| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Academic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
2 DePaul University, Department of Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA
3 Krebs Institute for Biomolecular Research, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Reprint requests to: Colin D. Bingle, Academic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK; e-mail: c.d.bingle{at}sheffield.ac.uk; fax: 00-44 (0) 114-272-1104; or C. Jeremy Craven, Krebs Institute for Biomolecular Research, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK; e-mail: c.j.craven{at}sheffield.ac.uk.; fax: 00-44 (0) 114-272-8697.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 TOP Abstract IntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsElectronic supplemental materialReferences |
|---|
Keywords: PLUNC; BPI; rapid evolution; innate immunity
Abbreviations: at, Arabidopsis thaliana • b, bovine • c, chicken • cg, Crassostrea gigas (pacific oyster) • ci, Ciona intestinalis • t, Trout • cael, Caenorhabditis elegans • ec, Equus caballus (horse) • h, human • m, mouse • r, rat
Supplemental material: See www.proteinscience.org
Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.03332704.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsElectronic supplemental materialReferences |
|---|
We recently showed that the human PLUNC gene (Bingle and Bingle 2000) belongs to a family of at least seven genes located in a 300 kB locus on chromosome 20q11.2 (Bingle and Craven 2002), and we further showed that the PLUNC family proteins are predicted to demonstrate significant 3D similarity to BPI and LBP. We have defined two subgroups of PLUNC family proteins: the short (SPLUNC1, 2, 3, etc.) and the long (LPLUNC1, 2, 3, etc.) proteins. "Short" proteins have homology only to the N-terminal domain of BPI, whereas "long" proteins have homology to both the N- and C-terminal domains of BPI and LBP. Within this classification the protein originally designated hPLUNC becomes hSPLUNC1. In addition to the predicted structural similarity to LBP/BPI, there are a number of observations that suggest that PLUNC family proteins may function in host defense against bacteria. The rat protein, PSP, has been shown to interact with bacterial membranes (Robinson et al. 1997). hSPLUNC1 is present in the antimicrobial fraction of human nasal secretions (Cole et al. 2002), and has been shown to be increased in the sputum of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Di et al. 2003). In addition, PLUNC family proteins are characteristically expressed in regions of the respiratory tract, oro- and nasopharynx (Weston et al. 1999; Bingle and Bingle 2000; Le Clair et al. 2001; Bingle and Craven 2002; Di et al. 2003), which are sites of significant bacterial load and locations where LBP and BPI are not significantly expressed, although certain cell lines from these tissues have been shown to express both proteins (Dentener et al. 2000; Canny et al. 2002). Host defense proteins in these regions may be directly bactericidal, they may be bacteriostatic, or they may play a role in preventing an inappropriate inflammatory response (Ganz 2002).
Our previous study (Bingle and Craven 2002) was restricted to the human PLUNC family proteins. In this article we survey the extent to which PLUNC family proteins exist in other species, and whether the molecular evolution of the proteins (both at the level of paralogs and orthologs) provides any clues to their function.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsElectronic supplemental materialReferences |
|---|
. Protein sequences, accession codes, alternative nomenclature, and details of the extent to which sequences are novel and/or predicted/experimentally confirmed are available as Supplemental Material. We identified 12 homologs of the human PLUNC family proteins in both the mouse and the rat. The coverage in the databases for other species is much less complete; however, the databases contain four bovine homologs, and one homolog each for horse and chicken. For the cow proteins, we have included those proteins previously identified in the literature (Wheeler et al. 2002), but ESTs also exist for proteins similar to LPLUNC2 and LPLUNC4. A number of the plunc family members that we identified have previously been described separately, with a varied nomenclature (Poulsen et al. 1986; Dear et al. 1991; Mirels and Ball 1992; Wheeler et al. 2002; Andrault et al. 2003). Where the orthology to the human PLUNC family proteins is clear (see below) we use our nomenclature for these proteins (Bingle and Craven 2002). Where the orthology is unclear, we maintain the original names in the literature. A list of alternative nomenclatures is provided in Supplemental Material.
