|
|
||||||||
1 RIKEN Genomic Sciences Center, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan
2 RIKEN Harima Institute at SPring-8, Mikazuki-cho, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
3 Protein Design Laboratory, Yokohama City University, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan
4 Structure and Function of Biomolecules, PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
5 Global Scientific Information and Computing Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
6 Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
7 Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
8 Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
9 Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory, Yokohama City University, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan
Reprint requests to: Shigeyuki Yokoyama, RIKEN Genomic Sciences Center, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan; e-mail: yokoyama{at}biochem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp; fax: 81-45-503-9195.
(RECEIVED April 9, 2003; FINAL REVISION May 15, 2003; ACCEPTED May 15, 2003)
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/gad.03104003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helices. The N-terminal five ß-strands and four
-helices form an incomplete Rossmann fold-like structure. The structure shares some similarity to the sugar-processing enzymes with Rossmann fold-like domains, especially those of the GPGTF (glycogen phosphorylase/glycosyl transferase) superfamily, and also to the NAD(P)-binding Rossmann fold domains. TT1542 is a homohexamer in the crystal and in solution, the six monomers forming a cylindrical structure. Putative active sites are suggested by the structure and conserved amino acid residues. Keywords: Thermus thermophilus HB8; conserved protein TT1542; GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylase homolog; GlcNAc-Ins de-N-acetylase homolog; mycothiol S-conjugate amidase homolog; DUF158; crystallography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-D-glucopyranoside (GlcNAc-Ins) de-N-acetylase, respectively (Newton et al. 2000a,b). They are involved in the mycothiol-dependent detoxification pathway found in most actinomycetes, but not in other microbes and eukaryotes (Newton et al. 1996; Fahey 2001; Newton and Fahey 2002), so TT1542 is also unlikely to function as a mycothiol S-conjugate amidase or a GlcNAc-Ins de-N-acetylase. All of the functionally annotated TT1542 homologs are hydrolases targeting the C2-amide bond of glucosamine in various disaccharides. TT1542 and most of its prokaryotic homologs are annotated as hypothetical proteins. In the Pfam database (Bateman et al. 2002), TT1542 and its homologs in many prokaryotes and fission yeast belong to the PF02585 or DUF158 family, which is equivalent to COG2120 in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database of Clusters of Orthologous Groups (Tatusov et al. 2001). In the present study, we solved the crystal structure of the conserved hypothetical protein, TT1542, and determined its molecular weight in solution by analytical ultracentrifugation. This is the first reported structure of a member of this protein superfamily, and here we discuss its structural characteristics.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
-helices (Fig. 3A
-helices (
1
4) is similar to the incomplete Rossmann fold (Rossmann et al. 1975). The typical Rossmann fold consists of six parallel ß-strands in the order ß3-ß2-ß1-ß4-ß5-ß6, but variants lacking ß6 are common. The remaining C-terminal region of TT1542 forms an additional structure that consists of two ß-strands (ß6 and ß7) and two
-helices (
5 and
6), in the order ß6-
5-
6-ß7, followed by a hook-like tail, and is attached to the incomplete Rossmann fold structure (Fig. 3A,B
-helices (Baker et al. 1992). TT1542 also has a hydrophilic cavity at this site (Fig. 3A
|
residues; Fig. 3C
residues; Ha et al. 2000). However, their amino acid sequences share only weak similarity with that of TT1542 (identities of 9% and 13%, respectively). These proteins belong to a large superfamily, termed GPGTF, of diverse sugar processing enzymes (Wrabl and Grishin 2001). They have two Rossmann fold-like domains in the monomer proteins (Fig. 3C
residues, 9% identity; Fig. 3D
residues, 11% identity; Thoden et al. 1996). They belong to a superfamily of NAD(P)-binding Rossmann fold domains (Baker et al. 1992). All of these Rossmann folds of the GPGTF and NAD(P)-binding superfamilies are the typical Rossmann fold with six parallel ß-strands sandwiched by five
-helices. In contrast, the Rossmann fold-like region of TT1542 lacks the sixth ß-strand and the fifth
-helix, while the rest of the region shows high similarity to the typical Rossmann folds (Fig. 3A,C,D
5-
6-ß7-tail structure of TT1542 is completely different from the structures following the typical Rossmann folds (Fig. 3A,C,D
-
-ß. The topology of TT1542 is therefore unique. The C-terminal region is involved in the monomermonomer interactions in the hexamer (see below).
