Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Protein Science (2005), 14:2622-2637. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2005 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Xue, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Xue, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Topology characterization of a benzodiazepine-binding {beta}-rich domain of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit

Zhiwen Xu1, Shisong Fang1, Haifeng Shi1, Hoiming Li1, Yiqun Deng1, Yinglei Liao1, Jiun-Ming Wu2, Hui Zheng1, Huaimin Zhu1,3, Hueih-Min Chen2, Shui Ying Tsang1 and Hong Xue1

1 Department of Biochemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China
2 Institute of BioAgricultural Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Reprint requests to: Hong Xue, Department of Biochemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China; e-mail: hxue{at}ust.hk; fax: +(852) 23581552.

(RECEIVED April 29, 2005; FINAL REVISION June 28, 2005; ACCEPTED July 4, 2005)


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 References
 
Structural investigation of GABAA receptors has been limited by difficulties imposed by its trans-membrane-complex nature. In the present study, the topology of a membrane-proximal {beta}-rich (MPB) domain in the C139–L269 segment of the receptor {alpha}1 subunit was probed by mapping the benzodiazepine (BZ)-binding and epitopic sites, as well as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis. Ala-scanning and semiconservative substitutions within this segment revealed the contribution of the phenyl rings of Y160 and Y210, the hydroxy group of S186 and the positive charge on R187 to BZ-binding. FRET with the bound BZ ligand indicated the proximity of Y160, S186, R187, and S206 to the BZ-binding site. On the other hand, epitope-mapping using the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the MPB domain established a clustering of T172, R173, E174, Q196, and T197. Based on the lack of FRET between Trp substitutionally placed at R173 or V198 and bound BZ, this epitope-mapped cluster is located on a separate end of the folded protein from the BZ-binding site. Mutations of the five conserved Cys and Trp residues in the MPB domain gave rise to synergistic and rescuing effects on protein secondary structures and unfolding stability that point to a CCWCW-pentad, reminiscent to the CWC-triad "pin" of immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains, important for the structural maintenance. These findings, together with secondary structure and fold predictions suggest an anti-parallel {beta}-strand topology with resemblance to Ig-like fold, having the BZ-binding and the epitopic residues being clustered at two different ends of the fold.

Keywords: Ala-scanning; circular dichroism; fluorescence spectroscopy; fold recognition; epitope mapping; secondary structure; stability; thermodynamic analysis

Abbreviations: AChBP, acetylcholine-binding protein • BFR, Bod-ipy-FL Ro-1986 • BZ, benzodiazepine • CD, circular dichroism • FA, fluorescence anisotropy • FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer • GABAA, type A {gamma}-aminobutyric acid • GdCl, guanidine hydrochloride • Ig, immunoglobulin • LGIC, ligand-gated ion channel • mAb, monoclonal antibody • MPB, membrane-proximal {beta}-rich

Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.051555205.


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 References
 
Type A {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptors belong to the fast-acting ligand-gated ion channel (LGIC) superfamily that mediates most of the inhibitory synaptic transmissions in the central nervous system (Macdonald and Olsen 1994; Smith and Olsen 1995; Stephenson 1995). They are clinically important drug targets, and several distinct classes of therapeutic agents including BZ tranquilizers, barbiturates, and general anesthetics may regulate their functions allosterically (Sieghart 1995). A pentameric structure has been suggested for these receptors (Nayeem et al. 1994), with the chloride ion channel formed along the vertical axis of subunit interfaces and several distinct ligand binding sites situated in the large N-terminal extracellular region. In particular, the BZ-binding pocket was attributed to the {alpha}/{gamma} subunit interface (Sigel and Buhr 1997). More recently, the homomeric {gamma}2 receptor was found to be positively modulated by BZs, indicating the presence of BZ-binding sites on the homo-oligomers (Martinez-Torres and Miledi 2004).

While experimental determination of GABAA receptor structure is hindered by the transmembrane nature of the protein, 3D structure prediction by homology modeling is also constrained by the lack of a suitable structural template. Among proteins with known 3D structures, although acetylcholine-binding protein (AChBP) shows the highest sequence similarity to the extracellular domain of LGIC receptors, its identity with the ligand-binding domain of the GABAA receptor is only 18% (Brejc et al. 2001; Cromer et al. 2002). Nonetheless, fold-recognition algorithms—by which fold types can be predicted even for proteins with little sequence similarities to known structures—have been formulated, and fold recognition may provide useful structural information on the GABAA receptor protein that can be tested experimentally.

Experimental investigations of GABAA receptor structures have been facilitated by the overexpression of recombinant receptor domains (Xue et al. 1998; Shi et al. 2002, 2003). On this basis, the N-terminal region of GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit was shown to consist of two {beta}-rich domains formed by residues Q1–E138 and C139–L269, respectively (Shi et al. 2002). Since the C139–L269 segment harboring the MPB domain (Fig. 1AGo) formed ordered tertiary and rosette-like quaternary structures (Xue et al. 1999, 2000; Hang et al. 2000), and displayed a greater BZ-binding affinity than the neighboring Q1–E138 segment, it was identified to be both structurally and functionally a highly important domain (Shi et al. 2002).




View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) Schematic representation of human GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit. The four putative transmembrane regions (M1–M4) are designated as in Swiss-Prot, and members of the CCWCW-pentad are shown on top of the subunit. Primary sequence is shown for the Ala-scanned P154–L219 segment of the MPB domain, and numbering is based on the mature sequence. Residues contributing to BZ-binding are boxed, with those previously reported (Amin et al. 1997; Buhr et al. 1997; Hang et al. 2000) shown in orange, and those identified in the present study, in red. Residues contributing to protein secondary structural integrity are underlined. Residues subjected to Trp-substitutions are marked by "w," with those showing significant FRET with the bound BZ highlighted in green. Residues recognized by both mAbs 3E2 and 4F10 are highlighted by dark blue dots, and those recognized by mAb 3E2-only, by light blue dots. Predicted {beta}-strands (orange bar) and loops (green line) are indicated below the amino acid sequence. (B) Topological diagram of P154–L219 segment. The predicted {beta}-strands indicated in A are arranged in an up-and-down anti-parallel {beta}-strand topology. Residues that contributed to BZ-binding of the MPB domain are circled in red. Residues that upon Trp-substitution showed significant FRET with bound BZ are highlighted in green. Residues reactive toward mAbs 3E2 or 4F10 are circled in blue. The end of the {beta}-strands housing the BZ-binding site is shown with a yellow background, and the other end, recognized by the mAbs shown with a blue background. (C) Conservation of Cys and Trp residues in different aligned GABAA receptor subunits. Conserved CW residues are boxed (solid line); semi-conserved ones are boxed (dashed line).

 
To gain insight into this MPB domain, in the present study protein secondary structure and fold predictions have been combined with experimental approaches based on the characterization of point mutants by means of circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, fluorescence anisotropy (FA) measurement, FRET analysis, and mapping of solvent-accessible epitopic sites with mAbs against the MPB domain. The contributions of the five conserved Cys and Trp in this receptor domain to structural stability of a postulated Ig-like fold were also investigated.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 References
 
Residues important to protein structure or BZ-binding
To identify residues important to protein structure or BZ-binding, the 62 non-Ala residues in P154–L219 segment (Fig. 1AGo) were Ala-substituted individually, and the resultant mutants were compared to the wild-type MPB domain with respect to their secondary structures and BZ-binding affinity.

Based on the far-UV CD spectra (Fig. 2AGo) and the CDPro analysis package (Sreerama and Woody 2000), the wild type protein exhibited 18.5% {alpha}-helix, 31.7% {beta}-sheet, 22.3% {beta}-turn, and 27.4% others, including random structures (Table 1Go). For the mutant proteins, Ala-substitution of each of residues K156, Y160, E166, V167, V179, G185, Q190, L194, D199, Q204, T207, F217, and L219 gave rise to significant changes in secondary structures compared to the wild type (Table 1Go; Fig. 2AGo), pointing to the importance of these residues to the secondary structural maintenance. A small structural change encountered earlier upon Ala-substitution of Y210 (Hang et al. 2000) was found not to be significant when the improved computational programs (Sreerama and Woody 2000) of the present study were used (Table 2Go). It might be noted that within the Ala-scanned P154–L219 segment, secondary structural prediction showed mainly the occurrence of {beta}-strands and loops, with little {alpha}-helix (Fig. 1AGo).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects exerted by Ala-substitutions of a three-residue cluster. (A) CD spectra of the wild-type MPB domain and its G185A, S186A, and R187A mutants. (B) Saturation anisotropy curves and their Scatchard transformations (inset) for BFR binding to the MPB domain, or the longer Q1–L269 domain (C). In both instances: wild type ({blacksquare}); G185A ({square}); S186A ({circ}); R187A ({triangleup}).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Ala-substitutions leading to alterations in protein structure
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mutational effects on protein secondary structure and BZ-binding
 
Toward the binding of the fluorescent BZ ligand Bodi-py-FL Ro-1986 (BFR), Ala-substitution of each of the residues—G185, S186, R187, and F217—reduced binding affinities to about half that of the wild type (Table 2Go; Fig. 2BGo), and comparable to previously reported affinities of the Y160A, T207A, and Y210A mutants (Hang et al. 2000). Of these seven Ala-substitutions, because Y160A, G185A, T207A, and F217A induced protein structural changes, their effects on BZ-binding might be a secondary consequence of such changes. In contrast, the S186A, R187A, and Y210A mutations, insofar that they did not induce any significant secondary structural change (Table 2Go; Fig. 2AGo), evidently made a more direct contribution to BZ-binding. These results confirmed the importance of Y210 to BZ-binding first observed in electrophysiological studies (Amin et al. 1997; Buhr et al. 1997), and indicated in addition the involvement of S186 and R187 in BZ-binding.

The Q1–L269 segment, which spans the N-terminal {beta}-rich domain Q1–E138 and MPB domain as delineated previously (Shi et al. 2002), exhibited a Kd of 1.6 µM toward BFR (Table 2Go). The higher binding affinity of the larger domain, compared to the Kd of 4.9 µM exhibited by the MPB domain, likely reflected extra binding contributions made by residues present in Q1–E138 (Fig. 1AGo). When Ala-substitutions were performed at the three consecutive residues G185–R187, each of the G185A, S186A, and R187A mutants displayed a five- to sixfold decrease in BZ-binding affinity (Fig. 2CGo). As in the case for the MPB domain, only G185A, but not S186A or R187A, caused significant changes in secondary structures in the longer domain (Table 2Go). These findings indicate that the structural perturbation induced by G185A, as well as decreased BZ-binding induced by S186A and R187A, were observable with both the longer and the shorter receptor domains. They therefore represented attributes of stable configurations in this portion of the receptor protein that did not greatly vary with the length of the polypeptide.

Side-chain contributions to BZ-binding
To better define the nature of the amino acid side-chain contributions to BZ-binding in the MPB domain, various Ala-substituted residues were further subjected to semi-conservative substitutions.

In contrast to Ala-substitution of S186, which decreased BZ-binding affinity without changing secondary structures, Thr-substitution of this residue did not alter either property (Table 2Go), demonstrating thereby the important role played by the hydroxy group at residue 186 in BZ-binding. When the residue R187 was subjected to substitution by Lys, Trp, or Glu, none of the substitutions brought about any significant structural change, and only R187E yielded a reduced binding affinity comparable to that of R187A (Table 2Go). Thus, the appearance of a negative charge at this position was not well tolerated with respect to BZ-binding. Unlike G185A, which affected both secondary structures and BZ-binding, the G185P mutation did not significantly alter either parameter (Table 2Go), suggesting that conformational constraints at residue 185 might be important to protein folding; Gly and Pro are known to share a propensity to destabilize {alpha}-helices and favor {beta}-turns in proteins (Krystek et al. 1995).

Mutating Y160 to Phe, Thr or Trp gave rise to Kd for BFR of 5.7 µM, 8.0 µM, or 8.2 µM, respectively, compared to 4.9 µM for the wild type (Table 2Go). Secondary structural change was displayed by Y160T, where the aromatic Tyr was replaced by hydrophilic Thr but not by Y160F or Y160W, where aromaticity was conserved. That Y160W gave rise to a decreased binding affinity unaccompanied by extensive secondary structural change points to a direct contribution by Y160 to BZ-binding, despite the occurrence of structural disruption when Y160 was replaced by Ala. Moreover, the smaller increase in Kd shown by Y160F compared to Y160T or Y160W indicates the importance of the phenyl ring to the contribution by Y160 toward BZ-binding. For residue T207, its semiconservative substitution by Ser, preserving a hydroxy group in the side chain, failed to alter either protein structure or BZ-binding affinity, in contrast to the evident changes in both properties when it was replaced by Ala (Table 2Go). Therefore a side-chain hydroxy at this position is clearly required for protein structure maintenance and BZ-binding. The Y210F mutant, which lost the hydroxy group but not the aromatic ring in the side chain, showed a Kd value and secondary structural contents close to the wild type. By comparison, when Y210 was mutated to Thr, retaining the hydroxy group but not the phenyl ring, Kd was significantly increased from 4.9 µM to 9.9 µM, still unaccompanied by substantial structural changes (Table 2Go). Therefore the phenyl ring is important at residue 210 for BZ-binding. When Y210 was substituted by Trp, a reduction in binding affinity was accompanied by considerable secondary structural changes. Thus the placement of a bulky indole ring at this position disrupted the protein fold.

The van’t Hoff plot of ln Ka versus 1/T for BFR binding to the MPB domain was close to linear (Fig. 3Go), yielding {Delta}H = – 20.55 kJ mol–1 and {Delta}S = 29.52 J mol–1 K–1 over the temperature range 12°–35°C. The linearity suggests that the ligand binding mechanisms were largely uniform over these temperatures, likely involving the same set of amino acid side chains on the receptor protein.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Thermodynamics of BFR binding to MPB domain. Saturation anisotropy curves were obtained for BFR binding to MPB domain at different temperatures: 285.0 K ({square}); 291.2 K (•); 298.0 K ({triangleup}); 303.4 K ({blacktriangledown}); 308.3 K ({diamond}). Inset shows linear van’t Hoff plot for the binding.

 
FRET and epitope mapping
The relative distances between putative loops and the BZ-binding site could be determined by measuring FRET from Trp probes placed in these loops to the fluorescent BZ ligand BFR. Since the efficiency of FRET is inversely related to the sixth power of the distance R between donor and acceptor (Stryer 1978), significant FRET represents a reliable indicator for proximity, at approximately R < 2 R0 (Robert 1996). Figure 1AGo shows the positions of Trp-substitutions in putative loops, at residues where the substitution had been determined not to disturb secondary structures (Table 2Go). The Forster distances R0 between these Trp-substituted mutants and BFR, calculated from Equation 6 as given in Materials and Methods, were 23.9 – 24.0 Å, close to the value of 24.2 Å for the wild-type MPB domain and BFR. This gives an estimate for R to be < 48 Å. Of the six Trp-substituted mutants constructed, Y160W, S186W, R187W, and S206W yielded FRET to BFR that exceeded the wild-type protein with respect to the FRET index INT280/INT340 (Fig. 4Go), suggesting the proximity of these four residues to the bound BFR. In contrast, the lack of significant FRET enhancement in R173W and V198W point to the greater distances between the BFR and these positions in the polypeptide.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Spatial proximity of different amino acid residues to the bound BFR as measured by FRET. The variations of the INT280/INT340 index for FRET with protein concentrations are shown for one run of measurements in the main figure: wild type ({blacksquare}); Y160W ({square}); R173W ({circ}); S186W ({triangleup}); R187W ({triangledown}); V198W ({diamond}); S206W ({hexa1}). The saturation curves were each obtained by nonlinear fitting of the data to a hyperbolic model. (Inset) The bars represent the saturation index values (mean ± S.E.) averaged from at least three independent measurements of different batches of protein samples. * indicates mutant values statistically different (p < 0.05) from the wild type (WT) in the t test.

 
An antibody to a protein antigen may recognize different amino acids from more than one segment of the primary sequence, which in turn furnishes evidence for the physical proximity between these different amino acids (Benjamin and Perdue 1996). In the present study, the mAbs 3E2 and 4F10 raised against the MPB domain specifically recognized the C139–L269 segment of the {alpha}1 subunit, but not the bovine serum albumin or the recombinant Q1–G219 fragment of the GABAA receptor {beta}2 subunit (Fig. 5AGo). When mAb 3E2 was used as primary antibody in the ELISA assay against the MPB domain and its Ala-substituted mutant forms, the assay readings yielded by T172A, R173A, E174A, Q196A, and T197A were reduced to around 40%, 40%, 20%, 5%, and 40% of wild type, respectively (Fig. 5BGo). By comparison, the Ala-mutants S159A, Y162A, T163A, R164A, E170A, R177A, E183A, D184A, S186A, R187A, N189A, D192A, S206A, E209A, and Y210A did not depart greatly from the wild type. Since all of the Ala-substitutions compared did not affect the secondary structures (Table 1Go), these results suggest that T172, R173, E174, Q196, and T197 represented epitopic residues recognized by mAb 3E2. By the same token, E174, Q196, and T197 were identified to be epitopic residues recognized by mAb 4F10 (Fig. 5CGo). Therefore, each of these two mAbs recognizes simultaneously E174 and Q196–T197. These results indicate that E174 is spatially situated close to Q196–T197, and all three of them are exposed to solvent.




View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of mutations on reactivity with mAbs. (A) Specificity of mAbs 3E2 and 4F10 tested by Western blotting performed as described in Materials and Methods using equal amounts of proteins (20 µg) per lane. (Lane 1) Protein markers; (lane 2) C139-L269 of GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit (MPB domain); (lane 3) Q1-G219 of GABAA receptor {beta}2 subunit; (lane 4) bovine serum albumin. Left panel shows Comassie blue stained gel; middle and right panels show that 3E2 and 4F10 mediated staining of protein band only in lane 2 by sheep-anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. (B) Indirect ELISA performed with mAb 3E2 in microtiter wells coated with various proteins: WT, wild-type MPB domain; 159, 162, etc., mutant Ala-substituted at residue-159, 162, etc.; C1, bovine serum albumin; C2, Q1-G219 of GABAA receptor {beta}2 subunit. Both C1 and C2 served as negative controls. Results obtained from two separate tests carried out in triplicates were normalized, and shown as percent absorbance relative to WT (mean ± S.E.). (C) Same as B except that mAb 4F10 was used.

 
Synergistic and rescuing effects of mutations at conserved Cys and Trp
Inspection of aligned GABAA receptor sequences (Fig. 1CGo) reveals that the five Cys and Trp residues in the C139–L269 segment are all conserved between the {alpha} and the {gamma} subunits of GABAA receptor. In the {beta} subunits, four of them are conserved, while one Cys is replaced semi-conservatively by Ser. To define the roles of these well-conserved residues in the MPB domain, Cys was mutagenized to Ala, and Trp to Tyr, in all possible combinations.

The secondary structure contents of the 31 resultant mutants were estimated based on far-UV CD spectra (Fig. 6AGo) and the CDPro analysis package (Sreerama and Woody 2000). To facilitate comparison of secondary structural changes between each Cys–Trp mutant and the wild type, the {sigma} index described in Equation 1 in Materials and Methods was used to express the aggregate change in a mutant with respect to {alpha}-helix, {beta}-strands, turns, and random structures. On this basis, the five single-substitution mutants, namely C139A, C153A, C234A, W171Y, and W246Y, were found to display relatively minor {sigma} , while the triple mutant C139A/C234A/W171Y yielded the highest {sigma} among the 31 mutants (Table 3Go; Fig. 6BGo). Although significant changes in {sigma} were encountered with all the quadruple and quintuple mutants (Table 3Go), interestingly their {sigma} values were smaller than those of the double mutants C139A/C234A and C139A/W171Y. The far greater {sigma} of these two double mutants as well as C234A/W246Y (Fig. 6BGo, black columns) than those arising from their constituent single mutations established the occurrence of striking synergism between the constituent point mutations within the double mutants. At the same time, the greater {sigma} of C139A/C234A and C139A/W171Y compared to triple mutants obtained by a further mutation at either C153 or W246 (Fig. 6BGo, shaded columns) clearly signaled the operation of rescue effects within the triple mutants. Similarly a rescue effect was evident when a third mutation, C153A, was added to the double mutation C234A/W246Y (Fig. 6BGo). Both the synergism and the rescue effects observed in these various instances entailed largely a shift between {alpha}-helix and {beta}-strands, with only minor alterations with respect to percent turns and percent random structures.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects due to mutations of Cys and Trp residues on protein secondary structures. (A) CD spectra of wild-type MPB domain and representative mutants. (B) Synergistic and rescue effects. X-axis shows the various proteins examined, where I–V represent single mutations as indicated. Multiple mutations are shown in terms of their constituent single mutations; e.g., (I, III) represents the double mutations of C139A/C234A. (Top panel) Percent {alpha}-helix (percent {alpha}, gray) or percent {beta}-strand (percent {beta}, clear) of the indicated wild type or mutant protein; (middle panel) percent turns (percent t, gray) or percent random structures (percent r, clear); (bottom panel) {sigma} , where occurrence of synergistic effects are highlighted in black and rescue effects are highlighted by shading.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mutations of the conserved Cys and Trp
 
When BZ-binding by each of the Cys–Trp mutants was compared to the wild type, none of the single mutants showed a significant change in Kd (Table 3Go). While significant changes in Kd were exhibited by most of the multiple mutants, these same mutants were also characterized by considerable changes in protein secondary structures (Table 3Go), suggesting that the decreased binding activity observed could be the result of structural perturbations.

With regard to protein stability, since both wild-type and mutant MPB domain were precipitated by low but not high concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride (GdCl), their resistance against this denaturant could be measured at [GdCl > 2.5 M (Fig. 7Go). Contributions by disulphide bonds were evident in GdCl-induced denaturation of the MPB domain in the absence of reducing agents, resulting in relatively noncooperative unfolding (Shi et al. 2002). Therefore, protein denaturation experiments were performed in the presence of 2 mM DTT to minimize such contributions. The denaturation curves were monitored either by fluorescence or, in cases where fluorescence intensity was greatly diminished by mutational depletion of Trp, by CD measurements.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of mutations at Cys and Trp residues on protein stability. Denaturation curves were monitored either by fluorescence emission wavelength upon excitation at 295 nm (A,B), or by CD molar ellipticity at 222 nm (C). {Delta}({Delta}G) (kcal mol–1), the difference in free energy of denaturation between mutant and wild type, is shown in parentheses. (D) Unfolding rates of W171Y and wild type in the presence of different GdCl concentrations.

 
Among the five single Cys–Trp mutants, the GdCl denaturation curves of C139A, C234A, W171Y, and—to a less extent—W246Y, were left-shifted relative to the wild type and elevated susceptibility to denaturation (Fig. 7A,CGo). The curve of C153A remained close to that of the wild type. The {Delta}({Delta}G), the difference in the free energy of denaturation between a mutant and the wild type, is a measure of the change in protein stability brought about by the mutation, and could be estimated by means of Equation 8 in Materials and Methods (Pace 1990). The {Delta}({Delta}G)s for the single mutants were –1.03 kcal mol–1 for C153A, –1.45 kcal mol–1 for C234A, –1.58 kcal mol–1 for W246Y, –2.42 kcal mol–1 for C139A, and –2.73 kcal mol–1 for W171Y. Thus all the single mutants displayed decreased stability, particularly W171Y, which showed the largest change. When measured by fluorescence stopped-flow spectroscopy, W171Y also showed faster unfolding than wild type (Fig. 7DGo).

Among the multiple substitutions, C139A/C153A yielded a [D]0.5 of 4.6 M GdCl (Fig. 7BGo), and a calculated {Delta}({Delta}G) of –0.83 kcal mol–1. Thus, in reference to C139A ([D]0.5 = 3.7 M and {Delta}({Delta}G) = –2.42 kcal mol–1), the further Ala-substitution of C153 caused a rescue effect on protein stability, to result in a much higher [D]0.5 and smaller {Delta}({Delta}G). Comparably, the introduction of an additional C153A mutation rescued much of the instability of W171Y (Fig. 7CGo). In contrast, no extensive rescue effect was observed between C139A and C139A/C234A (Fig. 7BGo). The triple mutant C139A/C153A/C234A displayed a dramatically reduced [D]0.5 of 3.0 M GdCl and a {Delta}({Delta}G) of –2.96 kcal mol–1 (Fig. 7BGo). This departed sharply from the {sigma} results, where adding C153A to the double mutant C139A/C234A brought about rescue effects (Fig. 6BGo). The {Delta}({Delta}G) of the quintuple mutant 3CA2WY, where all three Cys were replaced by Ala and both Trp by Tyr, was estimated to be –4.27 kcal mol–1 (Fig. 7CGo), indicative of extreme instability and establishing clearly the importance of the five conserved Cys and Trp residues to protein stability.

Fold-recognition analysis
Previously, the application of both TOPITS (Rost 1995) and UCLA-DOE (Fischer and Eisenberg 1996) to overlapping fragments of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit suggested {beta}-rich structures for the N-terminal two-thirds of the full-length receptor protein (Xue et al. 1999). In Figure 8Go, the structures yielding higher Z-scores as a measure of goodness of fit were subgrouped into different structural folds based on SCOP classification (Hubbard et al. 1999). The Z-scores were relatively low (<3 for TOPITS and <3.5 for UCLA-DOE) even for the top structures, indicating that the folding of the MPB domain does not conform well to elucidated structures. Both TOPITS (Fig. 8AGo) and UCLA-DOE (Fig. 8BGo), however, suggested that the Ig-like {beta}-sandwich fold would furnish a useful initial approximation for the domain. When the C139–L269 sequence and five homologous sequences of GABAA receptor {alpha}6, {beta}4, and {delta} subunits and the glycine receptor {alpha}3 and {beta} subunits were threaded against template structures using the ProFIT fold-recognition program (Domingues et al. 1999), the top-ranking fold was Ig-like {beta}-sandwich (Table 4Go), in agreement with the TOPITS and UCLA-DOE results.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Fold recognition. The 20 best-fitting structures identified by TOPITS (A) or the 15 best-fitting structures identified by UCLA-DOE (B) in terms of similarity to overlapping 120-residue fragments of GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit, with a scanning interval of ten residues, are grouped into structural folds based on SCOP classification. Structure folds represented in A include A, Ig-like {beta}-sandwich; B, viral coat and capsid proteins; C, trypsin-like serine proteases; D, supersandwich; E, single-stranded left-handed {beta}-helix; F, segmented RNA-genome viruses’ proteins; G, reductase/elongation factor common domain; H, OB-fold; I, near-membrane domain of membrane proteins; J, lipocalins; K, glycosyl-asparaginase; L, galactose-binding domain-like; M, double-stranded {beta}-helix; N, cupredoxins; O, conA-like lectins/glucanases; P, common fold of diphtheria toxin/transcription factors/cytochrome f; Q, colipase binding domain-like; R, C2 domain-like; S, {beta}-trefoil; T, {beta}-prism I; U, {beta}-clip; V, barrel-sandwich hybrid; W, 7-bladed {beta}-propeller; X, 6-bladed {beta}-propeller. Structural folds represented in B include A, Ig-like {beta}-sandwich; B, viral coat and capsid proteins; C, trypsin-like serine proteases; D, streptavidin-like; E, SH3-like barrel; F, segmented RNA-genome viruses’ proteins; G, reductase/elongation factor common domain; H, prealbumin-like; I, PH domain-like; J, OB-fold; K, lipocalins; L, glycosyl-asparaginase; M, galactose-binding domain-like;N,conA-likelectins/glucanases; O, commonfold of diphtheria toxin/transcription factors/cytochrome f; P, colipase binding domain-like; Q, {beta}-trefoil; R, {beta}-prism II; S, {alpha}-amylase; {beta}-sheet domain; T, acid proteases.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Fold recognition for the MPB domain by ProFIT
 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 References
 
Understanding of the GABAA receptor has been hindered by the lack of structural information. In the present study, experimental characterizations have been combined with protein structure predictions to gain insight into the MPB domain of the {alpha}1 subunit of this receptor.

Key residues for BZ-binding
Ala-scanning of the P154–L219 region revealed a number of residues, underlined in Figure 1AGo, that contribute to the secondary structural integrity of the MPB domain. The structural changes induced by Ala-substitutions at Y160, G185, T207, and F217 were accompanied by significant decreases in BZ-binding affinity (Table 1Go), possibly from a disruption of the BZ-binding site.

Several methods have been used previously to identify BZ-binding site residues. Covalent labeling with reactive ligands identified the involvement of H102 of {alpha}1 subunit in BZ-binding (Wieland et al. 1992). Assisted by site-directed mutagenesis, radioligand binding assays and electrophysiological studies of recombinant {alpha}1{beta}2{gamma}2 GABAA receptors expressed in cell lines or Xenopus laevis oocytes (Smith and Olsen 1995) uncovered the importance of a number of residues to BZ-binding (Sigel and Buhr 1997), including Y160, T207, and Y210 of {alpha}1 subunit and F77 of {gamma}2 subunit. Also, the substituted-Cys accessibility method has been utilized to identify A79 and T81 located at the BZ-binding site of {gamma}2 subunit (Teissere and Czajkowski 2001). However, a limitation common to these methods is that they could not determine whether the observed effect of a particular mutation on ligand binding is directly due to the participation of the mutated residue in the binding process, or an indirect consequence of protein structural alterations caused by the mutation (Cromer et al. 2002).

In the present study, the overexpression of recombinant receptor domains in quantities adequate for both protein structure and BZ-binding studies has made possible a distinction between such direct and indirect effects. Thus the finding that the Y160W, S186A, R187A, and Y210A mutants displayed an increased Kd unaccompanied by significant structural change (Table 2Go) pointed to the involvement of these four residues in the BZ-binding site. The importance of Y160 and Y210 to BZ-binding was first encountered in electrophysiological studies (Amin et al. 1997; Buhr et al. 1997), and confirmation of their key roles in the present study validates the utility of Ala-scanning for detecting binding site residues. Ala-scanning revealed as well the involvement of S186 and R187, located in a predicted loop region (Fig. 1AGo) where no BZ-binding residues had been identified previously. The BZ-binding effects of S186A and R187A were even more pronounced (more than fivefold increase in Kd) in the longer Q1–L269 domain than in the MPB domain (Table 2Go; Fig. 2Go). Besides being invariant with the length of the polypeptide, the BZ-binding mechanism and its underlying amino acid residues also appeared stable over different temperatures, as indicated by the constancy of the {Delta}H and {Delta}S for the ligand binding (Fig. 3Go). This MPB domain therefore provides a robust structure for delineating the roles of amino acid residues in BZ-binding.

The nature of the side-chain requirements of the different key residues for BZ-binding was defined by semi-conservative substitutions. For R187, the results of four separate mutations (Table 2Go) suggested that its positive charge contributed to binding, and the retention of function upon Thr-substitution but not Ala-substitution established a key role for the hydroxy side chain of S186 in BZ-binding, possibly through hydrogen bonding. The phenyl ring was shown to be of foremost importance at both Y160 and Y210, likely on account of its capacity for hydrophobic bonding, in keeping with the hydrophobic nature of BZ ligands. Moreover, the heterocyclic nitrogen and keto-oxygen atoms of BZs present potential sites for hydrogen bonding with receptor. In fact, pharmacophore models for GABAA receptors have been described for hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding with BZs (Zhang et al. 1995) and flavonoids (Huang et al. 2001). In this regard, Y160 and Y210 could furnish hydrophobic sites, and S186, a hydrogen-bonding site.

Thermodynamic analysis showed that the binding of BFR to the wild-type MPB domain fits a linear van’t Hoff plot (Fig. 3Go), yielding constant negative enthalpy change ({Delta}H = –20.55 kJ mol–1) and positive entropy change ({Delta}S = 29.52 J mol–1 K–1) over the temperature range of 12°–35°C. A negative {Delta}H is consistent with the presence of van der Waals interactions and/or hydrogen bonding, and a positive {Delta}S with hydrophobic and/or electrostatic interactions (Ross and Subramanian 1981), which are in accord with the results of site-directed mutagenesis.

The identification of Y160, S186, R187, and Y210 as key residues for BZ-binding is supported by FRET analysis upon placement of Trp as a probe into different positions within the MPB domain. Fluorescence resonance occurred between a Trp residue at positions 160, 186, 187, and 206 and the fluorescent BZ ligand BFR, in contrast to a lack of resonance when Trp was placed at positions 173 and 198. Since the various Trp-substitutions did not elicit significant changes in secondary structures (Table 2Go), the results clearly pointed to the proximity of Y160, S186, and R187 to the bound BZ ligand, which is a prerequisite for the side chain of these residues making a contribution to BZ-binding. The ligand-proximity of S206 is also in keeping with Y210 as a participant in BZ-binding.

Structural role of CCWCW-pentad
When the five conserved Cys and Trp residues—which may be represented as a CCWCW-pentad—in the MPB domain were mutated, the single mutations did not induce significant changes in protein secondary structure contents (Table 3Go), but did cause a decrease in protein stability (Fig. 7Go). With multiple substitutions, striking synergistic and rescue effects with respect to {sigma} as index of secondary structures and {Delta}({Delta}G) as index of protein stability, point to interactions among the five residues. The {sigma} and {Delta}({Delta}G) rescues were not strictly correlated to one another; for example, adding a further C153A mutation to the double mutant C139A/C234A resulted in rescue effects in {sigma} (Fig. 6BGo) but no comparable rescue in GdCl denaturation (Fig. 7BGo). This reflects that whereas {sigma} measured the end-point structural changes, {Delta}({Delta}G) measured only the propensity to unfolding. However, when the factors favoring instability are built up to a high level, the propensity to change and the realized change converged. Thus the very large negative {Delta}({Delta}G) of –4.27 kcal mol–1 of the quintuple mutant 3CA2WY signaled the magnitude of the instability induced by the substitution of all five members of the CCWCW-pentad, and correspondingly the high {sigma} for mutants carrying four or five Cys and Trp mutations clearly gave indication of the loss of structural integrity.

Moreover, since single mutations of Cys or Trp did not affect BZ-binding, these residues are not directly involved in the binding. The decreased BZ-binding affinity of the multiply substituted protein (Table 3Go) was likely an indirect consequence of structural disruption. The crucial importance of the CCWCW-pentad in receptor function is therefore explainable mainly in terms of structure maintenance.

Protein stability is determined by the summation of contributions from many amino acid residues. While additive effects of multiple mutations are not uncommon, synergistic, and rescuing effects could also arise owing to the fine balance between interacting amino acid residues (Chen et al. 2004). In this light, that the C153A or W246Y !mutation could rescue against the {sigma} arising from the double mutations of C139A plus C234A or W171Y (Fig. 6BGo) suggests that the CCWCW-pentad forms an interacting group that exerts concerted influence on the structure of the MPB domain. The rescue of {Delta}({Delta}G) of C139A by C153A toward GdCl denaturation further attested to the opposing structural effects of these two residues. Comparably opposing structural effects were also observed with W171Y and C153A (Fig. 7Go). The exact rescue mechanisms regarding {sigma} and {Delta}({Delta}G) changes, such as the involvement of potential disulfide bonds, remain to be elucidated. Possibly C153 and W246 may stabilize some unfolding intermediates, such that when a synergism between C139A and C234A or W171Y destabilizes the native structure, C153 or W246 could exacerbate the destabilization by favoring the formation of the unfolding intermediates. Under such circumstances, an additional mutation at C153 or W246 may destabilize the intermediates and restore the balance in favor of the native structure. Interestingly, for example, the Ig domain CD2.d1 is known to form partly folded species (Lorch et al. 1999).

Delineation of protein fold topology
In the present study, site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the four residues Y160, S186, R187, and Y210 are important contributors to BZ-binding. FRET analysis also suggests the spatial proximity of Y160, S186, R187, and S206 to the bound BZ ligand (Fig. 4Go). Moreover, co-interaction of T172, R173, E174, Q196, and T197 with the same mAb (Fig. 5BGo) established that these five amino acid residues cluster close to one another. Based on the lack of FRET between Trp mutationally placed at R173 or V198 and bound BZ (Fig. 4Go), this cluster of amino acids are distal to the BZ-binding site.

The secondary structural prediction of the Ala-scanned P154–L219 segment yielded six {beta}-strand segments interspersed with five loop structures (Fig. 1AGo). Designating each {beta}-strand or loop structure by the position of one of its central amino acid residues, the six {beta}-strands are displayed in Figure 1AGo as {beta}K156, {beta}Y169, {beta}V180, {beta}L193, {beta}V203, and {beta}T215, and the five loops as LT163, LE174, LS186, LV198, and LG208.

It is noteworthy that the experimentally identified ligand-proximal and ligand-distal residues are located in the predicted loops. Of the ligand-proximal residues, Y160 is located in LT163, S186 and R187 in LS186, and S206 and Y210 in LG208. On the other hand, of the ligand-distal residues, T172, R173, and E174 are located in LE174, and Q196, T197, and V198 in LV198. This indicates that LT163, LS186, and LG208 are clustered together in a ligand-proximal end of the folded protein, while LE174 and LV198 are clustered together in a ligand-distal end. A simple topology suggested by these results is an anti-parallel arrangement of the six {beta}-strands (Fig. 1BGo).

Protein fold recognition by threading against template 3D structures using TOPITS (Fig. 8AGo), UCLA-DOE (Fig. 8BGo) and ProFIT (Table 4Go), are suggestive of a resemblance between the MPB domain and Ig-like structures. Of note, the crystal structure of AChBP also conforms to a modified Ig-like topology (Brejc et al. 2001). The anti-parallel {beta}-strand topology depicted in Figure 1BGo, based on the experimental observations of the present study, is in agreement with the predicted similarity between the MPB domain and Ig-like fold, an anti-parallel {beta}-sandwich.

The 3D structures of members of the Ig-superfamily are more conserved than their sequences (Halaby and Mornon 1998). While structure-based alignment of 52 Ig-like domain sequences revealed low sequence identity (5%–15%) (Halaby et al. 1999), they share a characteristic topology (Bork et al. 1994). A structural motif identified from this group of proteins consists of an invariant Trp packed against a conserved disulphide bridge to form a "pin," the central core of the protein domain (Lesk and Chothia 1982). This "pin" motif, regarded as a stabilizer of the Ig-fold (Lesk and Chothia 1982; Ioerger et al. 1999), corresponds to the CWC sequence motif with the formula of CX10–17WX26–62C (Smith and Xue 1997). In some Ig-like proteins, an additional Trp residue is located about 10 residues on the C-terminal side of the second Cys of this CWC pin to form a CWCW motif, as exemplified by CX13WX55CX10W in the H-Chain of N9 neuraminidase (Tulip et al. 1992; Protein Data Bank [PDB] code 1NCA [PDB] ) and CX13WX59CX10W in the B-Chain of an anti-idiotope antibody (Bentley et al. 1990; PDB code 1CIC [PDB] ). In the present study, the CCWCW-pentad in the MPB domain was found to exert a profound and concerted influence on protein stability. Its sequence of CX13CX17WX62CX11W comprises a central CX17WX62C similar to the CWC-triad pin of Ig structures, with an upstream extension of CX13- and a downstream extension of -X11W. Thus the similarity between the central portion of the CCWCW-pentad of the MPB domain and the CWC-triad pin of Ig structures extends to both their important structural roles and their sequence formulae.

In conclusion, the present study has identified key residues of the protein BZ-binding site in the MPB domain, and a conserved CCWCW-pentad important to protein stability. The wide array of experimental observations on BZ-binding, FRET, and mAb-recognition gave rise to the suggestion that the alternate interspersing loops between anti-parallel {beta}-strands in the MPB domain are separated into two surface clusters. The BZ-binding amino acid residues are located in the loops at one end of the protein fold, and the cluster of epitopic residues, at the opposite end. This topology, derived by prediction-assisted experimental characterizations, provides a useful basis for an initial delineation of the structure and function of this BZ-binding domain of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit protein.


    Materials and methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and methods
 References
 
Site-directed mutagenesis
Point mutations were incorporated into the cDNA encoding human GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit domains subcloned in the pTrcHis plasmid (Invitrogen) as described (Hang et al. 2000). Mutagenesis was performed with the PCR-based Mutagenesis Kit from Stratagene, and all positive clones were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Protein expression and purification
The GABAA receptor recombinant proteins were expressed and purified as described (Hang et al. 2000; Shi et al. 2002, 2003). Molecular weights and purity of the proteins were estimated using SDS-PAGE. The protein concentrations were determined by OD280 in the presence of 6 M GdCl, with the extinction coefficient {varepsilon}280 calculated from the amino acid composition according to Gill and von Hippel (1989): {varepsilon}280=5690 x W+1280 x Y+120 °C, where W is the number of Trp, Y is the number of Tyr, and C is the number of Cys.

CD spectroscopy and secondary structure prediction
Far-UV CD measurements were performed using a JASCO J-720 spectropolarimeter at room temperature with a 0.1-cm path length cuvette. The protein samples were 0.1 mg/mL in 10 mM glycine, 1 mM EDTA (pH 9.6). The spectra were measured at 0.2 nm resolution and at a scan rate of 100 nm/min. All spectra were averages of at least eight scans. The CD spectra were analyzed with the CDPro package (Sreerama and Woody 2000) for estimation of secondary structure contents.

The summation of secondary structural change, {sigma} , between the Cys–Trp mutant and wild-type MPB domain was calculated according to the following equation:


(1)

where {Delta}Zij is the absolute value of the percentile change in one of the four j parameters ({alpha}-helix, {beta}-strands, turns, and random structures) for mutant i compared to the wild type, and {Delta}Zjmax is the maximum {Delta}Zij encountered in the entire set of 31 mutants.

Predicted secondary structural elements along the entire polypeptide chain of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit were described earlier (Xue et al. 1999). For the Ala-scanned segment P154–L219, these elements, obtained by combined methods of PHD (Rost and Sander 1993), PROF (Rost et al. 1996), and SOMPA (Geourjon and Deleage 1995) are shown in Figure 1AGo.

FA titrations and data analysis
Fluorescence measurements were carried out at room temperature using a Perkin-Elmer model LS50B luminescence spectrometer. Steady-state anisotropy data (A) were calculated based on the following equation:


(2)

where G is the monochromator grating correction factor given by G = IHV/IHH, IVV, and IVH, the parallel and perpendicular polarized fluorescence intensities measured with vertically polarized excitation light; and IHV and IHH, the perpendicular and parallel fluorescence intensities measured with horizontally polarized excitation light (Gidwani et al. 2001). The fraction of fluorophore bound (FB) was determined from anisotropy (A) and quantum yield ratio (Q) using the equation:


(3)

where Afree is the anisotropy of the free fluorophore, and Abound, the anisotropy of the bound fluorophore. Q is given by the ratio of the intensities between bound and free fluorophore. In the saturation experiments, 0.165 µM BFR (Molecular Probes, Inc.) in 10 mM glycine (pH 9.6) was titrated with protein. The anisotropy was measured at excitation wavelength 490 nm and emission wavelength 511 nm, both with a 5-nm slit. The dissociation constant Kd was estimated by nonlinear least-squares fitting of the saturation curve to a single-site binding model (van den Elsen et al. 1997).

Thermodynamic analysis
The enthalpy change {Delta}H describes the temperature dependence of the association equilibrium constant, Ka, based on the linear van’t Hoff relationship:


(4)

where R is the gas constant, and T, the absolute temperature (Horn et al. 2001). The heat capacity change {Delta}Cp was assumed to be insignificant. Ka is the reciprocal of the dissociation constant Kd, obtained from FA measurements at 285.0, 291.2, 298.0, 303.4, and 308.3 K. The binding enthalpy change {Delta}H and entropy change {Delta}S were obtained from the slope and the intercept, respectively, of the ln Ka versus 1/T plot (Maksay 1994).

FRET measurements
The efficiency E of FRET, defined as the fraction of donor excitation events that result in the excitation of the acceptor, is a function of the distance R between the donor and acceptor fluorophores, according to: 1


(5)

Since R0, the Forster distance at which E is 0.5, is typically in the nanometer range, FRET provides a reliable indicator for proximity of donor and acceptor over this distance range. The value of R0 (Å) could be calculated from the equation:


(6)

where n is the refractive index of the intervening medium, {phi}d is the fluorescence quantum yield of the donor in the absence of acceptor, {kappa}2 is the dipole orientation factor, and J (cm3/M) is the spectral overlap integral (Robert 1996). For the estimation of R0 between the MPB domain and BFR, J was determined from the emission spectrum of the protein in the absence of BFR and the absorption spectrum of BFR. This yielded the J value of 9.41 x 10–15 cm3/M for the wild-type protein, and of 9.43 x 10–15–9.50 x 10–15 cm3/M for the Trp-substituted mutants. The quantum yield of the protein {phi}MPB was recorded by a comparative method (Williams et al. 1983) relative to that of free L-Trp in water, with {phi}L-Trp reported to be 0.14 (pH 7.2), 25°C (Kirby and Steiner 1970). {phi}MPB was calculated to be 0.119 for the wild-type protein, and of 0.109–0.113 for the Trp-substituted mutants. The refractive index of the medium was 1.345 measured by a refractometer. {kappa}2 was assumed to be 2/3, a statistical average for randomly oriented donors and acceptors.

For FRET measurements, protein solutions were mixed with 0.248 µM BFR in the cuvette, and 450–550 nm emission spectra were obtained at both 280 and 340 nm excitation wavelengths with 5-nm slit in a Perkin-Elmer model LS50B luminescence spectrometer. Light at 280 nm excited both BFR and protein intrinsic fluorophores, whereas light at 340 nm excited only BFR. The two sets of emission spectra were recorded in parallel at the two excitation wavelengths. The ratio of maximal fluorescence intensities (INT280/INT340) was used as an index of FRET to correct for any errors in BFR concentration and inner filter effects caused by different protein concentrations (Hang et al. 2000).

ELISA and Western blotting
The mAbs 3E2 and 4F10 against the MPB domain were produced by Berkeley Antibody Company and tested for specificity by Western blot analysis. Bovine serum albumin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Proteins (20 µg) were loaded on 15% SDS-PAGE gel. Following electrophoresis, they were blotted onto PVDF membrane and blocked by 5% skimmed milk in PBS for 1 h before probing with the mAb (1.0 µg/mL) and sheep-anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted 1:4000; Amersham Biosciences Ltd.). Protein bands were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce). For epitope mapping, indirect ELISA was performed for the wild type and Ala-substituted MPB domain. For this purpose, microtiter plates were coated with 50 µL proteins, 1 µM in carbonate coating buffer (pH 9.6). The wells were then blocked by 5% skimmed milk. After three washes, 50 µL each of the mAbs (1.0 µg/mL) were added to the wells and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Following washing and incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h, the plates were washed and incubated with 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine/H2O2 (Zymed), a substrate of horseradish peroxidase. Reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 M H2SO4, and absorbance was read at 450 nm by an ELISA reader. Assays were carried out in triplicate and repeated twice.

Protein denaturation studies
Proteins were denatured by titration with GdCl in the presence of 2 mM DTT as previously described (Shi et al. 2002). Denaturation was monitored either by means of fluorescence emission wavelength determination upon excitation at 295 nm, or by CD molar ellipticity at 222 nm. For normalization, the fraction of unfolding fU was calculated using the equation:


(7)

where X is the measured wavelength or ellipticity variable, and XN and XU, its values under the native and fully denatured conditions, respectively.

{Delta}({Delta}G), the difference in free energy of denaturation between mutant and wild type, was estimated from the denaturation curves as described (Pace 1990) based on the equation:


(8)

where [D]0.5 is the GdCl concentration at the midpoint in the denaturation curve; the subscripts M and W denote mutant and wild type, respectively; and L is the slope of plot of {Delta}G versus [D], according to {Delta}G = {Delta}G0L x [D].

Stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy
GdCl-dependent unfolding rates were measured by fluorescence stopped-flow spectroscopy as described (Lorch et al. 1999). All stopped-flow fluorescence measurements were performed at 25 ± 0.1 °C using an Aviv Model 202 Spectrometer with a stopped-flow attachment (Aviv Instruments). Protein solution was 50 µM, and denaturant GdCl solution was 8 M. The two solutions were mixed at varying ratios to give different final GdCl concentrations. The change in fluorescence intensity upon mixing was monitored at 1-msec intervals. The unfolding rates (ku) were calculated by fitting the decay curves to the equation:


(9)

where Ia is the fluorescence amplitude of the reaction, and If, the final intensity.

Protein fold prediction
The 20 best-fitting protein 3D structures were identified by TOPITS (Rost 1995), or the 15 best-fitting ones by UCLA-DOE (Fischer and Eisenberg 1996) in terms of similarity to overlapping 120-residue fragments of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit with a scanning interval of 10 residues, as described (Xue et al. 1999), and subgrouped into structure folds according to SCOP classification (Hubbard et al. 1999).

In addition, C139–L269 of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit, together with five homologous sequences of the GABAA receptor {alpha}6, {beta}4, and {delta} subunits and glycine receptor {alpha}3 and {beta} subunits, were threaded against 3098 structural domains of 2382 protein structures from the PDB, using the fold-recognition program ProFIT from the ProCERYON package (Domingues et al. 1999). The program was set to automatically retrieve information on each structure template from the SCOP database, and rank the different fold types defined by SCOP. The median rank for the top-listed fold types was determined based on the results from the six homologs.