|
LPLUNC4 was unique among the PLUNC family proteins that we previously described (Bingle and Craven 2002), as it was not complete at the N-terminal end. To complete the sequence we identified a series of mouse ESTs that extended the mouse sequence in the 5' direction. These sequences were subsequently mapped onto the mouse and rat genome sequences to identify the intron/exon arrangement. This information was used to generate a complete open reading frame for both the mouse and rat genes. Both predicted proteins contain a signal peptide. This information was then used to predict the complete human LPLUNC4 gene. The LPLUNC4 gene contains a very small third exon (63bp) compared to all of the other PLUNC family genes as well as a large additional exon, which we term exon 3b. Subsequently, the sequence of human LPLUNC4 was confirmed by a complete cDNA sequence (AX283507 [GenBank] ) within the patent divison of Genbank. A further alternatively spliced human LPLUNC4 sequence with an extended third exon is also found in the patent division (AX283509 [GenBank] ).
Identification of orthologous relationships
The completeness of the mouse genome sequence allowed the definition of the PLUNC family gene locus (Fig. 2). For the rat, the genomic data are slightly less complete, and therefore, the exact size of the locus remains to be completely defined. It appears to be highly similar to that seen in the mouse. In all three species the PLUNC family proteins have therefore remained in a compact cluster.
|
), genomic locus (Fig. 2), and pairwise identity matrices (Supplemental Material) it was possible to define clear 1:1 orthologs (Waterston et al. 2002) in humans, mice, and rats for LPLUNC1, LPLUNC2, LPLUNC3, LPLUNC4, LPLUNC6, SPLUNC1, and SPLUNC3. These proteins satisfy the requirements of reciprocal best matches, and the genes are present in closely similar locations in the loci, taking into account the insertion of a small number of nonorthologous genes. These definitions are further strengthened by the fact that the pairwise amino acid identity between these orthologs is always greater than 55%, which contrasts clearly with the typically much lower similarity observed between paralogs in the PLUNC family. Orthologs can be identified for SPLUNC5 and LPLUNC5 in the mouse and rat only. From a more subjective assessment of their position in the phylogenetic tree, bovine members of the LPLUNC1 and SPLUNC1 groups were also identified. For the other members of the PLUNC family the orthology is less clear. mPSP and rPSP satisfy the criteria for 1:1 orthologs, although they are the most dissimilar mouse/rat pair in the family, with only 69% pairwise identity. The human ortholog of these proteins is potentially hSPLUNC2 (Emes et al. 2003), but this is not a clear 1:1 orthology, as hSPLUNC2 is equally similar to rSMGB and mSPLUNC4. The similarity of rSMGB and mSPLUNC4 is even lower than for mPSP and rPSP, and rSMGB is only weakly more similar to mSPLUNC4 (44%) than it is to mPSP (38%). The bovine proteins bSP30a and bSP30b (Wheeler et al. 2002) are very weakly more similar to hSPLUNC2 than to any other protein, but at a level too low to propose a close orthologous relationship. Likewise, cTENP is potentially a weak ortholog of the LPLUNC2 proteins. The protein hBASE is discussed further below. The limited published expression data is consistent with the orthologous relationships outlined above (Poulsen et al. 1986; Mirels and Ball 1992; Le Clair et al. 2001; Bingle and Craven 2002; Andrault et al. 2003). In our current analysis there are two exceptions to the rule of low pairwise identity between paralogous proteins in the PLUNC family. The bovine proteins bSP30a and bSP30b share 83% pairwise amino acid identity, and the proteins SPLUNC1 and SPLUNC5 share 62% pairwise identity in the mouse, and 59% pairwise in the rat. Along with the restricted species distribution of the SPLUNC1 and SPLUNC5 genes and their close proximity in the locus, it appears that SPLUNC1 and SPLUNC5 have arisen by a comparatively recent gene duplication that postdates the divergence of the human–rodent lineages.
