|
|
||||||||
Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
Reprint requests to: Subramanyam Swaminathan, Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA; e-mail: swami{at}bnl.gov; fax: (631) 344-3407.
(RECEIVED September 18, 2004; FINAL REVISION November 25, 2004; ACCEPTED November 29, 2004)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|


sandwich N-terminal domain connected to a small C-terminal helical domain. The structure of Appr-1''-pase in complex with the product, ADP-ribose, reveals an active-site water molecule poised for nucleophilic attack on the terminal phosphate group. Loop-region residues Asn 80, Asp 90, and His 145 may form a catalytic triad. Keywords: ADP-ribose-1''-monophosphate; tRNA splicing pathway; structural genomics; X-ray structure
Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.041132005.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() |
Biochemical characterization, structure, and enzymatic mechanisms of CPDase (Genschik et al. 1997; Hofmann et al. 2001) and ADPRase (Gabelli et al. 2001, 2002) have been studied extensively. However, the postulated conversion of ADP-ribose-1'' phosphate to ADP-ribose has not previously been demonstrated or studied.
In this article we identify the yeast protein responsible for Appr-1''-p processing, report the cloning, expression, purification, crystallization, and structure determination of this enzyme and its complex with ADP-ribose, and propose an enzymatic mechanism. A 32.1-kDa hypothetical yeast protein (SwissProt YMX7_YEAST) in the ADH3-RCA1 region was selected in a structural genomics project that is surveying structurefunction relationships of proteins identified by genome sequencing (http://www.nysgrc.org). A family of proteins containing only this domain has members from bacteria (SwissProt P75918 [GenBank] ), archaebacteria (O59182 [GenBank] ), and eukaryotes (Q17432), suggesting that it is involved in an important and ubiquitous cellular process. In addition, this domain is found in a number of multidomain proteins, including the C terminus of the macro-H2A his-tone protein (Q02874 [GenBank] ) and in nonstructural proteins of several types of ssRNA viruses, such as NSP2 from alphaviruses (P03317 [GenBank] ). The SMART database (Schultz et al. 1998; Letunic et al. 2002) identifies this domain as an Appr-1''-p processing enzyme, based on the extended family detection by reciprocal PSI-BLAST searches and the identification of the activity of one of the members by biochemical genomic approach (Pehrson and Fuji 1998; Martzen et al. 1999; Bateman et al. 2002). Approximately 300 proteins have so far been identified with this motif, called A1pp domain, and they have no significant sequence homology with proteins of known structure.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Description of the structure
In the crystal structure, Appr-1''-pase exists as a dimer with dimensions of 65 x 67 x 50 Å3. A monomer consists of two domains, with residues 16219 forming an
/
domain (Domain 1 or N-terminal) with a unique topology and residues 220279 (Domain 2 or C-terminal) forming a helical bundle (Fig. 1A
). The core of the
/
domain is a six-stranded
-pleated sheet. The order of the
-strands in the
-sheet is
2,
1,
6,
3,
5, and
4. Except for strand
4, the others are parallel. The
-pleated sheet is flanked by three prominent helices,
2,
3, and
4, on one side, and
1,
5, and
6 on the other (Fig. 1B
). The region between the
-helices and the
-sheet is hydrophobic. The interface between the two domains is also highly hydrophobic. Domain 2 consists of two
-helices (
7 and
8) and four 310 helices. A helical axis of the
8 is orthogonal to the axes of the other
and 310 helices. Helix
7 and the terminal 310 helix have strong interactions with Domain 1.
|
/
fold for both domains. Also, the number and order of strands are different from Appr-1''-pase. While leucine aminopeptidase has two zinc ions in the active site, Appr-1''-pase has no metal atom, at least in the crystal structure. TOPS gave the closest topology (Topology rank = 28) with flavodoxin reductase (Ingelman et al. 1997). Again, this is a two domain-structure with an
/
fold. Even though it is Rossmann or an ATP-binding protein fold, its topology and domain organization are different from the other known nucleotide-binding protein structures.
Dimeric association
Appr-1''-pase dimer is formed via a crystallographic twofold axis with approximately a 2906 Å2 buried surface area. The helical layer of Domain 1 of monomer A has strong interactions with the helical layer of Domain 2 of monomer B and vice versa (Fig. 1C
). The dimeric molecule is wedge shaped. The loops formed at the C-terminal ends of
3 (8083),
4 (112118), and
5 (150161) of domain 1 of monomer A have strong interactions with
7 and the 310 helix (224243) of Domain 2 of monomer B. While the C-terminal ends of
3,
4, and
7 of the two protomers are close together, the N-terminal ends are farthest apart, forming a wedge. These regions are filled with water molecules making strong hydrogen bonds with protein residues. There is one hydrophobic region formed by residues Phe 171, Trp 175, Leu 231, and Leu 235 of monomer A and Tyr 114 and Val 150 of monomer B in the dimeric interface. This hydrophobic core is followed by stacking interactions in the order one above the other, Arg 107, Tyr 84, and Phe 242 of monomer A and Phe 239 of monomer B. Apart from these, one salt bridge is formed between Asp 225 of monomer A with Arg 107 of monomer B in addition to hydrogen bonds. OE1 and NE2 of Gln 160 of monomer A make strong hydrogen bonds with NE2 and OE1 of Gln 160 of monomer B. Four water molecules were located in the interface.