Quaternary structure
The two monomers (A and B) in an asymmetric unit are related by a noncrystallographic twofold axis perpendicular to the crystallographic threefold axis (Fig. 4A,C
). The tails intertwine with each other, and the tail of one monomer contacts the ß6 and ß7 strands, and the
6 helix of the other monomer in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 4C
). These dimer contacts are mainly hydrophobic and bury 1460 Å2 (13.1% of the surface area) per monomer.
|
6 helices and the ß5-ß6 loops. The A-A', A'-A'', A''-A, B-B', B'-B'', and B''-B interactions are formed by the packing of the
3 helix, the
4 helix, the 310 helix, the
4-ß5 loop, and the C-terminal tail in one monomer and the ß2-
2 loop, the ß3-
3 loop, the ß4-
4 loop, the ß5 strand, and the ß5-ß6 loop in the other monomer. Most of these contacts are hydrophobic. The hexamer forms a cylinder, and the hydrophilic cavity mentioned above is found at the side of this structure (Fig. 5A,B
|
|
1 loop and the start of the
1 helix (Fig. 1
1 turn, and the side chains of His 10, Asp 12, and Asp 13 point into the hydrophilic cavity (Figs. 2
4-ß5 loop in the adjacent monomer participates in forming this cavity (Figs. 4B
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The highest scoring structural homologs, UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase and the GlcNAc transferase MurG, belong to the GPGTF superfamily of enzymes (Campbell et al. 2000; Ha et al. 2000; Wrabl and Grishin 2001), which have two Rossmann fold-like structures in each monomer. The structure of TT1542 is similar to the N-terminal domain in these proteins, but less so to the C-terminal domain. The structure of UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase complexed with UDP shows that the C-terminal domain contains the UDP binding site, and the N-terminal domain is expected to bind the GlcNAc portion of its ligand, UDP-GlcNAc (Campbell et al. 2000). The next highest scoring TT1542 homologs, the RCK domain of the K+ channel and UDP-galactose 4-epimerase, belong to a superfamily of NAD(P)-binding Rossmann fold domains, which have one Rossmann fold structure in each monomer (Thoden et al. 1996; Jiang et al. 2001). These two proteins are known to be homodimers, and in UDP-galactose 4-epimerase, each monomer binds one NAD+ or NADH (Thoden et al. 1996). TT1542 also has two Rossmann fold-like structures in the dimeric form, but the domain orientations are different from those of these homologs.
Between the end of the ß1 strand and the beginning of the
1 helix, the highly conserved sequence P9-H10-P11-D12-D13 forms a turn in TT1542 (Figs. 1
, 2
, 3A
). Computational analysis suggests that His 10, Asp 12, and Asp 13 in this sequence, and Glu 15 may be catalytic residues (Table 2
). Highly conserved residues are also clustered within this region in UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase, the GlcNAc transferase MurG, and the NAD(P)-binding Rossmann fold domains (Baker et al. 1992; Campbell et al. 2000; Ha et al. 2000). In the case of the NAD(P)-binding Rossmann fold domains, a conserved glycine-rich (G-rich) motif (consensus sequence G-X-G-X-X-G/A) forms a tight turn, which hydrogen bonds to the adenine ribose ring, either directly or indirectly (Baker et al. 1992). In addition, in many classical Rossmann domains, an acidic residue at the C-terminal end of the ß2 strand is commonly used to hydrogen bond to the adenine ribose (Baker et al. 1992). TT1542 has a threonine (Thr 38) at this position, and serine or threonine are found in the TT1542 sequence homologs (Fig. 1
). Thr 38 is separated from the putative active site by Asp 74 however (Fig. 7A
), and computational analysis (Ota et al. 2003) predicts Asp74 (but not Thr 38) to be catalytic. Arg 51 and Glu 54 in the
2 helix are also highly conserved, and these side chains are close enough to hydrogen bond with each other. Both Arg 51 and Glu 54 are predicted to be catalytically important residues (Ota et al. 2003). All of these predicted catalytic residues in TT1542 are located in the putative active site, and their polar side chains face this cavity. Further studies are necessary to identify the substrate and the enzyme activity of TT1542.
The eukaryotic sequence homologs of TT1542, PIG-L, and GPI12, are GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylases that catalyze the second step of GPI biosynthesis (Stevens 1995; Nakamura et al. 1997; Watanabe et al. 1999; Kinoshita and Inoue 2000; Chang et al. 2002). Many GPI-anchored proteins have important biological activities, and they include membrane-binding enzymes, receptors, and antigens (Ikezawa 2002). Furthermore, the GPI-bound proteins of parasitic protozoa are believed to be the dominant parasite toxins (Delorenzi et al. 2002). The GPI12 protein from the African sleeping sickness parasite Trypanosoma brucei is essential to this pathogenic organism, and is considered to be a potential drug target (Chang et al. 2002). GPI-bound proteins may play an important role in other parasitic diseases, such as malaria, the leishmaniases, and Chagas disease. The two TT1542 homologs from M. tuberculosis involved in mycothiol metabolism are also potential drug targets. Most actinomycetes have a mycothiol-dependent detoxification pathway (Newton and Fahey 2002), and mycothiol-deficient mutants in Mycobacterium smegmatis are sensitive to many antibiotics (Newton et al. 1999; Rawat et al. 2002).
The TT1542 structure presented here is the first three-dimensional structure of this superfamily of proteins. This structure will help to model other members of this superfamily, several of which are important drug targets.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Selenomethionine (SeMet)-substituted protein was expressed in the E. coli methionine auxotroph strain B834(DE3). Cells were grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with SeMet, and protein expression was induced by isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). The cells were disrupted by sonication and then were incubated at 70°C for 30 min. The cell lysate was loaded on a Q Sepharose Fast Flow (Amersham Biosciences) column (50 mL) previously equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 2 mM DTT. The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 01.0 M NaCl in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 2 mM DTT. Next, the protein sample was loaded on a Resource ISO (Amersham Biosciences) column (1 mL) previously equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1.2 M (NH4)2SO4 and 2 mM DTT. The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 1.20 M (NH4)2SO4 in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) with 2 mM DTT. Finally the protein sample was loaded on a Superdex 75 HR column (Amersham Biosciences) previously equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 300 mM NaCl and 2 mM DTT, and eluted with this buffer. The yield of purified TT1542 was 0.068 mg per 1 g wet cells.
The crystals were grown at 20°C by the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method (protein at 3.0 mg mL-1) against a reservoir solution containing 1.6 M (NH4)2SO4, 100 mM HEPES HCl at pH 7.1, and 100 mM NaCl. Crystals with a size of 0.2 x 0.2 x 0.1 mm grew within a week.
Data collection and processing
Data were collected at RIKEN beamline BL44B2 of SPring-8, Harima, Japan (Adachi et al. 2001) at three wavelengths (Table 1
). All data were processed using the HKL2000 and SCALEPACK programs (Otwinowski and Minor 1997). General handling of the scaled data was carried out with programs from the CCP4 suite (CCP4 1994). The positions of the Se atoms and the initial multiwavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) phases were determined using the program SOLVE (Terwilliger and Berendzen 1999), and the MAD phases were improved with RESOLVE (Terwilliger 2001). The resulting electron density map was extremely clear.
Model building and structural refinement
The data collected at the remote wavelength (0.9752 Å) were used to refine the model. Phase extension to 2.0 Å and automated model building were performed with ARP/wARP (Perrakis et al. 2001). The remaining residues were built with the program TURBO-FRODO. A starting model was refined using X-PLOR v3.851 (Brunger 1996) with bulk solvent correction. Conventional positional refinement and individual B-factor refinement were alternated with manual fitting to the electron density using TURBO-FRODO. REFMAC (Murshudov et al. 1999) was used for the final refinement stage. The final model has very good geometry, as examined by PROCHECK (Laskowski et al. 1992): 95.5% of the residues have
/
angles in the "most favored region" of the Ramachandran plot and 100% are in the "allowed regions."
The electron density for the model is very good, as shown in Figure 2
. Exceptions include the residues between Thr 178 and Val 186; the side chains of Lys 45, Arg 174, Thr 178, Val 186, and Lys 189 in monomer A; Glu 50, Arg 51, Arg 52, Arg 107, Arg 128, Glu 133, Val 186, and Lys 189 in monomer B. The data collection and refinement statistics are listed in Table 1
.
Atomic coordinates have been deposited into the Protein Data Bank with PDB code 1UAN.
Analytical ultracentrifugation
All analytical ultracentrifuge experiments were carried out with a Beckman Optima XL-I analytical ultracentrifuge. The sample buffer was 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM sodium chloride, and 5 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, and all experiments were performed out at 20°C. The solvent density and protein partial specific volume (|gu) were estimated with SEDNTERP (Laue et al. 1992). Sedimentation velocity data were obtained at 40,000 rpm using an Epon two channel centrepiece, with a loading concentration of 0.27 mg mL-1. The data were analyzed with the program SEDFIT (Schuck 1998), and the polydispersity of the solution was checked by the van Holde-Weischet method. The molecular weight was estimated by fitting the data to the Svedberg equation. The error in the calculated molecular weight was estimated by the Monte Carlo routine in SEDFIT. Sedimentation equilibrium experiments were carried out with six-channel centerpieces with loading concentrations of 0.9, 0.4, and 0.2 mg mL-1. Data were obtained at 6, 8, and 10 krpm. A total equilibration time of 14 h was used for each speed, with a scan taken at 12 h to ensure equilibrium had been reached. The absorbance wavelength was 280 nm, and the optical baseline was determined by overspeeding at 35 krpm at the end of data collection. For the interference data, an initial scan taken at 3000 rpm was collected after 10 min, and subtracted from the data collected at equilibrium. The equilibrium data were fitted using the manufacturers software.
Prediction of catalytic residues
In this method (Ota et al. 2003), the conserved sites identified by multiple sequence alignments were classified into functionally important sites and others, based on the assumption that the amino acid residues in functionally important sites could contribute toward destabilizing the protein. In this study, a multiple alignment was constructed using CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al. 1994) for a set of sequences detected by a Blast search against the Swiss-Prot database with E-values >10-5. The advantages of this method are that a sophisticated 3D profile (Ota et al. 2001) is used to evaluate the fitness of the amino acid residues in each site, and that it combines other structural features specifically found in the active sites of known proteins; that is, the catalytic residues tend to exist on a partially buried site, to be involved in the ß or coil structures, and to reside in holes or clefts in the protein structure.
Ligand search and docking model production
To find binding sites in the PDB similar to that of the hypothetical protein TT1542, we used the search method originally developed by Kinoshita et al. (2002) with some modifications. The details of the modifications will be described elsewhere (Kinoshita and Nakamura 2003). The main improvement is a change in the descriptors of the surface geometry. A molecular surface was generated by Connollys algorithm (Connolly 1983), and the electrostatic potential at the surface was calculated by solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation numerically for the precise continuum model with the self-consistent boundary algorithm, to eliminate the effect of the boundary in the finite-difference method with the 1.0 Å grid size (Nakamura and Nishida 1989). Dielectric constants of 2 and 80 were used for the protein and the solvent region, respectively, and an ionic strength of 0.1 M was assumed for every case. The molecular surface was represented by a set of triangular meshes with a normal vector at each vertex on the surface, and the similarity of the surface geometry was assessed by the similarity of the spatial arrangement of the normal vectors. Then the corresponding vertices with similar spatial arrangements and similar electrostatic potentials were searched (Kinoshita et al. 2002). Curvatures at the surface points are now used to describe the surface geometry. This change significantly enhances the performance of the method to find subtle similarities. The similarity search was carried out with all 22,747 binding sites found in the PDB, excluding the low resolution (>2.5 Å) models, NMR entries, and metal binding sites. The query was the entire surface of TT1542, and the database contained the number of subsurfaces around the binding sites. Vertices in each subsurface were selected within 5 Å of the nearest atom in the ligand. The similarity to each binding site was measured by the number of corresponding vertices, and then it was converted to two indices, the Z-score and the coverage. The Z-score is calculated by (n - mean)/SD, where n is the number of corresponding vertices, and mean and SD are the mean value and standard deviation of the numbers of corresponding vertices obtained by the similarity search against the database, respectively. The coverage is the number of corresponding vertices divided by the number of vertices in each binding site. The Z-score can evaluate the significance of the number of vertices within the database, but it tends to become large when the binding site is large, because large binding sites contain the large numbers of vertices. On the other hand, the coverage will be small for a large ligand. Similarity is more significant with higher scores. The best match found for TT1542 was MMP inhibitor 4a in PDB entry 1d5j
[PDB]
; 308 vertices (Z-score = 3.8, coverage = 0.51) were found to correspond to the vertices in the putative active site of TT1542. The putative complexes were generated by superposing the ligand onto TT1542 by matching corresponding vertices. Figure 7B
shows the MMP inhibitor 4a docked in the putative active site of TT1542. The RMSD of the superimposition was 0.7 Å.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 33873402.
Baker, P.J., Britton, K.L., Rice, D.W., Rob, A., and Stillman, T.J. 1992. Structural consequences of sequence patterns in the fingerprint region of the nucleotide binding fold. Implications for nucleotide specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 228: 662671.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bateman, A., Birney, E., Cerruti, L., Durbin, R., Etwiller, L., Eddy, S.R., Griffiths-Jones, S., Howe, K.L., Marshall, M., and Sonnhammer, E.L. 2002. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 276280.
Brunger, A.T. 1996. X-PLOR, Version 3.85.Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Campbell, R.E., Mosimann, S.C., Tanner, M.E., and Strynadka, N.C. 2000. The structure of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase reveals homology to phosphoglycosyl transferases. Biochemistry 39: 1499315001.[CrossRef][Medline]
CCP4 (Collaborative Computational Project Number 4). 1994. The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography. Acta. Crystallogr. D 50: 760763.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chang, T., Milne, K.G., Guther, M.L., Smith, T.K., and Ferguson, M.A. 2002. Cloning of Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania major genes encoding the GlcNAc-phosphatidylinositol de-N-acetylase of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis that is essential to the African sleeping sickness parasite. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 5017650182.
Connolly, M.L. 1983. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 221: 709713.
Delorenzi, M., Sexton, A., Shams-Eldin, H., Schwarz, R.T., Speed, T., and Schofield, L. 2002. Genes for glycosylphosphatidylinositol toxin biosynthesis in Plasmodium falciparum. Infect. Immun. 70: 45104522.
Eisenhaber, B., Bork, P., and Eisenhaber, F. 2001. Post-translational GPI lipid anchor modification of proteins in kingdoms of life: Analysis of protein sequence data from complete genomes. Protein Eng. 14: 1725.
Fahey, R.C. 2001. Novel thiols of prokaryotes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55: 333356.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ha, S., Walker, D., Shi, Y., and Walker, S. 2000. The 1.9 Å crystal structure of Escherichia coli MurG, a membrane-associated glycosyltransferase involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Protein Sci. 9: 10451052.[Abstract]
Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1997. Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 231234.
Ikezawa, H. 2002. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 25: 409417.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jiang, Y., Pico, A., Cadene, M., Chait, B.T., and MacKinnon, R. 2001. Structure of the RCK domain from the E. coli K+ channel and demonstration of its presence in the human BK channel. Neuron 29: 593601.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kinoshita, K., Furui, J., and Nakamura, H. 2002. Identification of protein functions from a molecular surface database, eF-site. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2: 922.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kinoshita, K. and Nakamura, H. 2003. Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database, eF-site. Protein Sci. (this issue)
Kinoshita, T. and Inoue, N. 2000. Dissecting and manipulating the pathway for glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4: 632638.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kraulis, P.J. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946950.[CrossRef]
Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26: 283291.
Laue, T.M., Shah, B., Ridgeway, T.M., and Pelletier, S.L. 1992. SEDNTERP. In Analytical ultracentrifugation in biochemistry and polymer science (eds. S.E. Harding et al.), pp. 90125. Royal Society of Chemistry, UK.
Merritt, E.A. and Bacon, D.J. 1997. Raster3D: Photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol. 277: 505524.[Medline]
Murshudov, G.N., Lebedev, A., Vagin, A.A., Wilson, K.S., and Dodson, E.J. 1999. Efficient anisotropic refinement of macromolecular structures using FFT. Acta Crystallogr. D 55: 247255.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakamura, H. and Nishida, S. 1989. Numerical calculations of electrostatic potentials of proteinsolvent systems by the self consistent boundary method. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56: 16091622.
Nakamura, N., Inoue, N., Watanabe, R., Takahashi, M., Takeda, J., Stevens, V.L., and Kinoshita, T. 1997. Expression cloning of PIG-L, a candidate N-acetylglucosaminyl-phosphatidylinositol deacetylase. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 1583415840.
Newton, G.L. and Fahey, R.C. 2002. Mycothiol biochemistry. Arch. Microbiol. 178: 388394.[CrossRef][Medline]
Newton, G.L., Arnold, K., Price, M.S., Sherrill, C., Delcardayre, S.B., Aharonowitz, Y., Cohen, G., Davies, J., Fahey, R.C., and Davis, C. 1996. Distribution of thiols in microorganisms: Mycothiol is a major thiol in most actinomycetes. J. Bacteriol. 178: 19901995.
Newton, G.L., Unson, M.D., Anderberg, S.J., Aguilera, J.A., Oh, N.N., delCardayre, S.B., Av-Gay, Y., and Fahey, R.C. 1999. Characterization of Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants defective in 1-D-myo-Inosityl-2-amino-2-deoxy-
-D-glucopyranoside and mycothiol biosynthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 255: 239244.[CrossRef][Medline]
Newton, G.L., Av-Gay, Y., and Fahey, R.C. 2000a. N-Acetyl-1-D-myo-inosityl-2-amino-2-deoxy-
-D-glucopyranoside deacetylase (MshB) is a key enzyme in mycothiol biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 182: 69586963.
. 2000b. A novel mycothiol-dependent detoxification pathway in mycobacteria involving mycothiol S-conjugate amidase. Biochemistry 39: 1073910746.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ota, M., Isogai, Y., and Nishikawa, K. 2001. Knowledge-based potential defined for a rotamer library to design protein sequences. Protein Eng. 14: 557564.
Ota, M., Kinoshita, K., and Nishikawa, K. 2003. Prediction of catalytic residues in enzymes based on known tertiary structure, stability profile, and sequence conservation. J. Mol. Biol. 327: 10531064.[CrossRef][Medline]
Otwinowski, Z. and Minor, W. 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276: 307326.
Perrakis, A., Harkiolaki, M., Wilson, K.S., and Lamzin, V.S. 2001. ARP/wARP and molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 57: 14451450.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rawat, M., Newton, G.L., Ko, M., Martinez, G.J., Fahey, R.C., and Av-Gay, Y. 2002. Mycothiol-deficient Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants are hypersensitive to alkylating agents, free radicals, and antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 33483355.
Rossmann, M.G., Liljas, A., Branden, C.-I., and Banaszak, L.J. 1975. In The enzymes (ed. P.D. Boyer), pp. 61102. Academic Press, New York.
Schuck, P. 1998. Sedimentation analysis of non-interacting and self-associating solutes using numerical solutions to the Lamm equation. Biophys. J. 75: 15031512.
Stevens, V.L. 1995. Biosynthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchors. Biochem. J. 310: 361370.
Tatusov, R.L., Natale, D.A., Garkavtsev, I.V., Tatusova, T.A., Shankavaram, U.T., Rao, B.S., Kiryutin, B., Galperin, M.Y., Fedorova, N.D., and Koonin, E.V. 2001. The COG database: New developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 2228.
Taylor, W. 1986. The classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theor. Biol. 119: 205218.[CrossRef][Medline]
Terwilliger, T.C. 2001. Map-likelihood phasing. Acta Crystallogr. D 57: 17631775.[CrossRef][Medline]
Terwilliger, T.C. and Berendzen, J. 1999. Automated MAD and MIR structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 55: 849861.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thoden, J.B., Frey, P.A., and Holden, H.M. 1996. Molecular structure of the NADH/UDP-glucose abortive complex of UDP-galactose 4-epimerase from Escherichia coli: Implications for the catalytic mechanism. Biochemistry 35: 51375144.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 46734680.
Watanabe, R., Ohishi, K., Maeda, Y., Nakamura, N., and Kinoshita, T. 1999. Mammalian PIG-L and its yeast homolog Gpi12p are N-acetylglucosaminylphosphatidylinositol de-N-acetylases essential in glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 339: 185192.
Wrabl, J.O. and Grishin, N.V. 2001. Homology between O-linked GlcNAc transferases and proteins of the glycogen phosphorylase superfamily. J. Mol. Biol. 314: 365374.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zvelebil, M.J., Barton, G.J., Taylor, W.R., and Sternberg, M.J. 1987. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 195: 957961.[CrossRef][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kinoshita, Y. Murakami, and H. Nakamura eF-seek: prediction of the functional sites of proteins by searching for similar electrostatic potential and molecular surface shape Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W398 - W402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kinoshita and M. Ota P-cats: prediction of catalytic residues in proteins from their tertiary structures Bioinformatics, September 1, 2005; 21(17): 3570 - 3571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Urbaniak, A. Crossman, T. Chang, T. K. Smith, D. M. F. van Aalten, and M. A. J. Ferguson The N-Acetyl-D-glucosaminylphosphatidylinositol De-N-acetylase of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Biosynthesis Is a Zinc Metalloenzyme J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 22831 - 22838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kinoshita and H. Nakamura Identification of the ligand binding sites on the molecular surface of proteins Protein Sci., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 711 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tanaka, T. Fukui, S. Fujiwara, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka Concerted Action of Diacetylchitobiose Deacetylase and Exo-{beta}-D-glucosaminidase in a Novel Chitinolytic Pathway in the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30021 - 30027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Maynes, C. Garen, M. M. Cherney, G. Newton, D. Arad, Y. Av-Gay, R. C. Fahey, and M. N. G. James The Crystal Structure of 1-D-myo-Inosityl 2-Acetamido-2-deoxy-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside Deacetylase (MshB) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis Reveals a Zinc Hydrolase with a Lactate Dehydrogenase Fold J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2003; 278(47): 47166 - 47170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||