed. Atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with the access code of 1NF2.
NMR sample preparation
Uniformly labeled 15N TM0651 was extracted from cells grown in M9 minimal media with 15N ammonium chloride as the sole nitrogen source. The labeled protein was purified according to the unlabeled protocol. Purified protein was concentrated to
0.5 mM in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.22, 50 mM NaCl, 8 mM DTT, 10 µM PMSF, 0.02% NaN3, and 12 mM MgCl2. A concentrated stock solution of BeF3- was made by adding a seven molar excess of NaF to BeCl2. This stock solution was used for the titration. 1H-15N HSQC spectra were recorded at 315 K on a DRX 600 spectrometer (Bruker Instruments).
Phosphatase assay
para-Nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in a solution of 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 5 mM DTT, and 20 mM MgCl2. Serial dilutions of this stock solution were either incubated with TM0651 (total concentration 300 nM as determined by UV absorbance at 280 nm) or with an equivalent volume of buffer as a control. All reactions were carried out at 70°C, according to the thermophilic origin of the protein. Aliquots of the reaction solutions were taken at different timepoints and diluted into 100 mM NaOH to stop the reaction. Progress of the reaction was monitored at 410 nm, and the amount of p-nitrophenol released was calculated by taking the difference in absorbance between the controls and corresponding protein-containing reaction solutions using a molar absorptivity coefficient of 18,400 M-1cm-1 (Parsons et al. 2002). Kinetic constants were determined from the initial rates of hydrolysis calculated at substrate concentrations of 50, 40, 30, 20, 15, 10, 7.5, and 5 mM.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blattner, F.R., Plunkett III, G., Bloch, C.A., Perna, N.T., Burland, V., Riley, M., Collado-Vides, J., Glasner, J.D., Rode, C.K., Mayhew, G.F., et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277: 14531474.
Brunger, A.T., Adams, P.D., Clore, G.M., DeLano, W.L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Jiang, J.S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N.S., et al. 1998. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54: 905921.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carson, M. 1991. RIBBONS 2.0. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 958961.[CrossRef]
Cho, H.S., Lee, S.-Y., Yan, D., Pan, X., Parkinson, J.S., Kustu, S., Wemmer, D.E., and Pelton, J.G. 2000. NMR structure of activated CheY. J. Mol. Biol. 297: 543551.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cho, H.S., Wang, W., Kim, R., Yokota, H., Damo, S., Kim, S.-H., Wemmer, D.E., Kustu, S., and Yan, D. 2001. BeF(3)(-) acts as a phosphate analog in proteins phosphorylated on aspartate: Structure of a BeF(3)(-) complex with phosphoserine phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 85258530.
CCP4 (Collaborative Computational Project Number 4). 1994. The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 50: 760763.[CrossRef][Medline]
Collet, J.F., Stroobant, V., Pirard, M., Delpierre, G., and Van Schaftingen, E. 1998. A new class of phosphotransferases phosphorylated on an aspartate residue in an amino-terminal DXDX(T/V) motif. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 1410714112.
Duan, X., Hall, J.A., Nikaido, H., and Quiocho, F.A. 2001. Crystal structures of the maltodextrin/maltose-binding protein complexed with reduced oligosaccharides: Flexibility of tertiary structure and ligand binding. J. Mol. Biol. 306: 11151126.[CrossRef][Medline]
Frishman, D. and Argos, P. 1995. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 23: 566579.[CrossRef][Medline]
Galburt, E.A., Pelletier, J., Wilson, G., and Stoddard, B.L. 2002. Structure of a tRNA Repair enzyme and molecular biology workhorse: T4 polynucleotide kinase. Structure 10: 12491260.[Medline]
Giaever, H.M., Styrvold, O.B., Kaasen, I., and Strom, A.R. 1988. Biochemical and genetic characterization of osmoregulatory trehalose synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 170: 28412849.
Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1997. Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 231234.
