HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ps.04835904v1 13/9/2470    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klose, J. Articles by Rothemund, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klose, J. Articles by Rothemund, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Hexa-histidin tag position influences disulfide structure but not binding behavior of in vitro folded N-terminal domain of rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2a

¹ Research Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, D-13125 Berlin, Germany
² Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-01620 Halle, Germany
³ Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany

Reprint requests to: Sven Rothemund, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Inselstrasse 22, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany, e-mail: sven_r{at}yahoo.com; fax: +49-341-97-15979; or Jana Klose, Research Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, Robert-Roessle-Str. 10, D-13125 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: jana_klose{at}yahoo.com; fax: +49-30-94793-159.

(RECEIVED April 23, 2004; FINAL REVISION May 17, 2004; ACCEPTED May 17, 2004)

	Abstract

TOP Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Materials and methods References

 
The oxidative folding, particularly the arrangement of disulfide bonds of recombinant extracellular N-terminal domains of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2a bearing five cysteines (C2 to C6), was investigated. Depending on the position of a His-tag, two types of disulfide patterns were found. In the case of an N-terminal His-tag, the disulfide bonds C2–C3 and C4–C6 were found, leaving C5 free, whereas the C-terminal position of the His-tag led to the disulfide pattern C2–C5 and C4–C6, and leaving C3 free. The latter pattern is consistent with the disulfide arrangement of the extracellular N-terminal domain of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1, which has six cysteines (C1 to C6) and in which C1 is paired with C3. However, binding data of the two differently disulfide-bridged domains show no significant differences in binding affinities to selected ligands, indicating the importance of the C-terminal portion of the N-terminal receptor domains, particularly the disulfide bond C4–C6 for ligand binding.

Keywords: protein folding; affinity tag; corticotropin-releasing factor receptor

Abbreviations: ACN, acetonitrile • BSA, bovine serum albumin • CDAP, cyanodimethylaminopyridinium tetrafluoroborate • CRF, corticotropin-releasing factor • DTT, dithiothreitol • GPCR, G protein–coupled receptor • GST, glutathione S-transferase • GuHCl, guanidinium hydrochloride • HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography • IAA, iodoacetamide • MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization • MBP, maltose binding protein • MS, mass spectrometry • NT, N terminus • RP, reversed-phase • SPA, scintillation proximity assay • TOF, time of flight

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.04835904.

	Introduction

TOP Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Affinity tags of fusion proteins are widely used in recombinant protein expression techniques. The most common affinity tags, such as poly-histidine (Bornhorst and Falke 2000), glutathione S-transferase (GST; Smith 2000), maltose binding protein (MBP; Sachdev and Chirgwin 2000), and streptavidin tags (Skerra and Schmidt 2000), are routinely used for increasing expression, enhancement of solubility, and protein purification. In novel developments of high-throughput screening techniques, such as scintillation proximity assay (SPA) and alphaScreen (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Inc.), one or two proteins, respectively, are attached to beads via affinity tags. It is known that large affinity tags (MBP, GST) influence the conformational homogeneity and hence the three-dimensional structure of in vivo folded target proteins (Smyth et al. 2003). To date, however, there are no data about the impact of small affinity tags, such as the (His)₆-tag, on the protein conformation and, especially, the disulfide pattern when generating cysteine-containing proteins by recombinant expression.

The large N-terminal domains of G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) class B, such as the receptor for the peptide hormone corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF; Vale et al. 1981), contain several cysteines. There are two receptor subtypes for CRF in mammals, the CRF₁ and CRF₂ receptor (Chang et al. 1993; Chen et al. 1993; Sklenar et al. 1993; Vita et al. 1993; Lovenberg et al. 1995; Stenzel et al. 1995; Smith 2000), for the latter three splice variants, CRF_2(a), CRF_2(b) and CRF_2(c), exist. The CRF₁ and CRF_2(b) receptor _N terminus (NT) without their putative signal sequence contain six cysteines (C1 through C6) and form three disulfide bridges. In contrast, the CRF_2(a) and the CRF_2(c) receptor NT without signal peptides exhibit only five cysteines (C2 through C6) and therefore forms only two disulfide bridges, leaving one cysteine unbound (Fig. 1). Recent studies on the N-terminal domains of the CRF receptors (CRF₁ receptor [Hofmann et al. 2001; Perrin et al. 2001], CRF_2(b) receptor [Perrin et al. 2003]), as well as other receptors of this class, such as PTHR1 (Grauschopf et al. 2000) and GLPR1 (Bazarsuren et al. 2002), showed that the N-terminal domains serve as the major ligand binding site. For the CRF₁ receptor, it is also known that the disulfide pattern of the N-terminal domain is critical for binding of the natural ligand CRF (Qi et al. 1997). Thus, a defined conformation of the N-terminal domains of CRF receptors is suggested to be important for interactions with the ligands.

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Alignment of the expressed CRF2(a) receptor N termini with an N- and C-terminal (His)6-tag, respectively.

	Results and Discussion

TOP Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Materials and methods References

Overexpression and in vitro folding
To investigate the influence of an N- and C-terminal (His)₆-tag, respectively, on the in vitro folding and resulting disulfide pattern of the five cysteine containing CRF_2(a) receptor NT, both recombinant proteins were produced in E. coli (Fig. 1). According to different algorithms (Persson and Argos 1996; Cserzo et al. 1997; Nielsen et al. 1997; Reczko et al. 2002), amino acids Ala¹⁹-Arg¹¹⁴ form the extracellular N-terminal domain of the rat CRF_2(a) receptor without signal peptide. Overexpression of the CRF_2(a) receptor NT with an N- and C-terminal (His)₆-tag, respectively, gave 40 to 60 mg N-(His)₆-CRF_2(a) receptor NT and 30 to 60 mg CRF_2(a)-C-(His)₆ receptor NT per liter cell culture. Here, the position of the (His)₆-tag had no remarkable influence on the expression levels. Sodium dodecylsulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of soluble and insoluble protein fractions showed that both CRF_2(a) receptor NTs were deposited in inclusion bodies almost exclusively, and that the apparent molecular size of both CRF_2(a) receptor NT is ~12.5 kDa according to the predicted molecular size. It should be noted that the presence of the (His)₆-tag on both termini led to increased expression levels in comparison to the untagged protein.

For subsequent protein renaturation, an in vitro refolding protocol according to procedures described elsewhere (Buchner and Rudolph 1991; Rudolph and Lilie 1996; Lilie et al. 1998) was applied. The optimized protocol led to a rapid reshuffling of improper disulfide bonds and to an enrichment of one folding species for the N- and C-terminally (His)₆-tagged protein, respectively, with yields of renaturation in a range of 40% to 50%. Because of the requirement of a high resolution for the separation of folding intermediates, preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to purify the oxidized products, with an overall yield of 10% for the entire folding and purification process.

Assignment of disulfide bridges
The characterization of disulfide patterns in the extracellular N-terminal domains of the N- and C-terminally (His)₆-tagged CRF_2(a) receptors was done by a combination of enzymatic/chemical cleavage and mass spectrometry (MS) of cleaved fragments. The homogeneity of the digested, final, purified refolding products was confirmed by the lack of differently connected species. It should be noted that CRF_2(a) receptor NT carries only five cysteines (C2 through C6); consequently, only two disulfide bridges and one unlinked cysteine can be expected. Moreover, a chemical cleavage at Asn⁶⁹-Gly⁷⁰ by hydroxylamine (Bornstei and Balian 1970) before the Glu-C digestion was necessary to increase the susceptibility of N-(His)₆-CRF_2(a) receptor NT for the enzyme. The following analysis of digested fragments revealed the linkages Cys⁶⁴(C4)–Cys⁹⁸(C6) and Cys⁴⁰(C2)–Cys⁵⁰(C3) leaving Cys⁸³(C5) as unbound (Table 2). For the CRF_2(a)-C-(His)₆ receptor NT, we faced the problem of disulfide scrambling (Glocker et al. 1995) due to the uneven number of cysteines when performing standard digestion at pH 7.5. For this case, we used the strategy for blocking the free cysteine applying alkylation (Sechi and Chait 1998) or cyanylation (Wakselman et al. 1976) at pH 5.7 with iodoacetamide (IAA) and cyanodimethylaminopyridinium tetrafluoroborate (CDAP), respectively. After enzymatic digestion of the alkylated or cyanylated NT using chymotrypsin, the found fragments clearly show disulfide bridging between Cys⁴⁰(C2) and Cys⁸³(C5) as well as Cys⁶⁴(C4) and Cys⁸³(C6) (Table 2). We concluded from these unambiguously obtained disulfide bridges that Cys⁵⁰(C3) is not involved in disulfide bonds. Thus, the disulfide pattern of N-(His)₆-CRF_2(a) receptor NT is not analog with disulfide bridges C1–C3, C2–C5, and C4–C6 found in both, CRF₁ receptor NT (Hofmann et al. 2001; Perrin et al. 2001) and CRF_2(b) receptor NT (Perrin et al. 2003), respectively, which were expressed as soluble, in vivo, folded proteins. In opposite, the CRF_2(a)-C-(His)₆ receptor NT shows a disulfide pattern in accordance with the described ones for CRF₁ receptor NT and CRF_2(b) receptor NT, respectively (Fig. 2).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Disulfide pattern of the expressed, in vitro refolded CRF2(a) receptor N termini with an N- and C-terminal (His)6-tag (B,C), respectively, in comparison to the in vivo folded CRF1 receptor N terminus (A). Unbound cysteines are marked with *. Cysteine 1 in CRF2(a) receptor N termini is located in the signal sequence and labeled in italics.

Ligand binding
The binding characteristics of selected ligands (Table 1) to the two N-terminal domains of the CRF_2(a) receptor, exhibiting different disulfide patterns due to the position of the (His)₆-tag, were estimated by competitive displacement studies of radiolabeled rat urocortin 1 using SPA technique. Here, the anchorage of the extracellular N-terminal domains on copper-loaded SPA beads was mediated via the (His)₆-tag. The binding data (Table 3) show no significant differences in binding behavior of the two N-terminal domains of the CRF_2(a) receptor (Fig. 3). Both domains show high affinities for the antagonist astressin (~5 nM) and moderate affinities for the N-terminally truncated rat urocortin 1(8–40; 50 to 70 nM), which in this assay is equipotent to the full-length rat urocortin 1(1–40). The completely reduced and ensuing alkylated CRF_2(a) receptor NT (C-terminal (His)₆-tag) did not show any binding.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Inhibition of specific [125I-Tyr0]-urocortin 1 binding to CRF-rNT by the unlabeled CRF-like ligands urocortin 1 (8–40) and astressin by using the SPA technology. All values are given as mean ± SEM. (A) Binding of urocortin 1 (8–40) to the CRF2(a) receptor N terminus with C-terminal (His)6-tag (filled circles) and N-terminal (His)6-tag (open circles). (B) Binding of astressin to the CRF2(a) receptor N terminus with C-terminal (His)6-tag (filled circles) and N-terminal (His)6-tag (open circles).

	Materials and methods

TOP Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Construction of expression plasmids
N-(His)₆-CRF_2(a) receptor NT
A PCR-amplified cDNA (312 bp, primers 5'-AGCTTGGGATC CGCCGAAGAGCTGCTTTTG-3' and 5'-GATGAGCTCTTAT CGGTAATGCAGGTC-3') coding for Ala¹⁹-Arg¹¹⁴ of the rat CRF_2(a) receptor was initially inserted into pQE-30 (Qiagen) via BamHI and SacI restriction sites. For expression reasons, the resulting vector was used as template for recloning a cDNA (348 bp) coding for rat CRF_2(a) receptor NT, including an N-terminal (His)₆-tag (primers 5'-TTAACCATGGGAGGATCGCATCACCAT-3' and 5'-CGGGGTCTCGAGCTCTTATCGGTAATG-3') into pET-15b (Novagen), using NcoI and XhoI restriction sites to yield the N-terminally (His)₆-tagged protein.

CRF_2(a)-C-(His)₆ receptor NT
To yield the C-terminally (His)₆-tagged protein, a cDNA (310 bp, primers 5'-CAGCTTGCATATGGCCGAAGAGCTGCTTTTGG-3' and 5'-GACCTCGAGTCGGTAATGCAGGTCATACTTCC-3') coding for Ala¹⁹-Arg¹¹⁴ of the rat CRF_2(a) receptor was inserted into pET-21a (Novagen) by using NdeI and XhoI restriction sites.

The authenticity of the resulting recombinant expression vectors was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.

Expression in E. coli and isolation of inclusion bodies
E. coli BL21(DE3) (Novagen) was transformed with the respective plasmids and grown in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/mL). For expression, 1 L LB medium was inoculated with 15 to 50 mL overnight culture and grown at 37°C to an optical density of OD_600nm = 0.5 to 0.7. Expression of the proteins was induced with 1 mM IPTG for 3.0 to 3.5 h at 37°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, and the cell pellets were resuspended in 20 mM Tris, 2% (v/v) Triton, and protease inhibitor cocktail (EDTA-free at pH 8; 15 mL/pellet from 1 L cell culture). The cells were disrupted by high-pressure dispersion and subjected to lysis, and the inclusion bodies were collected and stored at –20°C.

The sequences of the expressed proteins are shown in Figure 1.

Renaturation and purification
The inclusion body pellet was solubilized in denaturation buffer (5 M guanidinium hydrochloride [GuHCl], 20 mM Tris at pH 7.5) by shaking and sonication. The proteins were purified by immobilized-metal affinity chromatography by using a chelating Sepharose FF column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB) with immobilized Ni²⁺ ions (loading and washing buffer: 5 M GuHCl, 20 mM Tris at pH 7.5, elution buffer: 5 M GuHCl, 20 mM Tris, 0.5 M imidazole at pH 7.5). Following purification, the proteins were reduced by addition of dithiothreitol (DTT; 100 mM, 1 to 2 mg protein/mL, room temperature for 2 h). After reduction of the proteins, DTT and Ni²⁺ ions were removed by dialysis against denaturation buffer (pH 3.0) at 10°C. After readjusting the pH to 7.5, renaturation was achieved by dialysis against 0.5 M L-arginine, 100 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM reduced glutathione (GSH), 1 mM oxidized glutathione (pH 7.5), and 0.5 to 0.7 mg protein/mL for 3 d at 10°C. After renaturation, a final dialysis step against 10% (v/v) glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, and 20 mM Tris (pH 6.5) overnight at 10°C was accomplished, and insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. The refolded proteins were purified by reversed phase (RP)–HPLC by using a Vydac C4 column (10 x 250 mm, 5-µm particle size, 300 Å pore size, number 214TP510), run in 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid in water with increasing concentrations of acetonitrile (ACN) as mobile phase, and lyophilized.

Peptides
Astressin was purchased from Bachem AG. [¹²⁵I-Tyr⁰]-urocortin 1 (2200 Ci/mmole) was obtained from Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH. Other peptides were synthesized following the procedure described in reference (Beyermann et al. 2000).

Disulfide pattern analysis
Disulfide pattern analysis of all CRF receptor NTs was carried out by standard procedures of enzymatic digestion using trypsin, chymotrypsin, or Glu-C followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization (MALDI)–MS.

N-(His)₆-CRF_2(a) receptor NT
Before analyzing the disulfide pattern in N-(His)₆-CRF_2(a) receptor NT, the protein was treated with 1.8 M hydroxylamine (Bornstei and Balian 1970) and incubated for 5 h at 45°C for cleavage of the Asn⁶⁹-Gly⁷⁰ and the Asn⁸⁶-Gly⁸⁷ peptide bonds. Following cleavage, the protein was purified by RP-HPLC (see Renaturation and Purification).

CRF_2(a)-C-(His)₆ receptor NT
For analyzing the disulfide pattern of CRF_2(a)-C-(His)₆ receptor NT, free cysteines were blocked by alkylation with IAA (phosphate buffer at pH 5.7, 25 µM protein, 5 mg/mL IAA, 2 M GuHCl, overnight at 37°C) or cyanylation with CDAP (phosphate buffer at pH 5.7, 25 µM protein, 0.25 mM CDAP, 1 mM EDTA, overnight at 40°C). Removal of excess reactants was performed by dialysis against 2 M GuHCl, 20 mM Tris, and 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.5).

MALDI-MS measurements were performed on a Voyager-DE STR BioSpectrometry Workstation MALDI–time of flight (TOF) mass spectrometer (Perseptive Biosystems, Inc.). As matrices for analyses of peptides and proteins, -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and sinapinic acid, respectively, were used. The program SearchXLinks (www.caesar.de/searchxlinks/) was used to analyze the mass spectra of protein digests with regard to the presence of disulfide-linked fragments.

Ligand binding assay: SPA
The competitive binding assays were performed in triplicates in 2.0-mL colorless reaction tubes (Biozym Diagnostik GmbH) at room temperature by using a PVT copper His-tag SPA bead suspension (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH) in assay buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The following reagents, diluted in assay buffer, were added in the order: 100 µL of unlabeled peptide with increasing peptide concentrations or buffer, 75 µL [¹²⁵I-Tyr⁰]-urocortin (120 pM final concentration), and 75 µL of the respective CRF_2(a) receptor NT (20 ng/tube). After incubation of the reaction mixture for 2 h, 50 µL of 10 mg/mL bead suspension (500 µg beads/tube) were added. The final reaction mixture was shaken and then incubated for 4 h. Finally, the tubes were counted in a Wallac 1410 set up in a ³H cpm-mode (SPA-cpm). Total binding observed and normalized at 100 pM; final concentration of tracer was ~13,000 SPA-cpm for both CRF_2(a) receptor NT, with a nonspecific signal of ~3000 SPA-cpm determined in the presence of unlabeled 1 µM astressin. Binding data were analyzed by using the GraphPad Prism software.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Prof. U.B. Kaupp for the gift of the CRF_2(a) receptor cDNAs and G. Vogelreiter for technical assistance. This project was supported by the Sonderforschungbereich (SFB) 449.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

	References

TOP Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Bazarsuren, A., Grauschopf, U., Wozny, M., Reusch, D., Hoffmann, E., Schaefer, W., Panzner, S., and Rudolph, R. 2002. In vitro folding, functional characterization, and disulfide pattern of the extracellular domain of human GLP-1 receptor. Biophys. Chem. 96: 305–318.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beyermann, M., Rothemund, S., Heinrich, N., Fechner, K., Furkert, J., Dathe, M., Winter, R., Krause, E., and Bienert, M. 2000. A role for a helical connector between two receptor binding sites of a long-chain peptide hormone. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 5702–5709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bornhorst, J.A. and Falke, J.J. 2000. Purification of proteins using polyhistidine affinity tags. Methods Enzymol. 326: 245–254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bornstei, P. and Balian, G. 1970. Specific nonenzymatic cleavage of bovine ribonuclease with hydroxylamine. J. Biol. Chem. 245: 4854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buchner, J. and Rudolph, R. 1991. Renaturation, purification and characterization of recombinant Fab-fragments produced in Escherichia coli. BioTechnology 9: 157–162.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chang, C.P., Pearse, R.V., O’Connell, S., and Rosenfeld, M.G. 1993. Identification of A 7 transmembrane helix receptor for corticotropin-releasing factor and sauvagine in mammalian brain. Neuron 11: 1187–1195.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen, R.P., Lewis, K.A., Perrin, M.H., and Vale, W.W. 1993. Expression cloning of a human corticotropin-releasing-factor receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 8967–8971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cserzo, M., Wallin, E., Simon, I., von Heijne, G., and Elofsson, A. 1997. Prediction of transmembrane -helices in prokaryotic membrane proteins: The dense alignment surface method. Protein Eng. 10: 673–676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glocker, M.O., Arbogast, B., and Deinzer, M.L. 1995. Characterization of disulfide linkages and disulfide bond scrambling in recombinant human macrophage-colony-stimulating factor by fast-atom-bombardment mass-spectrometry of enzymatic digests. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spektrom. 6: 638–643.[CrossRef]

Grauschopf, U., Lilie, H., Honold, K., Wozny, M., Reusch, D., Esswein, A., Schafer, W., Rucknagel, K.P., and Rudolph, R. 2000. The N-terminal fragment of human parathyroid hormone receptor 1 constitutes a hormone binding domain and reveals a distinct disulfide pattern. Biochemistry 39: 8878–8887.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hofmann, B.A., Sydow, S., Jahn, O., Van Werven, L., Liepold, T., Eckart, K., and Spiess, J. 2001. Functional and protein chemical characterization of the N-terminal domain of the rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1. Protein Sci. 10: 2050–2062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lilie, H., Schwarz, E., and Rudolph, R. 1998. Advances in refolding of proteins produced in E. coli. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9: 497–501.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lovenberg, T.W., Liaw, C.W., Grigoriadis, D.E., Clevenger, W., Chalmers, D.T., Desouza, E.B., and Oltersdorf, T. 1995. Cloning and characterization of a functionally distinct corticotropin-releasing factor-receptor subtype from rat-brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 836–840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 10: 1–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Perrin, M.H., Fischer, W.H., Kunitake, K.S., Craig, A.G., Koerber, S.C., Cervini, L.A., Rivier, J.E., Groppe, J.C., Greenwald, J., Nielsen, S.M., et al. 2001. Expression, purification, and characterization of a soluble form of the first extracellular domain of the human type 1 corticotropin releasing factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 31528–31534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Perrin, M.H., DiGruccio, M.R., Koerber, S.C., Rivier, J.E., Kunitake, K.S., Bain, D.L., Fischer, W.H., and Vale, W.W. 2003. A soluble form of the first extracellular domain of mouse type 2 corticotropin-releasing factor receptor reveals differential ligand specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 15595–15600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Persson, B. and Argos, P. 1996. Topology prediction of membrane proteins. Protein Sci. 5: 363–371.[Abstract]

Qi, L.J., Leung, A.T., Xiong, Y.T., Marx, K.A., and Abousamra, A.B. 1997. Extracellular cysteines of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor are critical for ligand interaction. Biochemistry 36: 12442–12448.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reczko, M., Staub, E., Fiziev, P., and Hatzigeorgiou, A. 2002. Algorithms in bioinformatics. Algorithms in bioinformatics (eds. R. Guigo and D. Gusfield), pp. 60–67. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

Rudolph, R. and Lilie, H. 1996. In vitro folding of inclusion body proteins. FASEB J. 10: 49–56.[Abstract]

Sachdev, D. and Chirgwin, J.M. 2000. Fusions to maltose-binding protein: Control of folding and solubility in protein purification. 326: 312–321.

Saxena, V.P. and Wetlaufer, D.B. 1970. Formation of three-dimensional structure in proteins, 1: Rapid nonenzymic reactivation of reduced lysozyme. Biochemistry 9: 5015–5023.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sechi, S. and Chait, B.T. 1998. Modification of cysteine residues by alkylation: A tool in peptide mapping and protein identification. Anal. Chem. 70: 5150–5158.[Medline]

Skerra, A. and Schmidt, T.G.M. 2000. Use of the Strep-tag and streptavidin for detection and purification of recombinant proteins. 326: 271–304.

Sklenar, V., Piotto, M., Leppik, R., and Saudek, V. 1993. Gradient-tailored water suppression for H-1-N-15 Hsqc experiments optimized to retain full sensitivity. J. Magn. Res. A 102: 241–245.[CrossRef]

Smith, D.B. 2000. Generating fusions to glutathione S-transferase for protein studies. Applications of chimeric genes and hybrid proteins: Methods in enzymology 326: 254–270.[CrossRef]

Smyth, D.R., Mrozkiewicz, M.K., McGrath, W.J., Listwan, P., and Kobe, B. 2003. Crystal structures of fusion proteins with large-affinity tags. Protein Sci. 12: 1313–1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stenzel, P., Kesterson, R., Yeung, W., Cone, R.D., Rittenberg, M.B., and Stenzelpoore, M.P. 1995. Identification of a novel murine receptor for cortico-tropin-releasing hormone expressed in the heart. Mol. Endocrinol. 9: 637–645.[Abstract]

Vale, W., Spiess, J., Rivier, C., and Rivier, J. 1981. Characterization of A 41-residue ovine hypothalamic peptide that stimulates secretion of corticotropin and -endorphin. Science 213: 1394–1397.[Free Full Text]

Vita, N., Laurent, P., Lefort, S., Chalon, P., Lelias, J.M., Kaghad, M., Lefur, G., Caput, D., and Ferrara, P. 1993. Primary structure and functional expression of mouse pituitary and human brain corticotropin-releasing factor receptors. FEBS Lett. 335: 1–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wakselman, M., Guibejampel, E., Raoult, A., and Busse, W.D. 1976. 1-Cyano-4-dimethylamino-pyridinium salts: New water-soluble reagents for cyanylation of protein sulfhydryl groups. J. Chem. Soc. 1: 21–22.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. F. Mesleh, W. A. Shirley, C. E. Heise, N. Ling, R. A. Maki, and R. P. Laura NMR Structural Characterization of a Minimal Peptide Antagonist Bound to the Extracellular Domain of the Corticotropin-releasing Factor1 Receptor J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2007; 282(9): 6338 - 6346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ps.04835904v1 13/9/2470    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klose, J. Articles by Rothemund, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klose, J. Articles by Rothemund, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?