HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chamberlain, A. K. Articles by Bowie, J. U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chamberlain, A. K. Articles by Bowie, J. U. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

FOR THE RECORD

Asymmetric amino acid compositions of transmembrane -strands

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles-Department of Energy Center for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1570, USA

Reprint requests to: James U. Bowie, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles-DOE Center for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Boyer Hall, University of California, Los Angeles, 611 Charles E. Young Drive E., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1570, USA; e-mail: bowie{at}mbi.ucla.edu; fax: (310) 206-4749.

(RECEIVED March 30, 2004; FINAL REVISION May 11, 2004; ACCEPTED May 12, 2004)

	Abstract

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
In contrast to water-soluble proteins, membrane proteins reside in a heterogeneous environment, and their surfaces must interact with both polar and apolar membrane regions. As a consequence, the composition of membrane proteins’ residues varies substantially between the membrane core and the interfacial regions. The amino acid compositions of helical membrane proteins are also known to be different on the cytoplasmic and extracellular sides of the membrane. Here we report that in the 16 transmembrane -barrel structures, the amino acid compositions of lipid-facing residues are different near the N and C termini of the individual strands. Polar amino acids are more prevalent near the C termini than near the N termini, and hydrophobic amino acids show the opposite trend. We suggest that this difference arises because it is easier for polar atoms to escape from the apolar regions of the bilayer at the C terminus of a -strand. This new characteristic of -barrel membrane proteins enhances our understanding of how a sequence encodes a membrane protein structure and should prove useful in identifying and predicting the structures of trans-membrane -barrels.

Keywords: barrel; membrane protein; snorkeling; membrane polarity; protein structure; genome

Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.04777304.

	Introduction

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Transmembrane (TM) -barrel proteins comprise 2%–3% of the Gram-negative bacterial genomes and belong to a variety of protein functional groups, such as nonspecific and specific pores, transporters, lipases, and proteases (Wimley 2003). As is exemplified by Omp A, the polypeptides are secreted into the periplasmic space, where they bind a chaperone (Mori and Ito 2001; Kleinschmidt and Tamm 2002). Their insertion into the outer membrane is then facilitated by binding to a periplasmic lipopolysaccharide. In eukaryotes, TM -barrels are found in the outer membrane of mitochondria and chloroplasts (Benz 1994; Fischer et al. 1994). The known structures include -barrels containing 8–22 -strands (Schulz 2002). Frequently, the strands are contained within the same polypeptide chain, although there are exceptions. For example, in the heptamer, -hemolysin, each subunit contributes two -strands to a 14-stranded -barrel (Song et al. 1996).

The membrane can influence the protein’s amino acid composition. Some amino acids in TM helical proteins have a bias toward residing on the cytoplasmic or extracellular side of the membrane (Sipos and von Heijne 1993). In -barrel proteins, however, there are apparently no strong periplasmic/extracellular biases, with the exception of Lys (Ulmschneider and Sansom 2001). Recently, we uncovered another amino acid bias in -helical membrane proteins: The amino acid composition differs between the N- and C-terminal ends of the helices (Chamberlain et al. 2004). In general, the N-terminal end contains more hydrophilic amino acids, whereas the C-terminal end contains more hydrophobic amino acids. This preference appears to arise from the geometry of the -helix and from the preference of hydrophilic amino acids to "snorkel" their polar atoms out of the membrane. Side chains in a helix extend back toward the N terminus, making it easier for polar atoms to escape the bilayer when they reside at this terminus.

Here we report an analogous trend in the amino acid pattern of -barrels; namely, that the amino acid distribution varies between the N- and C-terminal ends of the strands within the membrane. In TM strands, the N-terminal half contains an abundance of hydrophobic amino acids when compared to the C-terminal half. The hydrophilic amino acids have the opposite preference. These trends define a new constraint on -barrel membrane protein structures that may also arise from the limitations imposed on the side chains by the membrane polarity gradient.

	Results

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
We identified the transmembrane -strands of 16 -barrel membrane proteins and divided the transmembrane residues into groups based on their location in the structure. The 220 -strands contained a total of 2042 residues. We categorized each residue based on its burial or exposure to the membrane and on its location in one half of the membrane. We considered the membrane to be 30.0 Å thick and divided it into either two 15.0 Å sections or six 5.0 Å sections. Here we refer to the half of the membrane toward the N- or C-terminal end of the strands as the N- or C-terminal side of the membrane.

The frequencies of the amino acids facing the lipids differ in the N- and C-terminal regions of the membrane (Fig. 1A). Several hydrophobic amino acids are more frequent in the N-terminal half of the membrane than in the C-terminal half. For example, Ile is twice as frequent in the N-terminal half compared with the C-terminal half. It comprises 9.1% (48 of 528) of the amino acids in the N terminus and only 4.7% (24 of 515) in the C terminus. Leu and Val also show a similar bias for the N-terminal side. In contrast, the C terminus has a higher frequency of many polar amino acids compared with the N terminus, and particularly Arg, Gln, and Tyr. Tyr is the most common amino acid in the C-terminal half, with a frequency of 16.8%. Of the Tyr residues facing the lipids, 89 of 117 (76%) are in the C-terminal half, whereas 28 of 117 (24%) are in the N-terminal half.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Amino acid frequencies in the -strands of 16 -barrel membrane proteins. (A) The frequency of amino acids facing the membrane lipids in the N-terminal (black) and C-terminal (gray) halves of the membrane. Glu and Arg are not found in the N-terminal half. (B) The statistical significance of the N/C bias of lipid-facing amino acids. For each amino acid, we show the random probability of having the observed distribution, or a more biased distribution, for one particular membrane half. A small probability indicates that the likelihood of having the observed bias is improbable. Amino acids with a gray bar above the drawn line have distributions with less than a 5% chance of occurring at random. (C) The frequency of amino acids facing into the -barrel in the N-terminal (black) and C-terminal (gray) halves of the strands. (D) The statistical significance of the N/C bias of amino acids facing into the -barrel center. The amino acids are listed in order of decreasing hydrophobicity (Engelman et al. 1986).

In contrast, the amino acids facing into the core of the -barrel do not differ appreciably in composition between the two halves of the -strands (Fig. 1C,D). Overall, the hydrophobic amino acids are less frequent and the hydrophilic amino acids are more frequent than in the residues facing the lipids. The N- and C-terminal frequencies, however, are essentially equal. Phe is the only exception, having a bias for the C-terminal half and a statistical likelihood of 0.014. Of the interior-facing residues, none of the hydrophilic residues shows a statistically significant composition bias, even though the interior of the -barrel is generally more hydrophilic than the exterior. These results suggest that the residue composition differences arise from interactions with the bilayer, rather than from constraints intrinsic to -barrel geometry.

The composition differences in the residues facing the membrane lipids are also seen by dividing the membrane into six 5.0 Å sections from the N- to C-terminal sides of the membrane. As shown in Figure 2A, the hydrophilic amino acids Glu, Gln, Asp, Asn, Lys, and Arg are more populated in the membrane edges and, in particular, in the C-terminal edge. We found all three Glu residues and seven of eight Arg residues in the most C-terminal membrane section. Tyr makes up nearly one-fourth (23.3%) of the most C-terminal section and only 11.3% of the most N-terminal section (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the hydrophobic amino acids are most frequent in the N-terminal side of the membrane core (Fig. 2C). The combined total of Phe, Ile, Leu, and Val is most populated in the second membrane section, making up 64.5% of the total amino acids. This section includes residues between 5.0 and 10.0 Å from the N-terminal edge of our 30.0 Å-thick membrane. The preference of the hydrophobic amino acids for this section arises from their high frequency in the membrane core and from their bias to be more populated in the N-terminal halves of the strands.

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Amino acid frequencies in six 5.0 Å sections of the membrane from the N-terminal side (abscissa, left) to the C-terminal side (abscissa, right) of the membrane. (A) The frequencies of some of the polar amino acids, Asp (solid bar), Glu (diagonally hatched bar), Lys (vertical stripes), Asn (open bar), Gln (vertically hatched bar), and Arg (diagonal stripes). (B) The frequency of Tyr alone. (C) The frequencies of the hydrophobic amino acids, Phe (solid bar), Ile (diagonally hatched bar), Leu (vertically striped bar), and Val (open bar).

	Discussion

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Extension of the Tyr side chain out of the membrane in different rotamers. The distance the Tyr O atom extends out of the membrane core depends on the Tyr 1 angle. The O atom extends 5.0 Å toward the C-terminal side of the membrane with 1 = 180°, but it only extends 3.2 Å and 2.0 Å toward the N-terminal side with 1 = +60° and –60°, respectively. These distances are the extension of the O atom from the C along the membrane normal. For each 1 angle, we averaged the distances of Tyr placed in eight different positions in -strands. These values are specific to lipid-facing Tyr residues. Residues facing inside the -barrel have a different angle between the N-C bond and the normal membrane, and therefore the 1 angles affect the O extension differently.

These results aid our understanding of transmembrane -barrels and could be directly applied to the prediction of -barrels from genomic sequences (Martelli et al. 2002; Wimley 2002; Zhai and Saier Jr. 2002). In particular, the identification of TM -strands in a sequence should be improved by knowing the amino acid composition in each -strand position. A more specific description of the -strands will become feasible as more structures become available. Thus, understanding how the amino acid composition varies in different regions of -barrels aids our interpretation of genomic information and illuminates the interactions between the membrane and transmembrane proteins.

	Materials and methods

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Choice of -barrel membrane proteins
The -barrel membrane proteins were selected from a list at the Max Planck Institute (http://www.mpibp-frankfurt.mpg.de/michel/public/memprotstruct.html). Each pair of proteins has less than 30% sequence identity (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/), and all structures were determined by X-ray crystallography to a resolution of 3.0 Å or better. The 16 PDB codes used were 1A0S [PDB] , 1E54 [PDB] , 1EK9 [PDB] , 1FEP [PDB] , 1I78 [PDB] , 1K24 [PDB] , 1KMO [PDB] , 1PHO [PDB] , 1PRN [PDB] , 1QD6 [PDB] , 1QJ8 [PDB] , 1QJP [PDB] , 2FCP [PDB] , 2MPR [PDB] , 2POR [PDB] , and 7AHL [PDB] .

Identification of transmembrane residues
The strands making up each -barrel were identified by eye, and the secondary structure assignments were listed in the PDB header file. Each strand was represented as a vector from the second to the eighth C, and we inverted the vectors of the odd-numbered strands. By averaging the strand vectors of each protein, we calculated a vector normal to the membrane. If more than one subunit was in a crystal structure, we used all the subunits to determine the membrane normal, but used only one subunit in subsequent calculations. We identified the transmembrane residues by orienting a 30.0 Å-thick slab perpendicular to the membrane normal and positioning it along the membrane normal such that the average hydrophobicity (Fauchere and Pliska 1983) of the residues in the slab were a maximum. A residue was considered to be inside the membrane if its C atom was contained in this slab. The 16 structures contain 220 strands and 2042 transmembrane residues. None of the transmembrane strands contains any Cys residues.

We placed each residue into a group based on whether the side chain faced into or out of the center of the -barrel. A residue was counted as inward facing if its C atom was closer than its C atom to the center of mass of the -barrel. For Gly, we built in and used a H2 atom in place of the C atom. We further subdivided the residues according to the location of their C atoms in the membrane to the N- or C-terminal end of the strands. We used six 5.0 Å-thick slices or two 15.0 Å-thick slices of the membrane. The frequency of each amino acid in a membrane section is simply the number of counts of the amino acid divided by the total number of amino acids in that section. Error estimates of the frequencies are the square roots of the counts divided by the total number of amino acids. Because the strands of -barrels are antiparallel, misplacing the membrane toward one end of the -barrel would add counts of residues to both the N- and C-terminal membrane sections. In this way, our results that show a bias of certain residues for the N- or C-terminal regions of the membrane are not created by errors in the membrane placement.

Statistical test of amino acid bias
To test the statistical significance of the bias of an amino acid to reside in either the N-terminal half or C-terminal half of a trans-membrane -strand, we constructed a null model in which the amino acid is distributed randomly between the two halves. We then calculated the probability of finding the observed distribution or a more biased distribution, given this random null model. The probability is calculated from the binomial distribution, with the total number of trials equaling the total number of interior-facing or lipid-facing residues. A successful trial occurs when the amino acid is placed in the N terminus. The random frequency that an amino acid will occur in the N terminus is 50.6%, which is the average frequency over all amino acids. A low probability implies that the observed preference of the amino acid for one half is unlikely to occur by random chance.

Measurement of tyrosine side-chain extension
We measured the extension of Tyr side chain along the membrane normal from the Catom to the O atom in its three most common rotamers. We used the 1 and 2 angles from Dunbrack Jr.’s rotamer library (Dunbrack Jr. and Karplus 1993; Dunbrack Jr. and Cohen 1997) and present the average distances using eight positions in two TM barrel structures. These outward-facing positions were residues 223, 274, 292, and 324 in 1E54 [PDB] and 81, 95, 139, and 164 in 1QJP [PDB] .

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Yohan Lee for helping to define the transmembrane strands, and members of the laboratory for their critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant no. RO1 GM063919. J.U.B. is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

	References

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Benz, R. 1994. Permeation of hydrophilic solutes through mitochondrial outer membranes: Review on mitochondrial porins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1197: 167–196.[Medline]

Chamberlain, A.K., Lee, Y., Kim, S., and Bowie, J.U. 2004. Snorkeling fosters an amino acid composition bias in transmembrane helices. J. Mol. Biol. 339: 471–479.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dunbrack Jr., R.L. and Cohen, F.E. 1997. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 6: 1661–1681.[Abstract]

Dunbrack Jr., R.L. and Karplus, M. 1993. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 230: 543–574.[CrossRef][Medline]

Engelman, D.M., Steitz, T.A., and Goldman, A. 1986. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 15: 321–353.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fauchere, J.L., and Pliska, V. 1983. Hydrophobic parameters of amino acid side chains from the partitioning of N-acetyl-amino acid amides. Eur. J. Med. Chem.-Chim. Ther. 18: 369–375.

Fischer, K., Weber, A., Brink, S., Arbinger, B., Schunemann, D., Borchert, S., Heldt, H.W., Popp, B., Benz, R., Link, T.A., et al. 1994. Porins from plants. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of two new members of the porin family. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 25754–25760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kleinschmidt, J.H., and Tamm, L.K. 2002. Secondary and tertiary structure formation of the -barrel membrane protein OmpA is synchronized and depends on membrane thickness. J. Mol. Biol. 324: 319–330.[CrossRef][Medline]

Martelli, P.L., Fariselli, P., Krogh, A., and Casadio, R. 2002. A sequence-profile-based HMM for predicting and discriminating barrel membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl. 1): S46–S53.[Abstract]

Mori, H., and Ito, K. 2001. The Sec protein-translocation pathway. Trends Microbiol. 9: 494–500.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schulz, G.E. 2002. The structure of bacterial outer membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1565: 308–317.[Medline]

Sipos, L., and von Heijne, G. 1993. Predicting the topology of eukaryotic membrane proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 213: 1333–1340.[Medline]

Song, L., Hobaugh, M.R., Shustak, C., Cheley, S., Bayley, H., and Gouaux, J.E. 1996. Structure of staphylococcal -hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science 274: 1859–1866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ulmschneider, M.B., and Sansom, M.S. 2001. Amino acid distributions in integral membrane protein structures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1512: 1–14.[Medline]

Wimley, W.C. 2002. Toward genomic identification of -barrel membrane proteins: Composition and architecture of known structures. Protein Sci. 11: 301–312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

———. 2003. The versatile -barrel membrane protein. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13: 404–411.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhai, Y., and Saier Jr., M.H. 2002. The -barrel finder (BBF) program, allowing identification of outer membrane -barrel proteins encoded within prokaryotic genomes. Protein Sci. 11: 2196–2207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. K. Chamberlain and J. U. Bowie Analysis of Side-Chain Rotamers in Transmembrane Proteins Biophys. J., November 1, 2004; 87(5): 3460 - 3469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chamberlain, A. K. Articles by Bowie, J. U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chamberlain, A. K. Articles by Bowie, J. U. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?