Hutchison, C.A., Peterson, S.N., Gill, S.R., Cline, R.T., White, O., Fraser, C.M., Smith, H.O., and Venter, J.C. 1999. Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal Mycoplasma genome. Science 286: 21652169.
Jancarik, J. and Kim, S.-H. 1991. Sparse matrix sampling: A screening method for crystallization of proteins. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 409411.[CrossRef]
Jones, T.A., Zou, J.Y., Cowan, S.W., and Kjeldgaard, M. 1991. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A 47: 110119.
Kim, R., Sandler, S.J., Goldman, S., Yokota, H., Clark, A.J., and Kim, S.-H. 1998. Overexpression of archaeal proteins in Escherichia coli. Biotech. Lett. 20: 207210.
Kleywegt, G.J. 1999. Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 18871897.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kleywegt, G.J. and Jones, T.A. 1999. Software for handling macromolecular envelopes. Acta Crystallogr. D 55: 941944.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kraulis, P.J. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946950.[CrossRef]
Lahiri, S.D., Zhang, G., Dunaway-Mariano, D., and Allen, K.N. 2002. Caught in the act: The structure of phosphorylated ß-phosphoglucomutase from Lactococcus lactis. Biochemistry 41: 83518359.[CrossRef][Medline]
Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S., and Thornton, J.M. 1993. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26: 283291.[CrossRef]
Leahy, D.J., Hendrickson, W.A., Aukhil, I., and Erickson, H.P. 1992. Structure of a fibronectin type III domain from tenascin phased by MAD analysis of the selenomethionyl protein. Science 258: 987991.
Lunn, J.E, Ashton, A.R., Hatch, M.D., and Heldt, H.W. 2000. Purification, molecular cloning, and sequence analysis of sucrose-6F-phosphate phosphohydrolase from plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 1291412919.
Luzzati, V. 1952. Traitement statistique des erreurs dans la determinationn des structures cristallines. Acta Crystallogr. 5: 802810.[CrossRef]
Morais, M.C., Zhang, W., Baker, A.S., Zhang, G., Dunaway-Mariano, D., and Allen, K.N. 2000. The crystal structure of Bacillus cereus phosphonoacetaldehyde hydrolase: Insight into catalysis of phosphorus bond cleavage and catalytic diversification within the HAD enzyme superfamily. Biochemistry 39: 1038510396.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mori, S., Abeygunawardana, C., Johnson, M.O., and Vanzijl, P.C.M. 1995. Improved sensitivity of HSQC spectra of exchanging protons at short interscan delays using a new fast HSQC (FHSQC) detection scheme that avoids water saturation. J. Magn. Reson. B 108: 9498.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nelson, K.E., Clayton, R.A., Gill, S.R., Gwinn, M.L., Dodson, R.J., Haft, D.H., Hickey, E.K., Peterson, J.D., Nelson, W.C., Ketchum, K.A., et al. 1999. Evidence for lateral gene transfer between Archaea and Bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima. Nature 399: 323329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nicholls, A., Sharp, K.A., and Honig, B. 1991. Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 11: 281296.[CrossRef][Medline]
Orengo, C.A., Michie, A.D., Jones, S., Jones, D.T., Swindells, M.B., and Thornton, J.M. 1997. CATHA hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Struct. Fold Des. 5: 10931108.
Otwinowski, Z. and Minor, W. 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276: 307326.
Parsons, J.F., Lim, K., Tempczyk, A., Krajewski, W., Eisenstein, E., and Herzberg, O. 2002. From structure to function: YrbI from Haemophilus influenzae (HI1679) is a phosphatase. Proteins 46: 393404.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pratap, J.V., Jeyaprakash, A.A., Rani, P.G., Sekar, K., Surolia, A., and Vijayan, M. 2002. Crystal structures of Artocarpin, a moraceae lectin with mannose specificity, and its complex with methyl-
-d-mannose: Implications to the generation of carbohydrate specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 317: 237247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ridder, I.S., Rozeboom, H.J., Kalk, K.H., and Dijkstra, B.W. 1999. Crystal structures of intermediates in the dehalogenation of haloalkanoates by L-2-haloacid dehalogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 3067230678.
Rinaldo-Matthis, A., Rampazzo, C., Reichard, P., Bianchi, V., and Nordlund, P. 2002. Crystal structure of a human mitochondrial deoxyribonucleotidase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9: 779787.[CrossRef][Medline]
Selengut, J.D. and Levine, R.L. 2000. MDP-1: A novel eukaryotic magnesium dependent phosphatase. Biochemistry 39: 83158324.[CrossRef][Medline]
Terwilliger, T.C. and Berendzen, J. 1999. Automated MAD and MIR structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 55: 849861.[CrossRef][Medline]
Toyoshima, C., Nakasako, M., Nomura, H., and Ogawa, H. 2000. Crystal structure of the calcium pump of sarcoplasmic reticulum at 2.6 Å resolution. Nature 405: 647655.[CrossRef][Medline]
Volz, K. and Matsumura, P. 1991. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli CheY refined at 1.7 Å resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 1551115519.
Vyas, N.K. 1991. Atomic features of proteincarbohydrate interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1: 732740.[CrossRef]
Wallace, A.C., Borkakoti, N., and Thornton, J.M. 1997. TESS: A geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci. 6: 23082323.[Abstract]
Wang, W., Kim, R., Jancarik, J., Yokota, H., and Kim, S.-H. 2001. Crystal structure of phosphoserine phosphatase from Methanococcus jannaschii, a hyperthermophile, at 1.8 Å resolution. Structure 9: 6571.[Medline]
Wang, W., Cho, H.S., Kim, R., Jancarik, J., Yokota, H., Nguyen, H.H., Grigoriev, I.V., Wemmer, D.E., and Kim, S.-H. 2002. Structural characterization of the reaction pathway in phosphoserine phosphatase: Crystallographic "snapshots" of intermediate states. J. Mol. Biol. 319: 421431.[CrossRef][Medline]
Weaver, T.M. 2000. The pi-helix translates structure into function. Protein Sci. 9: 201206.[Abstract]
Welch, M., Chinardet, N., Mourey, L., Birck, C., and Samama, J.P. 1998. Structure of the CheY-binding domain of histidine kinase CheA in complex with CheY. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5: 2529.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yan, D., Cho, H.S., Hastings, C.A., Igo, M.M., Lee, S.-Y., Pelton, J.G., Stewart, V., Wemmer, D.E., and Kustu, S. 1999. Beryllofluoride mimics phosphorylation of NtrC and other bacterial response regulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 1478914794.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. F. Gherardini and M. Helmer-Citterich Structure-based function prediction: approaches and applications Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, July 3, 2008; (2008) eln030v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Rangarajan, A. Proteau, J. Wagner, M.-N. Hung, A. Matte, and M. Cygler Structural Snapshots of Escherichia coli Histidinol Phosphate Phosphatase along the Reaction Pathway J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37930 - 37941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. N. Rao, D. Kumaran, J. Seetharaman, J. B. Bonanno, S. K. Burley, and S. Swaminathan Crystal structure of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase-related protein: Biochemical and biological implications. Protein Sci., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1735 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fieulaine, J. E. Lunn, F. Borel, and J.-L. Ferrer The Structure of a Cyanobacterial Sucrose-Phosphatase Reveals the Sugar Tongs That Release Free Sucrose in the Cell PLANT CELL, July 1, 2005; 17(7): 2049 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Shin, Y. Lou, J. Jancarik, H. Yokota, R. Kim, and S.-H. Kim Crystal structure of YjeQ from Thermotoga maritima contains a circularly permuted GTPase domain PNAS, September 7, 2004; 101(36): 13198 - 13203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Shi and G. C. Ferreira Probing the Active Site Loop Motif of Murine Ferrochelatase by Random Mutagenesis J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 19977 - 19986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME |