HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ps.051485205v1 14/8/2080    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pedelini, L. Articles by Sanz, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pedelini, L. Articles by Sanz, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Structure—function analysis of the 5 and the 13 helices of human glucokinase: Description of two novel activating mutations

¹ Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Valencia, Spain
² Fundación Instituto Mediterráneo para el Avance de la Biotecnología y la Investigación Sanitaria (IMABIS), Málaga, Spain
³ Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Carlos Haya Hospital, Málaga, Spain

Reprint requests to: Pascual Sanz, Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (CSIC), Jaime Roig 11, 46010-Valencia, Spain; e-mail: sanz{at}ibv.csic.es; fax: +3496-3690800.

(RECEIVED March 31, 2005; FINAL REVISION May 3, 2005; ACCEPTED May 4, 2005)

	Abstract

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
It was recently described that the 5 and the 13 helices of human pancreatic glucokinase play a major role in the allosteric regulation of the enzyme. In order to understand the structural importance of these helices, we have performed site-directed mutagenesis to generate glucokinase derivatives with altered residues. We have analyzed the kinetic parameters of these mutated forms and compared them with wild-type and previously defined activating mutations in these helices (A456V and Y214C). We found two new activating mutations, A460R and Y215A, which increase the affinity of the enzyme for glucose. Our results suggest that substitutions in the 5 or the 13 helices that favor the closed, active conformation of the enzyme, either by improving the interaction with surrounding residues or by improving the flexibility of the region defined by these two helices, enhance the affinity of the enzyme for glucose, and therefore its performance as a glucose phosphorylating enzyme.

Keywords: glucokinase; activating mutation; GKAs; glucose signaling; enzyme kinetics

Abbreviations: GST, glutathione-S-transferase • IPTG, isopropyl--D-thiogalactoside • PCR, polymerase chain reaction • SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.051485205.

	Introduction

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Glucokinase B (GlkB, hexokinase IV) is the first enzyme of the glycolytic pathway in pancreatic -cells. It phosphorylates the glucose that enters these cells through the GLUT2 glucose transporter to produce Glu-6P, which is then used to obtain the energy necessary for cell viability. The kinetic properties of GLUT2 (high capacity, low-affinity glucose transporter) and GlkB (low affinity for glucose and absence of allosteric regulation by Glu-6P) define GlkB as the key regulator of glucose consumption. For this reason, several authors have considered GlkB as the "glucose sensor" of pancreatic -cells (Matschinsky et al. 1993, 1998; Matschinsky 1996, 2002; Zelent et al. 2005). In addition, a positive correlation between the functionality of GlkB and the ability of pancreatic -cells to respond to increased levels of glucose in blood by enhancing insulin secretion and production has been described. In this way, GlkB participates in maintaining the blood glucose concentration around 5 mM. Inactivating mutations in one or both alleles of glucokinase gene (GCK) leads to an enzyme with low activity, which increases the threshold for glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) from its physiological setting of 5 mM. These type of mutations are associated with a mild form of diabetes mellitus in young people, known as maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 2 (MODY2), or with severe permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM). On the other hand, mutations in the GCK gene that increase the affinity of the enzyme for glucose decrease the threshold for GSIS, and therefore trigger insulin secretion at lower concentrations of glucose in blood. These mutations are associated with both mild and severe forms of persistent hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in infancy (PHHI-GK) (for reviews, see Matschinsky 2002, Gloyn 2003, and Zelent et al. 2005).

The recently defined crystal structure of human GlkB (Kamata et al. 2004) indicates that this protein has a large and a small domain, separated by a deep cleft. Glucose binds to the interdomain cleft, composed of residues of the large domain (Glu256 and Glu290), the small domain (Thr168 and Lys169), and the connecting region I (Asn204 and Asp205). Upon binding to substrates (glucose and ATP), GlkB undergoes a conformational change that brings the large and the small domain physically closer, resulting in a closed, active conformation. The 13 helix, within the small domain, plays a crucial role in the conformational change that occurs between the active and inactive forms of the enzyme (Kamata et al. 2004). It was proposed that modifications in the 13 helix that make the closed conformation more stable should render enzymes with higher glucose affinity. Moreover, it was suggested that activating mutations within the 13 helix, such as V455M (Glaser et al. 1998) and A456V (Christesen et al. 2002), seemed to inhibit the release of this helix after glucose consumption, perhaps as a result of their bulkier side chains (Kamata et al. 2004). Other activating mutations, such as Y214A (Moukil et al. 2000) and Y214C (Cuesta-Munoz et al. 2004) could affect the flexibility of the region involved in the conformational change maintaining the enzyme in the closed, active form (Kamata et al. 2004), thus explaining the severe clinical phenotype presented by the patient with the glucokinase-activating mutation Y214C recently identified (Cuesta-Munoz et al. 2004).

To study the structure–function relationship of the domains involved in the conformational change of GlkB, we have constructed different mutants in residues located in the 5 and the 13 helices of the enzyme and tested the kinetic parameters of the resulting forms. We have found that substitutions that favor the closed, active conformation, either by improving the interaction with surrounding residues or by improving the flexibility of the region defined by these two helices, enhance the affinity of the enzyme for glucose, and therefore its performance as a glucose phosphorylating enzyme.

	Results

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Structure–function analysis of the 13 helix
In order to perform a structure–function analysis of the glucokinase 13 helix, we constructed different mutants in this helix and tested the kinetic parameters of the resulting forms. Modifications were chosen according to the amino acid sequence present in the same helix of human hexokinase I, a high-affinity glucose phosphorylating enzyme (Wilson 2003). As observed in Figure 1, the 13 helices of glucokinase and hexokinase I display a high degree of homology; however, the similarity between both sequences is not maintained in the C-terminal part of the helices. For this reason, we modified the following residues in GlkB sequence: C457V, K458R, K459L, and A460R (Table 1). We then compared the kinetic parameters of the mutated forms with those of the wild type and the activating mutation A456V (Christesen et al. 2002), a modification previously reported to produce a high-affinity glucose phosphorylating glucokinase. Since in regular conditions of glucose homeostasis the concentration of glucose in human blood is around 5 mM and there are saturating concentrations of ATP, we assumed that the activity of the enzyme at 5 mM glucose and saturating concentrations of ATP (5 mM) would be a better parameter than V_max to correlate the activity of the enzyme with its performance under physiological conditions. As shown in Figure 2A and Table 2, the K458R mutation resulted in an enzyme with lower glucose affinity (S0.5, 12.28 mM) and lower ATP affinity (K_m, 0.81 mM) than the wild type (S0.5, 7.52 mM; K_m, 0.41 mM, respectively). The activity of the K458R mutant at 5 mM glucose was also lower than the wild type (3.6 units/mg vs. 5.9 units/ mg; Fig. 2C). The lower affinity for glucose and ATP and the lower activity at 5 mM glucose suggested that this mutated form had a poorer performance as a glucose phosphorylating enzyme.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Alignment of the 5 and the 13 helices of human GlkB and hexokinase I. Amino acid sequences corresponding to the 5 and 13 helices of human GlkB (Swiss-Prot accession no. P35557 [GenBank] ) and hexokinase I (Swiss-Prot accession no. P19367 [GenBank] ) were aligned using the CLUSTALW program. Mutated residues were on top of the GlkB sequence. Numbers indicate the beginning and the end of each helix in each sequence.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Glucose-dependent activity of mutated forms of glucokinase. (A) Mutated forms in the 13 helix. (B) Mutated forms in the 5 helix. (C) Specific activity of mutated forms of glucokinase at 5 mM glucose and saturating concentrations of ATP (5 mM). A representative experiment of at least three different kinetic determinations is shown.

In the case of the A460R mutant, it displayed a very high affinity for glucose (S0.5, 1.94mM), similar to the one found in the previously reported (Christesen et al. 2002) activating mutation A456V (S0.5, 1.81 mM) (Fig. 2A; Table 2), although the affinity for ATP was slightly lower than the wild type (K_m, 0.55 mM). The activity of the mutated enzyme at 5mM glucose was also higher than the wild type (18.9 units/mg) (Fig. 2C) and similar to the activity found in the A456V mutant (20.6 units/mg) (Fig. 2C). These results indicate that A460R is a novel activating mutation of GlkB.

Structure–function analysis of the 5 helix
As mentioned above, the crystal structure of GlkB indicated that the 13 helix is involved in a major conformational change between the closed and open forms of the enzyme, requiring the breakage and reformation of numerous interactions among the layers (Kamata et al. 2004). Since the 5 helix is close to the 13 helix in this movement, we wondered whether modifications in residues of the 5 helix could affect the transition movement of the 13 helix and, therefore, modify the glucose affinity of the enzyme. Following a similar approach as above (Fig. 1), we constructed mutant A208G and compared its kinetic parameters with Y214C, a recently identified activating mutation of GlkB located in 5 helix (Cuesta-Munoz et al. 2004). In addition, we constructed mutant Y215A, due to its close similarity to Y214C. As shown in Figure 2B and Table 2, the A208G mutant displayed a slightly higher glucose affinity (S0.5, 5.66 mM) and similar ATP affinity (K_m, 0.43 mM) to the wild type. The activity of the enzyme at 5 mM glucose was also moderately higher than the wild type (A208G, 7.2 units/mg), suggesting a slightly better performance as glucose phosphorylating enzyme. However, the kinetic parameters of the Y215A mutant (S0.5, 2.20 mM; specific activity at 5 mM glucose, 15.5 units/mg) (Fig. 2; Table 2) were in the range of those of the activating mutations A456V and A460R described above, although the affinity for ATP was slightly lower than the wild type (K_m 0.65 mM). Therefore, Y215A could be considered as another novel activating mutation of GlkB. Finally, the activating mutation Y214C exhibited a high affinity for glucose and ATP (S0.5, 1.87 mM; K_m, 0.29 mM) and the highest activity at 5 mM glucose (31.7 units/mg) among all the mutants tested (Fig. 2; Table 2).

	Discussion

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
It was recently suggested that GlkB may exist in three structural conformations that define two catalytic cycles. One cycle involves the transition from a closed, active form to an intermediate open active form and then to a super–open inactive form (slow catalytic cycle). The other proposed cycle involves only a transition from the closed active form to the open active form (fast catalytic cycle). The ratio between these two catalytic cycles is responsible for the characteristic sigmoidal response to glucose of this enzyme. In the case of the slow catalytic cycle, the enzyme shows high kinetic cooperativity (high Hill number) and low affinity for glucose, whereas in the fast catalytic cycle the enzyme shows no cooperativity (low Hill number) and has high affinity for glucose (Kamata et al. 2004) (Fig. 3A). Our results are consistent with this hypothesis, since all the activating mutations we have studied (A456V, A460R, Y214C, and Y215A) produced enzymes with low cooperativity (low Hill number) and high glucose affinity (Table 2). Our results also suggest that in these mutants the fast catalytic cycle is much more important than the slow catalytic cycle and that all these mutations favor the closed, active conformation of the enzyme.

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Effects of the A208G, C457V, K459L, and K458R modifications on the structure model of GlkB. (A) Closed (left) and super–open (right) conformations of wild-type glucokinase (Kamata et al. 2004). Large and small domains are colored in dark and in light gray, respectively. The 5 helix is colored in blue, the 13 helix is in yellow, and the connecting region I is in green. Residues that are modified are indicated as red (13 helix) or purple (5 helix) spheres. The position of glucose (cyan) in the closed conformation is also indicated. (B,C) Impact of described mutations in the closed (B) and super–open (C) conformations of glucokinase. The modified and interacting residue side chains are displayed as ball-and-stick structures with carbon atoms colored in orange and in pale green, respectively. Nitrogen atoms are colored in blue, sulfur in violet, and oxygen in red. The hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are denoted with dotted black lines. A rich area in hydrophobic residues (hydrophobic patch) is defined by a hatched line.

View larger version (55K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Effects of the A460R and Y215A modifications on the structure model of GlkB. (A) Impact of the A460R mutation in the closed conformation of glucokinase. (B) Impact of the Y215A mutation in the super–open conformation of glucokinase. Similar drawing code as in legend of Figure 3.

We also describe three mutations that produce enzymes with a slightly higher activity (C457V, K459L, and A208G). We have evaluated these mutations using the model-based approach described above. As shown in Figure 3, the transition from the super–open to the closed conformation produces a change in the solvent exposure of the side chain of the residues located in the 13-helix. The C457 side chain is completely exposed to the solvent in the super–open form, but is relocated to the boundary of a hydrophobic patch in the closed, active enzyme. The C457V change increases the side chain hydrophobicity, favoring interactions in the closed conformation of the enzyme. This effect is accentuated in the previously described A456V activating mutation (Christesen et al. 2002), located one residue before, where the new Val residue side chain is completely oriented toward the hydrophobic patch in the closed active form (not shown). On the contrary, the K459 side chain is pointed toward the 4 strand in the super–open conformation, and is totally exposed to the solvent in the closed conformation. The K459L mutation is difficult to evaluate because the new residue, rigid and highly hydrophobic, does not seem to properly accommodate in either of the two conformations: The closed form would be unfavorable because of the exposure of the new Leu side chain to the solvent, but in the super–open form this residue would have steric problems with the 4 strand. Finally, the A208 residue is located in the 5 helix and the mutation to a Gly residue may increase the flexibility of the helix. The higher flexibility of this key helix may promote the transition between the super–open and closed forms, decreasing the Hill number, although with a minimum repercussion on the kinetic enzyme parameters.

In addition, we describe two novel activating mutations of GlkB, A460R, and Y215A, affecting the 13 and the 5 helices, respectively. In the case of A460R, the new positive charge of the Arg side chain is well positioned to interact with Asp158 and Asp160, when the enzyme adopts the closed, active form (Fig. 4A shows an Arg rotamer forming two salt bridges with Asp158 and Asp160). In addition, the new Arg residue could also interact with Asp198, mimicking the interaction of the corresponding Arg residue in hexokinase I (Arg912) with Asp650 (Asp198 in GlkB; data not shown). These new interactions would lock the protein into the closed conformation, blocking the transition to the super–open form and preventing the enzyme from entering the slow catalytic cycle. This suggestion is consistent with our observation that the mutated enzyme presents a very low cooperativity (low Hill number) and a high affinity for glucose (Table 2). In the case of the Y215A, the substitution of Tyr by an Ala residue would eliminate a hydrogen bond between the former Tyr residue side chain and the Gly72 residue main chain in the super–open conformation (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, in the super–open conformation, Tyr215 is accommodated in a hydrophobic pocket formed byTrp99, Val101, Ile211, Leu451, andVal455 (not shown). As a result of the Y215A mutation, a reduction in these hydrophobic interactions is expected. The loss of the hydrogen bond and the reduction in the hydrophobic interactions might favor the transition from the super–open to the closed, active form of the enzyme. In addition, the Tyr215 residue is located in the way of the transition movement that follows the 13 helix during the conformational change, so the replacement of the Tyr bulky side chain by the small one of the new Ala residue would favor the acquisition of the closed active conformation (Fig. 4B). A similar explanation could be applied for the activating Y214C mutation.

The two new mutations we describe (A460R and Y215A) adds to the group of activating GlkB mutations described so far: T65I, W99R, Y214C, V455M, and A456V (Glaser et al. 1998; Christesen et al. 2002; Gloyn et al. 2003; Cuesta-Munoz et al. 2004). Surprisingly, all the activating mutations are clustered in a defined area about 20 Å away from the glucose binding site, and therefore could represent an allosteric activator site that may be responsive to an endogenous activator still to be discovered (Grimsby et al. 2003; Kamata et al. 2004; Zelent et al. 2005). This fact has prompted the development of drugs that act as allosteric activators of GlkB (GKAs), that can be used as potential anti-diabetic drugs (Grimsby et al. 2003; Brocklehurst et al. 2004; Kamata et al. 2004). In one case, the drug contact points have been identified: V62, R63, M210, I211, Y214, Y215, M235, V452, and V455 (Kamata et al. 2004). It is worth noting that two naturally occurring activating mutations (Y214C and V455M) and one artificial mutation described in this work (Y215A) are GKAs contact sites. Moreover, the other naturally occurring activating mutations (T65I, W99R, and A456V) and the other artificial mutation described in this work (A460R) are located within or close to the activator site.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that substitutions in the 5 and the 13 helices which favor the interaction with surrounding residues in the closed, active conformation or eliminate those in the super–open, inactive conformation, and substitutions in the 5 helix that improve the flexibility of the region defined by these two helixes, displace the super–open/closed equilibrium toward the acquisition of a closed, active conformation. These modifications improve the affinity of the enzyme toward its substrate and, therefore, its performance as a glucose phosphorylating enzyme.

	Materials and methods

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Site-directed mutagenesis
All the mutants used in this study were obtained using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene. Plasmid pUC-GlkB (Mayordomo and Sanz 2001), containing wild-type human pancreatic glucokinase gene, was used as the template in the PCR reactions using the oligonucletides described in Table 1. Mutants were sequenced to confirm the absence of undesired mutations. Plasmids containing the corresponding mutations were digested with EcoRI and SalI, and the resulting fragments subcloned into plasmid pGEX6P-1 (Amersham Biosciences) to allow its expression in Escherichia coli as a glutathionyl S-transferase (GST) fusion protein.

Purification of GST-fusion proteins
Purification of the mutated GST-GlkB fusion proteins was carried out as described by Zhang et al. (1992), with some modifications. E. coli transformants harboring the different GST-fusions were grown in 50 mL of LB+ampicillin (50 µg/ mL) at 30°C until the absorbance at 600 nm reached a value of around 0.5. IPTG was then added to a concentration of 1 mM and cultures were grown at 30°C for 2 h. Cells were harvested and resuspended in 20 mL of sonication buffer (100 mM Triethanolamine–HCl [pH 7.6], 10 mM MgCl₂, 2 mM DTT, 200 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM PMSF, and complete protease inhibitor cocktail) (Roche). Cells were disrupted by sonication and the fusion proteins purified by passing the extracts through 1-mL bed volume of glutathione-sepharose columns (Amersham Biosciences). GST-GlkB fusion proteins were eluted from the column with 5 mM glutathione in sonication buffer. Samples were stored at –80°C. Purity of the recombinant GST-GlkB proteins was routinely screened by SDS-PAGE. At least three different purifications were carried out for each mutant.

Kinetic determinations
To determine the kinetic parameters of the recombinant GSTGlkB proteins, the standard glucokinase assay (Liang et al. 1995) was performed using a range of substrate concentrations. To determine the affinity for glucose the assay contained 5 mM ATP and a concentration of glucose ranging from 0.5 mM to 100 mM (11 different dilutions). Because of the cooperative nature of the GST-GlkB enzymes, data for glucose-dependent activity were fitted to the Hill equation to determine the S0.5 (mM), V_max (units/mg protein) and Hill coefficient (h). One unit of glucokinase is defined as the amount of enzyme that is able to phosphorylate 1 µmol of glucose per minute, at 30°C under the assay conditions. To determine the affinity for ATP the assay contained 100 mM glucose and a concentration of ATP ranging from 0.1 to 5 mM (11 different dilutions). Data for ATP-dependent activity was fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation to determine the K_m (mM) (Hofstee plots). It has been previously described that the addition of an N-terminal GST tail to GlkB has no effects on enzyme kinetics (Liang et al. 1995).

Prediction of structural effects of glucokinase mutations
Crystal coordinates from the closed active (1V4S) and super–open inactive (1V4T) conformation of GlkB (Kamata et al. 2004) were visualized and mutations evaluated using O program (Jones and Kjeldgaard 1997). Figures 3 and 4 were generated with MolScript (Kraulis 1991) and Render 3D (Merritt and Bacon 1997) programs using the original or O-program modified PDBs.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Novo-Nordisk Pharma S.A. for its support. This work has been financed by the Research and Technological Development Project (QLG1-CT-2001-01488) funded by the European Commission and the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science grant BMC2002-00208 to P.S. This work has also been supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III Network grants RCMN (C03/08) to P.S., A.L.C.M., and F.C.S., and RGDM (G03/212) to P.S. L.P. is supported by a predoctoral I3P fellowship from CSIC. A.L.C.M. was supported by Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology grant no. CYT-836, by a Novo-Nordisk Pharma grant, by SAF2001/3623, and by the FIS of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, grant no. 02/PI021473. F.C.S. was also supported by FIS 04/883.

	References

TOP Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References

 
Brocklehurst, K.J., Payne, V.A., Davies, R.A., Carroll, D., Vertigan, H.L., Wightman, H.J., Aiston, S., Waddell, I.D., Leighton, B., Coghlan, M.P., et al. 2004. Stimulation of hepatocyte glucose metabolism by novel small molecule glucokinase activators. Diabetes 53: 535–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christesen, H.B., Jacobsen, B.B., Odili, S., Buettger, C., Cuesta-Munoz, A., Hansen, T., Brusgaard, K.,Massa, O., Magnuson, M.A., Shiota, C., et al. 2002. The second activating glucokinase mutation (A456V): Implications for glucose homeostasis and diabetes therapy. Diabetes 51: 1240–1246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cuesta-Munoz, A.L., Huopio, H., Otonkoski, T., Gomez-Zumaquero, J.M., Nanto-Salonen, K., Rahier, J., Lopez-Enriquez, S., Garcia-Gimeno, M.A., Sanz, P., Soriguer, F.C., et al. 2004. Severe persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia due to a de novo glucokinase mutation. Diabetes 53: 2164–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glaser, B., Kesavan, P., Heyman, M., Davis, E., Cuesta, A., Buchs, A., Stanley, C.A., Thornton, P.S., Permutt, M.A., Matschinsky, F.M., et al. 1998. Familial hyperinsulinism caused by an activating glucokinase mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 338: 226–230.[Free Full Text]

Gloyn, A.L. 2003. Glucokinase (GCK) mutations in hyper- and hypoglycemia: Maturity-onset diabetes of the young, permanent neonatal diabetes, and hyperinsulinemia of infancy. Hum. Mutat. 22: 353–362.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gloyn, A.L., Noordam, K., Willemsen, M.A., Ellard, S., Lam, W.W., Campbell, I.W., Midgley, P., Shiota, C., Buettger, C., Magnuson, M.A., et al. 2003. Insights into the biochemical and genetic basis of glucokinase activation from naturally occurring hypoglycemia mutations. Diabetes 52: 2433–2440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grimsby, J., Sarabu, R., Corbett, W.L., Haynes, N.E., Bizzarro, F.T., Coffey, J.W., Guertin, K.R., Hilliard, D.W., Kester, R.F., Mahaney, P.E., et al. 2003. Allosteric activators of glucokinase: Potential role in diabetes therapy. Science 301: 370–373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jones, T.A. and Kjeldgaard, M.O. 1997. Electron-density map interpretation. Methods Enzymol. 277: 173–208.

Kamata, K., Mitsuya, M., Nishimura, T., Eiki, J., and Nagata, Y. 2004. Structural basis for allosteric regulation of the monomeric allosteric enzyme human glucokinase. Structure 12: 429–438.[Medline]

Kraulis, P.J. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946–950.[CrossRef]

Liang, Y., Kesavan, P., Wang, L.Q., Niswender, K., Tanizawa, Y., Permutt, M.A., Magnuson, M.A., and Matschinsky, F.M. 1995. Variable effects of maturity-onset-diabetes-of-youth (MODY)-associated glucokinase mutations on substrate interactions and stability of the enzyme. Biochem. J. 309: 167–173.

Matschinsky, F.M. 1996. Banting lecture 1995. A lesson in metabolic regulation inspired by the glucokinase glucose sensor paradigm. Diabetes 45: 223–241.[Abstract]

———. 2002. Regulation of pancreatic -cell glucokinase: From basics to therapeutics. Diabetes 51: S394–S404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Matschinsky, F., Liang, Y., Kesavan, P., Wang, L., Froguel, P., Velho, G., Cohen, D., Permutt, M.A., Tanizawa, Y., Jetton, T.L., et al. 1993. Glucokinase as pancreatic cell glucose sensor and diabetes gene. J. Clin. Invest. 92: 2092–2098.

Matschinsky, F.M., Glaser, B., and Magnuson, M.A. 1998. Pancreatic cell glucokinase: Closing the gap between theoretical concepts and experimental realities. Diabetes 47: 307–315.[Abstract]

Mayordomo, I. and Sanz, P. 2001. Human pancreatic glucokinase (GlkB) complements the glucose signalling defect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae hxk2 mutants. Yeast 18: 1309–1316.[CrossRef][Medline]

Merritt, E.A. and Bacon, D.J. 1997. Raster3D: Photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol. 277: 505–524.[Medline]

Moukil, M.A., Veiga-da-Cunha, M., and Van Schaftingen, E. 2000. Study of the regulatory properties of glucokinase by site-directed mutagenesis: Conversion of glucokinase to an enzyme with high affinity for glucose. Diabetes 49: 195–201.[Abstract]

Wilson, J.E. 2003. Isozymes of mammalian hexokinase: Structure, subcellular localization and metabolic function. J. Exp. Biol. 206: 2049–2057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zelent, D., Najafi, H., Odili, S., Buettger, C., Weik-Collins, H., Li, C., Doliba, N., Grimsby, J., and Matschinsky, F.M. 2005. Glucokinase and glucose homeostasis: Proven concepts and new ideas. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33: 306–310.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang, A.J., Bai, G., Deans-Zirattu, S., Browner, M.F., and Lee, E.Y. 1992. Expression of the catalytic subunit of phosphorylase phosphatase (protein phosphatase-1) in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 1484–1490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Bjorkhaug, J. Molnes, O. Sovik, P. R. Njolstad, and T. Flatmark Allosteric Activation of Human Glucokinase by Free Polyubiquitin Chains and Its Ubiquitin-dependent Cotranslational Proteasomal Degradation J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22757 - 22764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. V. Heredia, T. J. Carlson, E. Garcia, and S. Sun Biochemical Basis of Glucokinase Activation and the Regulation by Glucokinase Regulatory Protein in Naturally Occurring Mutations J. Biol. Chem., December 29, 2006; 281(52): 40201 - 40207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. El Omari, S. Liekens, L. E. Bird, J. Balzarini, and D. K. Stammers Mutations Distal to the Substrate Site Can Affect Varicella Zoster Virus Thymidine Kinase Activity: Implications for Drug Design Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 69(6): 1891 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Q. Diep, G. Peng, M. Bewley, V. Pilauri, I. Ropson, and J. E. Hopper Intragenic Suppression of Gal3C Interaction With Gal80 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL Gene Switch Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 77 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ps.051485205v1 14/8/2080    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pedelini, L. Articles by Sanz, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pedelini, L. Articles by Sanz, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?