Using the criteria we describe above for the definition of the PLUNC family orthologs we would classify mBPI and rBPI as the true orthologs of human BPI. First, mBPI and human BPI share 53% amino acid identity, whereas the next closest human protein is human LBP with which it shares only 38% identity. The reverse relationship also holds, that mBPI is the closest murine homolog of human BPI. The figures are similar for rBPI, and these relationships are reflected by the location of mBPI and rBPI in the same branch of the phylogenetic tree as hBPI. Second, the mBPI and rBPI genes are located in a region synteneic to that of hBPI, between the TGM2 and LBP genes (Gray et al. 1993). cDNA clones of mBPI (AK033770 [GenBank] ) have recently appeared in the public databases, along with an automated prediction for rBPI (XM_230800 [GenBank] ) of a sequence similar but not identical to our prediction. Neither of these sequences are annotated as orthologs of human BPI, presumably due to the low sequence similarity, although the genomic location of mBPI was recently also proposed by Andrault et al. (2003). Proof that these sequences are the functional counterparts of hBPI will require further studies.
Patterns of exon sizes
Exon sizes were collated for all the complete mouse, rat, and human sequences. The sizes of exons for one representative of each paralog is shown in Figure 3. Between orthologous genes, the exon sizes are generally well conserved (data not shown). As has been previously observed (Gray et al. 1993), the sizes of exons are well conserved across the BPI/CETP/PLTP/LBP family, with a small degree of variation in the final exon, which in the case of CETP may have functional consequences (Bruce et al. 1998). The long PLUNC family genes generally display a very similar pattern of exon sizes to those of the BPI/CETP/PLTP/LBP genes, especially for exons 4 to 15. In contrast, exon 3 is highly variable in size, and LPLUNC4 includes the additional exon, exon 3b. The short PLUNC family genes preserve the exons sizes for exons 4 to 7 found in the BPI/CETP/PLTP/LBP proteins and the long PLUNC family proteins. The greatest variation in the short PLUNC family genes occurs in the first coding exon. The structural consequences of these facts are discussed further below.
|
With the exception of BASE (see below), analysis using the 3DPSSM 3D-threading server (Kelley et al. 2000) confidently predicted all proteins in this study to share a similar fold to at least one domain of BPI (data not shown). Furthermore, all proteins, with the exception of BASE and the two proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana, conserve the cysteine pair corresponding to the disulphide bond found in BPI.
Attempts to thread the complete LPLUNC4 sequence onto the BPI structure provided a firm alignment to BPI only beyond residue L227, corresponding to residue I58 of BPI. I58 lies very close to the boundary of sequence encoded by exons 3 and 4 in BPI (Fig. 4A). The 3DPSSM algorithm was unable to confidently map the residues between this point and the N terminus onto the BPI structure. However, the N-terminal portion of the sequence (once the signal peptide is excluded) was predicted to form a 
-strand and 
-helical segment as found at the N-terminal end of the BPI structure (Beamer et al. 1997). In addition, the sequence corresponding to the extra exon 3b was not predicted to form stable secondary structure. We hypothesized that exons 3 and 3b might encode a largely unstructured insertion of approximately 150 residues that replaces the 40s hairpin (in the conventional BPI numbering scheme; see description of the BPI structure below). Therefore, we used the 3DPSSM algorithm to predict the structure of a modified form of the hLPLUNC4 sequence in which exon 3b was deleted. This created a threading that successfully mapped residues 25–44 onto the N-terminal 20 residues of BPI, at a similarly high confidence level as the rest of the mapping of the structure (data not shown). Clear mapping to the BPI structure resumes at M56 (Fig. 4A). Consistent with the substantial disruption of structure in the 40s hairpin, the mapping also predicts the replacement of the 90–103 hairpin of BPI by a four-residue loop, as previously also found for the incomplete LPLUNC4 sequence (Bingle and Craven 2002).
|
Human–mouse sequence comparisons
The identification of orthologous pairs of human and mouse PLUNC family proteins allowed us to assess the degree and patterns of sequence conservation in the PLUNC and BPI families. Two measures were used: (1) sequence wide Ka/Ks, and (2) locally averaged sequence identity.
Ka/Ks
Ka/Ks (Hughes and Nei 1988) data for the PLUNC family and BPI/LBP/PLTP proteins is shown in Table 1. For domain containing protein regions, the median value for Ka/Ks in the human/mouse genomes is 0.061, with a range of 0.015–0.178 at the 16th to 83rd percentiles (Waterston et al. 2002). Therefore, with the exception of LPLUNC4, for which the sequence conservation is further discussed below, all the PLUNC family proteins show substantially elevated rates of molecular evolution. Similarly elevated values are observed for BPI and LBP, and also for the functionally unclassified protein BPIL2 (Mulero et al. 2002).
|
). In most sequences the pattern is not signficantly different from random. In LPLUNC4, however, the pattern is quite different, as it contains an approximately 200-residue stretch that is almost totally conserved. This region corresponds to a GL rich region that we have previously commented upon (Bingle and Craven 2002) which is encoded by the 3' end of exon 3b, and to the remainder of the N-terminal domain encoded by exons 4 to 8 and part of exon 9. In this 200-residue stretch there are only three amino acid substitutions; thus, this region is under intense purifying selection (i.e., selection acting to purge mutations).
It was also investigated whether the sequence variability between human/mouse orthologous pairs mapped to equivalent positions in the 3D structure of BPI for groups of PLUNC family proteins. No statistically significant clustering could be detected (data not shown).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsElectronic supplemental materialReferences |
|---|
Our results here show that clusters of genes orthologous to the PLUNC family genes are also present in the mouse and rat genomes, and that a phylogenetic tree robustly classifies the PLUNC family proteins into a separate branch to the BPI/LBP/CETP/PLTP proteins (Fig. 1). The proteins falling into the PLUNC family branch are exclusively from air-breathing vertebrates, whereas the BPI branch also contains proteins from invertebrates and plants. Definitive proof that the PLUNC family proteins are restricted to air-breathing vertebrates will only be possible with the completion of genome sequences from more diverse species.
In turn, the PLUNC family branch approximately subdivides into two subbranches of long and short proteins (see below regarding LPLUNC1 and LPLUNC5). Because we restricted comparison to a portion of the N-terminal domain, we can infer that this division in the phylogenetic tree is a true reflection of detailed amino acid sequence, rather than a consequence of differences necessitated by the one- or two-domain nature of the proteins involved. The division of the tree into short and long branches strongly argues against the hypothesis that the short and long proteins might form agonist/antagonist pairs. A similar grouping of the short proteins is also observed in the genomic locus (Fig. 2).
The structural similarity of the two domains of the long proteins strongly suggests they arose from a duplication event in a one-domain protein. As PLUNC family proteins are apparently restricted to air-breathing vertebrates, whereas two domain BPI like proteins in general are found in a wide range of species (including distant homologs in plants and worms), it appears the short PLUNC family proteins must have arisen from a comparatively recent deletion of the C-terminal domain. If this deletion occurred following a duplication of a precursor of the LPLUNC1/5 genes, this would explain the positioning of the SPLUNC genes between the LPLUNC2/3/4/6 and LPLUNC1/5 genes in the genomic locus, and the positioning of LPLUNC1/5 proteins slightly closer to the SPLUNC proteins in the phylogenetic tree. There is also evidence for a link between LPLUNC1/5 and the SPLUNC genes in the detailed sizes of exons 4–7 (see Supplemental Material).
Rapid molecular evolution of the PLUNC family proteins supports a role in innate immunity
Very recently it has become possible to perform whole genome-wide analyses of the evolution of human and mouse orthologs (Waterston et al. 2002; Emes et al. 2003). Such analysis has shown that, for instance, 80% of proteins have a 1:1 ortholog in the corresponding genome, and that domain containing orthologs will share on average 81%–99% (16th to 83rd percentiles) sequence identity (Waterston et al. 2002). The levels of sequence identity between the orthologs in the PLUNC family are much lower than this, being in the range 45%–76% (with the notable exception of LPLUNC4 as discussed above). An alternative measure of the evolutionary pressure on proteins is the Ka/Ks ratio (Hughes and Nei 1988; Hurst 2002). It has been observed that an elevated Ka/Ks ratio, and hence rapid molecular evolution, is a frequent characteristic of proteins involved in host defense (Hurst and Smith 1999; Waterston et al. 2002; Emes et al. 2003). The data for the PLUNC family proteins (Table 1) indicate that this family is evolving more rapidly than the eight families with the highest median Ka/Ks described in Table 13 of Waterston et al. (2002). Six of these families are involved in host defense and immunity. Thus, the data are consistent with a role in innate immunity; however, proteins involved in other functions also exhibit rapid evolution. For instance, the p450 family of proteins exhibit elevated Ka/Ks values, and are involved in the metabolism of toxic compounds. Such a function therefore appears to necessitate rapid adaptive change (Emes et al. 2003), and a clearance or transport role is an alternative possible function for the PLUNC family. More detailed analysis of whether the elevated Ka/Ks values observed in the PLUNC family are the result of reduced purifying selection, or of positive selection at a few sites must await the availability of many more vertebrate genome sequences.
The clustering of the PLUNC family genes also probably reflects the rapid evolution of the PLUNC protein family as a whole, with gene duplication occurring more rapidly than gene dispersion. Similarly, the conservation of exon sizes in the presence of very low paralogous similarities may reflect the effect of rapid evolution following rather recent paralogous duplications.
LPLUNC4 displays unique features: An extreme case, or a new function?
To discuss the unique features of the LPLUNC4 proteins, it is helpful first to consider some features of the BPI fold (Fig. 4A). The BPI fold can be described as two distorted "barrels," connected by an interdomain sheet (Beamer et al. 1997). Each barrel is akin to a long thin barrel where two of the strands are replaced by long -helices. The break in the side of the barrel produced by these helices generates the opening to the lipid binding pockets. The -sheet connecting the two barrels comprises a number of strands from each domain. In each domain, these strands form the first and the last secondary structure elements in the sequences. The first two coding exons, exons 2 and 3, encode residues 1–55. These residues comprise the signal peptide, the first strand in the interdomain sheet, the first long -helix, and the 40s hairpin at the end of the barrel distal to the interdomain sheet. This hairpin (which we refer to throughout as the "40s hairpin") contains a positively charged loop that has been suggested to be important for the disruption of the phopholipid/divalent cation interactions in the bacterial outer membrane. The role of this loop, however, is not definitively established, because it has also been proposed to be involved in the LPS neutralizing and antimicrobial roles of BPI, yet the sequence is moderately well conserved in LBP, which is neither LPS neutralizing nor directly antimicrobial. The sequence encoded by exon 4 onwards forms the four long runs of twisted and somewhat irregular structure that form the pseudo -barrel before the second long helix that then runs into the final strands of the N-terminal domain that are part of the interdomain -sheet. The topology of the C-terminal domain is similar, although somewhat less regular.
We previously noted (Bingle and Craven 2002) that although the PLUNC family is predicted to be structurally similar to BPI, there is predicted to be a diversity of structure, especially in the tip of the N-terminal domain distal to the interdomain region. Such diversity is not predicted for LBP, PLTP, and CETP. The variability in the structure in this region, coupled with the low sequence identity between sequences, made it very difficult to predict a clear structural basis to the variability between sequences. Analysis was further complicated by the fact that a complete sequence was not available at that time for hLPLUNC4.
Starting from the complete sequence of the LPLUNC4 proteins, and the associated exon structure, it is now possible to refine the picture of the pattern of variability. As we have described above, it appears that a consistent model for LPLUNC4 can be constructed by assuming that exons 3 and 3b encode a large unstructured insertion that substantially replaces the 40s hairpin. Across the LPLUNC family, exon 3 is by far the most variable fully coding exon in terms of size (Fig. 3B), suggesting that some aspects of the model of LPLUNC4 can be extended to the other LPLUNC proteins, and that the predominant features of variability in the LPLUNC proteins reside in the nature of the structure in the region homologous to the 40s hairpin.
In the short PLUNC family proteins the variability appears to reside instead in exon 2, which encodes the N-terminal part of the protein. Further analysis is considerably more difficult, as the nature of the structure in this redundant interdomain -sheet region cannot be modeled on BPI. In SPLUNC1, this variability is so great that there is a significant difference in the lengths of the human, mouse, and rat proteins (see Supplemental Material).
This interpretation of LPLUNC4 as a paradigm for the rest of the LPLUNC proteins is, however, challenged by the observation that the approximately 200-residue portion of sequence encoded by the 3' end of exon 3b and extending through most of the rest of the N-terminal domain is >97% conserved between human and mouse, in complete contrast to all the other sequences in the PLUNC or BPI families (Fig. 4B). If the enhanced molecular evolution in the PLUNC family proteins and BPI and LBP proteins is indeed due to interaction with a rapidly evolving pathogen, then this effect appears to be completely replaced by extreme purifying selection in a large part of one domain of LPLUNC4.
A second noteworthy feature in the LPLUNC4 sequence is the GL-rich sequence GLLGGGGLLGDGGLLGGGGVL, which is encoded by the 3' end of exon 3b, and is therefore, positioned just to the C-terminal end of the putative greatly expanded and unstructured 40s loop. This curious sequence is not unique to LPLUNC4, as a highly similar sequence (GLLGSGGLLGGGGLLGHGGVF) is found in hLPLUNC3, encoded at the end of exon 3. Two smaller GL-rich sequences are also found in the SPLUNC1 proteins (Bingle and Craven 2002) and are also encoded by exon 3. The cDNA for the alternatively spliced variant of hLPLUNC4 encodes an extra GL-rich repeated peptide N-terminal to the sequence encoded by exon 3b. In this variant, therefore, the 180-residue inserted segment is flanked at either side by GL-rich regions.
These observations therefore raise the question as to the functional homogeneity of the PLUNC family proteins. Does LPLUNC4 simply represent a somewhat extreme case in a broad spectrum of structural diversity in proteins with an underlying common function, or has LPLUNC4 evolved a completely new function? The large insertion and the unique pattern of conservation might suggest a new function, whereas the conserved GL-rich region that is also found in LPLUNC3 suggests a retained functional commonality.
Conclusions
In this study we have shown that PLUNC family proteins exist in a number of species, and that they appear to be restricted to air-breathing vertebrates. Comparison of the human and mouse orthologs shows that the family is very rapidly evolving, which is consistent with involvement in host defense. Comparison of paralogous proteins shows that, in the LPLUNC proteins, the size of the second coding exon (exon 3) is much more highly variable than is the size of the other exons, and that LPLUNC4 contains an extra exon (exon 3b) that encodes a putatively unfolded insert of approximately 150 residues. Exon 3 encodes sequence corresponding to the 40s hairpin of BPI, and the variability of this region may be key to differences in specificity between the members of the family. In the SPLUNC proteins, the variability appears to instead reside in the N-terminal sequence. LPLUNC4 is also anomalous compared to the other PLUNC family proteins, in that the rapid evolution between the human and mouse sequences is replaced by intense purifying selection in the majority of the part of the N-terminal domain that is predicted to be structured. These results provide a rational framework upon which to base further functional studies of PLUNC family proteins and their potential role in innate immunity.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsElectronic supplemental materialReferences |
|---|
was created using Molscript (Kraulis 1991), using the coordinates 1ewf
[PDB]
.pdb (Beamer et al 1997). |
Electronic supplemental material |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsElectronic supplemental materialReferences |
|---|
; a figure of exon sizes for individual proteins for exons 4–7.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsElectronic supplemental materialReferences |
|---|
Beamer, L.J., Carroll, S.F., and Eisenberg, D. 1997. Crystal structure of human BPI and two bound phospholipids at 2.4 Å resolution. Science 276: 1861–1864.
Bingle, C.D. and Bingle, L. 2000. Characterisation of the human plunc gene, a gene product with an upper airways and nasopharyngeal restricted expression pattern. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1493: 363–367.[Medline]
Bingle, C.D. and Craven, C.J. 2002. PLUNC: A novel family of candidate host defence proteins expressed in the upper airways and nasopharynx. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11: 937–943.
Bruce, C., Beamer, L.J., and Tall, A.R. 1998. The implications of the structure of the bactericidal/permeability increasing protein on the lipid-transfer function of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8: 426–434.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burge, C. and Karlin, S. 1997. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 78–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
Canny, G., Levy, O., Furuta, G.T., Narravula-Alipati, S., Sisson, R.B., Serhan, C.N., and Colgan, S.P. 2002. Lipid mediator-induced expression of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) in human mucosal epithelia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 3902–3907.
Cole, A.M., Liao, H., Stuchlik, O., Tilan, J., Pohl, J., and Ganz, T. 2002. Cationic polypeptides are required for antibacterial activity of human airway fluid. J. Immunol. 169: 6985–6991.
Dear, T.N., Boehm, T., Keverne, E.B., and Rabbitts, T.H. 1991. Novel genes for potential ligand-binding proteins in subregions of the olfactory mucosa. EMBO. J. 10: 2813–2829.[Medline]
Dentener, M.A., Vreugdenhil, A.C., Hoet, P.H., Vernooy, J.H., Nieman, F.H., Heumann, D., Janssen, Y.M., Buurman, W.A., and Wouters, E.F. 2000. Production of the acute-phase protein lipopolysaccharide-binding protein by respiratory type II epithelial cells: Implications for local defense to bacterial endotoxins. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 23: 146–153.
Di, Y.-P., Harper, R., Zhao, Y., Pahlavan, N., Finkbeiner, W., and Wu, R. 2003. Molecular cloning and characterization of spurt, a human novel gene that is retinoic acid-inducible and encodes a secretory protein specific in upper respiratory tracts. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 1165–1173.
Egland, K.A., Vincent, J.J., Strausberg, R., Lee, B., and Pastan, I. 2003. Discovery of the breast cancer gene BASE using a molecular approach to enrich for genes encoding membrane and secreted proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 1099–1104.
Elsbach, P. and Weiss, J. 1998. Role of the bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein in host defence. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10: 45–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
Emes, R.D., Goodstadt, L., Winter, E.E., and Ponting, C.P. 2003. Comparison of the genomes of human and mouse lays the foundation of genome zoology. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12: 701–709
Fearon, D. and Locksley, R. 1996. The instructive role of innate immunity in the acquired immune response. Science 272: 50–54.[Abstract]
Felsenstein, J. 1989. PHYLIP—Phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164–166.
Fenton, M.J. and Golenbock, D.T. 1998. LPS-binding proteins and receptors. J. Leukoc. Biol. 64: 25–32.[Abstract]
Ganz, T. 2002. Epithelia: Not just physical barriers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 3357–3358.
Gray, P.W., Corcorran, A.E., Eddy, R.L., Byers, M.G., and Shows, T.B. 1993. The genes for the lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) and the bactericidal permeability increasing protein (BPI) are encoded in the same region of human chromosome 20. Genomics 15: 188–190.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hughes, A.L. and Nei, M. 1988. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335: 167–170.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hurst, L.D. 2002. The Ka/Ks ratio: Diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet. 18: 486–487.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hurst, L.D. and Smith, N.G. 1999. Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr. Biol. 9: 747–750.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelley, L.A., MacCallum, R.M., and Sternberg, M.J. 2000. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol. 299: 499–520.[Medline]
Kraulis, P.J. 1991. Molscript—A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946–950.[CrossRef]
LeClair, E.E., Nguyen, L., Bingle, L., MacGowan, A., Singleton, V., Ward, S.J., and Bingle, C.D. 2001. Genomic organization of the mouse plunc gene and expression in the developing airways and thymus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 284: 792–797.[CrossRef][Medline]
Levy, O. 2002. Therapeutic potential of the bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 11: 159–167.[CrossRef][Medline]
Martin, T.R. 2000. Recognition of bacterial endotoxin in the lungs. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 23: 128–132.
Mirels, L. and Ball, W.D. 1992. Neonatal rat submandibular gland protein SMG-A and parotid secretory protein are alternatively regulated members of a salivary protein multigene family. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 2679–2687.
Mulero, J.J., Boyle, B.J., Bradley, S., Bright, J.M., Nelken, S.T., Ho, T.T., Mize, N.K., Childs, J.D., Ballinger, D.G., Ford, J.E., et al. 2002. Three new human members of the lipid transfer/lipopolysaccharide binding protein family (LT/LBP). Immunogenetics 54: 293–300.[CrossRef][Medline]
Poulsen, K., Jakobsen, B.K., Mikkelsen, B.M., Harmark, K., Nielsen, J.T., and Hjorth, J.P. 1986. Coordination of murine parotid secretory protein and salivary amylase expression EMBO. J. 5: 1891–1896.[Medline]
Robinson, C.P., Bounous, D.I., Alford, C.E., Nguyen, K.H., Nanni, J.M., Peck, A.B., and Humphreys-Beher, M.G. 1997. PSP expression in murine lacrimal glands and function as a bacteria binding protein in exocrine secretions. Am. J. Physiol. 272: G863–G871.
Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406–425.[Abstract]
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680.
Waterston, R.H., Lindbald-Toh, K., Birney, E., Rogers, J., Abril, J.F., Agarwal, P., Agarwala, R., Ainscough, R., Alexandersson, M., An, P., et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520–562.[CrossRef][Medline]
Weston, W.M., LeClair, E.E., Trzyna, W., McHugh, K.M., Nugent, P., Lafferty, C.M., Ma, L., Tuan, R.S., and Greene, R.M. 1999. Differential display identification of plunc, a novel gene expressed in embryonic palate, nasal epithelium, and adult lung. J. Biol. Chem. 274:13698–13703.
Wheeler, T.T., Haigh, B.J., McCracken, J.Y., Wilkins, R.J., Morris, C.A., and Grigor, M.R. 2002. The BSP30 salivary proteins from cattle, LUNX/PLUNC and von Ebner’s minor salivary gland protein are members of the PSP/LBP superfamily of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1579: 92–100.[Medline]
Yang, Z. and Nielsen, R. 2000. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 32–43.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. A. Barnes, L. Bingle, and C. D. Bingle Pulmonary Genomics, Proteomics, and PLUNCs Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2008; 38(4): 377 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Candiano, M. Bruschi, N. Pedemonte, L. Musante, R. Ravazzolo, S. Liberatori, L. Bini, L. J. V. Galietta, and O. Zegarra-Moran Proteomic analysis of the airway surface liquid: modulation by proinflammatory cytokines Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): L185 - L198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