Binding site
In the native structure, a deep pocket has been identified in a crevice formed by the C-terminal ends of strands
3 and
5, and is typical of the binding site in the Rossmann fold. This pocket is lined with residues Pro 78, Gly 79, Asn 80, Gly 86, Gly 87, Gly 88, Phe 89, Asp 90, Thr 148, Val 149, Pro 152, Ala 154, Pro 191, Gly 192, Leu 193, Cys 194, Thr 195, Gly 196, Tyr 197, and Ala 198. These residues are mainly located in the loop regions LL3, LL4, and LL5. One xylitol molecule is bound in this cleft. It makes strong hydrogen bonds with Asp 23 OD1, Phe 89 N, and through water molecules with N and O of Cys 194 and Gly 52, respectively (Fig. 2
). The substrate binding may involve this region.
|
|
-sheet, mainly on strands
1,
3,
5, and
6, and is wrapped around by the small loops L1 and L2, and large loops LL3, LL4, and LL5 (Fig. 3B
Bound ADP-ribose is a C-shaped structure, and the adenine ring makes an angle of approximately 45° with the terminal ribose ring in the Appr-1''-pase structure (Fig. 3B
), which is different from ADP-ribose bound to the Nudix hydrolase ADPRase, where it resembles a horse shoe. In the Appr-1''-pase complex with ADP-ribose, the adenosine group of the ADP-ribose binds to the enzyme in the anti conformation, which is evident from the glycosylic bond torsion angle (94°). The adenine base is sitting on the hydrophobic pocket formed by residues Leu 54, Phe 89, and Ala 92. The N6 atom of the adenine ring makes one hydrogen bond with Gln 55, and the N1 atom is free, which is in contrast to other ATP-binding proteins, where both N1 and N6 are involved in hydrogen bonding. The O2* and O3* of the ribose (ribose1) make strong hydrogen bonds with carboxylate atoms of Asp 23 in addition to a water molecule and Thr 195 (Fig. 3D
).
and
phosphate groups of the ADPR are buried in the cleft formed by the Appr-1''-pase with respect to the adenine and terminal ribose ring. The charge of the
-phosphate is neutralized by the sodium ions. The positively charged region seen in Figure 3C
is probably due to this and the main-chain amide groups. Both
and
phosphates make strong hydrogen bonds with main-chain atoms. Interestingly, there is no Arg or Lys in this region to have interactions with
and
phosphate groups, which is usually observed in proteins containing a typical nucleotide-binding domain. In this structure the closest lysine (Lys 91) is 9.8 Å from the terminal ribose oxygen, O2*.
The terminal ribose ring is buried in the cleft closer to the opening and pointing toward the solvent region. An ethylene glycol molecule binds to this terminal ribose ring through a water molecule (Fig. 3D
). The O2* atom of the terminal ribose makes a strong hydrogen bond network with residues Asp 90, His 145, Asn 80, and a structural water molecule of Appr-1''-pase. The structure of the complex between ADP-ribose and Appr-1''-pase reveals unambiguously the location and extent of binding.
A probable scheme for catalytic mechanism
Based on the ADP-ribose binding to Appr-1''-pase, we have modeled the Appr-1''-p in the active site. We positioned the ADP-ribose1''-monophosphate in the place of ADP-ribose with slight changes in the protein residues Tyr 197 and Asn 83 and terminal ribose sugar of the ADP-ribose to relieve short contacts. The molecule fits well in the cavity and the terminal phosphate group interacts with the protein residues. Interestingly, there is one structural water (w2) molecule, which is about 3.7 Å from the phosphorus atom of the terminal phosphate group, making a hydrogen-bond network with Asp 90 and His 145 through another structural water (w5) (Fig. 4A
). Terminal phosphate oxygen atom O1 forms a hydrogen bond with Gly 86 N, and Gly 86 O makes a hydrogen bond with Lys 91 NZ. Phosphate oxygen O2 forms a hydrogen bond with one water molecule (w88) and O3 with Asn 80. Based on this binding environment and hydrogen-bond network with water molecules, we propose the following scheme for catalytic mechanism.
|
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells were lysed in Bugbuster + Benzonase (Novagen). The P089 protein was purified by chromatography on a 2.5 cm x 17 cm Fractogel EMD SO3 650(M) column at room temperature in a gradient of 01 M NaCl in 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), followed by gel filtration at 4°C on a 2.5 cm x 60 cm Superdex 75 column in 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) (natural protein) or 125 mM ammonium sulfate, 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) (SeMet protein). The purified protein appeared to elute from the gel-filtration column as a dimer. Purification was followed by gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate. The P089 protein band was identified by its intensity and position relative to the pattern of total proteins of induced cells, staining the gel with Coomassie blue. The natural protein was concentrated to approximately 6 mg/mL and stored in 250 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0). The SeMet protein was concentrated to approximately 6 mg/mL and stored in 125 mM ammonium sulfate, 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0).
Initial crystallization conditions were obtained with the use of Hampton Research Crystal Screens but restricting the trials to pH values close to the pI (5.5) of the protein. Two microliters of protein at a concentration of 6.0 mg mL1 and 2 µL of the precipitant were placed in a microbridge, which was in turn placed inside Linbro plate wells containing appropriate precipitants. The wells were sealed with clear tape and left at room temperature. Initial trials gave microcrystals in a wide range of conditions with various PEGs and pH ranges (5.07.0). Good-quality native crystals were obtained in 18% PEG 6K, 100 mM citric acid (pH 5.0), 3% xylitol, and 200 mM LiCl. Long rectangular bar-like crystals with dimension 0.2 x 0.15 x 0.30 mm3 were obtained within a week. These crystals diffracted to better than 2.5 Å resolution. Crystals were flash frozen by adding 20% glycerol to the mother liquor before the crystal was mounted on a Hampton loop.
To determine the structure, selenomethionine-labeled protein was used. Crystals of the SeMet P089 protein were grown in conditions similar to those for the native sample by the vapor diffusion in sitting drops at room temperature. Equal volumes of protein (6 mg/mL) and a solution containing 20% PEG 6K in 75 mM citric acid (pH 5.0), with 3% xylitol and 500 mM NH4Cl were mixed and equilibrated against a 800-µL reservoir containing the same precipitant solution.
Data collection and structure determination
MAD data extending to 2.2 Å were collected near the selenium absorption edge from a single crystal at liquid nitrogen temperature using the Brandeis 4 detector at beamline X12C of the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS).
Data were reduced with HKL2000 (Otwinowski and Minor 1997) and the data collection statistics are given in Table 1
. Crystals belong to the monoclinic space group C2 with cell dimensions, a = 107.69, b = 38.15, c = 64.74 Å, and
= 112.21° (Table 1
). Assuming one molecule of 32,067 Da per asymmetric unit, the Matthews coefficient (Matthews 1968) is 1.89 Å3/Da, corresponding to an estimated solvent content of 35% by volume of the unit cell. This crystal undergoes radiation damage. At the end of the high-energy remote data, the crystal diffracted to only 2.7 Å.
|
Complex ADP-ribose and Appr-1''-p
Appr-1''-pase was co-crystallized with ADP-ribose by vapor diffusion in sitting drops at room temperature. Equal volumes of protein (6 mg/mL) mixed with ADP-ribose (50 mM) and a solution containing 25% PEG 3350 in 100 mM bis-tris (pH 5.0), with 5% ethylene glycol and 200 mM LiSO4 were mixed and equilibrated against a 800-µL reservoir containing the same precipitant solution. The structure of the complex was determined by rigid-body refinement of the native structure. The composite omit map and the difference Fourier clearly showed the electron density for the ADP-ribose in addition to two sulfate ions, one sodium ion and one ethylene glycol. ADP-ribose was modeled in the density and refined with CNS until convergence. The refinement statistics are shown in the Table 1
. Coordinates have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 1TXZ
[PDB]
).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brunger, A.T., Adams, P.D., Clore, G.M., Delano, W.L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Jiang, J.S., Kuszwewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N.S., et al. 1998. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macro-molecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54: 905921.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burley, S.K., David, P.R., Taylor, A., and Lipscomb, W.N. 1990. Molecular structure of leucine aminopeptidase at 2.7 Å resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87: 68786882.
Cowtan, K. 1994. DM: An automated procedure for phase improvement by density modification. Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACBM newsletter on protein crystallography. 31: 3438.
Culver, G.M., Consaul, S.A., Tycowski, K.T., Filipowicz, W., and Phizicky, E.M. 1994. tRNA splicing in yeast and wheat germ. A cyclic phosphodiesterase implicated in the metabolism of ADP-ribose 1'', 2''-cyclic phosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 2492824934.
De La Fortelle, E. and Bricogne, G. 1997. Maximum-likelihood heavy atom parameter refinement in the MIR and MAD methods. Methods Enzymol. 276: 472493.
Gabelli, S.B., Bianchet, M.A., Bessman, M.J., and Amzel, L.M. 2001. The structure of ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase reveals the structural basis for the versatility of the Nudix family. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8: 467472.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gabelli, S.B., Bianchet, M.A., Ohnishi, Y., Ichikawa, Y., Bessman, M.J., and Amzel, L.M. 2002. Mechanism of the Escherichia coli ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, a Nudix hydrolase. Biochemistry 41: 92799285.[CrossRef][Medline]
Genschik, P., Hall, J., and Filipowicz, W. 1997. Cloning and characterization of the Arabidopsis cyclic phosphodiesterase which hydrolyzes ADP-ribose 1'',2''-cyclic phosphate and nucleoside 2',3'-cyclic phosphates. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 1321113219.
Gerchman, S.E., Graziano, V., and Ramakrishnan, V. 1994. Expression of chicken linker histones in E. coli: Sources of problems and methods for overcoming some of the difficulties. Protein Expr. Purif. 5: 242251.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gilbert, D., Westhead, D., Nagano, N., and Thornton, J. 1999. Motif-based searching in TOPS protein topology databases. Bioinformatics 15: 317326.
Hofmann, A., Zdanov, A., Genschik, P., Ruvinov, S., Filipowicz, W., and Wlodawer, A. 2000. Structure and mechanism of activity of the cyclic phosphodiesterase of Appr>p, a product of the tRNA splicing reaction. EMBO J. 19: 62076217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1996. Mapping the protein universe. Science 273: 595603.
Ingelman, M., Bianchi, V., and Eklund, H. 1997. The three-dimensional structure of flavodoxin reductase from Escherichia coli at 1.7 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 147157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jones, T.A., Zou, J., Cowtan, S., and Kjeldgaard, M. 1991. Improved methods in building protein models in electron density map and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A 47: 110119.
Kraulis, P.J. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of proteins. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946950.[CrossRef]
Letunic, I., Goodstadt, L., Dickens, N.J., Doerks, T., Schultz, J., Mott, R., Ciccarelli, F., Copley, R.R., Ponting, C.P., and Bork, P. 2002. Recent improvements to the SMART domain-based sequence annotation resource. Nucleic Acid Res. 30: 242244.
Martzen, M.R., McCraith, S.M., Spinelli, S.L., Torres, F.M., Fields, S., Gray-hack, E.J., and Phizicky, E.M. 1999. A biochemical genomics approach for identifying genes by the activity of their products. Science 286: 11531155.
Matthews, B.W. 1968. Solvent content of protein cyrstals. J. Mol. Biol. 33: 491497.[Medline]
Merritt, E.A. 1994. Raster3D version 2.0. A program for photorealistic molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50: 869873.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nicholls, A., Sharp, K.A., and Honig, B. 1991. Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 11: 281296.[CrossRef][Medline]
Otwinowski, Z. and Minor, W. 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276: 307326.
Pehrson, J.R. and Fuji, R.N. 1998. Evolutionary conservation of histone macroH2A subtypes and domains. Nucleic Acid Res. 26: 28372842.
Perrakis, A., Morris, R., and Lamzin, V.S. 1999. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6: 458463.[CrossRef][Medline]
Phizicky, E.M. and Greer, C.L. 1993. Pre-tRNA splicing: Variation on a theme or exception to the rule? Trends Biochem. Sci. 18: 3134.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schultz, J., Milpetz, F., Bork, P., and Ponting, C.P. 1998. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: Identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 58575864.
Studier, F.W. and Moffatt, B.A. 1986. Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J. Mol. Biol. 189: 113130.[CrossRef][Medline]
Terwilliger, T.C. and Berendzen, J. 1997. Automated structure solution for MIR and MAD. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55: 849861.
Wlodawer, A. and Sjolin, L. 1983. Structure of ribonuclease A: A result of joint neutron and X-ray refinement at 2.0 Å resolutiom. Biochemistry 22: 27202728.[CrossRef][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-P. Egloff, H. Malet, A. Putics, M. Heinonen, H. Dutartre, A. Frangeul, A. Gruez, V. Campanacci, C. Cambillau, J. Ziebuhr, et al. Structural and Functional Basis for ADP-Ribose and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Binding by Viral Macro Domains. J. Virol., September 1, 2006; 80(17): 8493 - 8502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Shull, S. L. Spinelli, and E. M. Phizicky Letter to the Editor Protein Sci., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 3145 - 3145. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Putics, W. Filipowicz, J. Hall, A. E. Gorbalenya, and J. Ziebuhr ADP-Ribose-1"-Monophosphatase: a Conserved Coronavirus Enzyme That Is Dispensable for Viral Replication in Tissue Culture J. Virol., October 15, 2005; 79(20): 12721 - 12731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |