|
|
||||||||
1 Glutamate Receptor Laboratory, National Neuroscience Institute, S308433, Singapore
2 Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, S117597, Singapore
3 Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322-3090, USA
Reprint requests to: Chian-Ming Low, Department of Pharmacology, MD2 #04-22, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 18 Medical Drive, S117597, Singapore; e-mail: phclowcm{at}nus.edu.sg; fax: +(65) 68737690.
(RECEIVED April 11, 2005; FINAL REVISION May 30, 2005; ACCEPTED May 30, 2005)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Keywords: NR2B NMDA receptor; protein refolding; circular dichroism; dissociation constant; dynamic light scattering
Abbreviations: NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate ATD, amino-terminal domain CD, circular dichroism DLS, dynamic light scattering KD, dissociation constant LIVBP, leucine/isoleucine/valine-binding protein MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight MS, mass spectrometry
Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.051509905.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The NMDA receptor consists of a complex of four or five subunits that include an obligatory NR1 subunit together with the NR2A-D or NR3A-B subunits (Dingledine et al. 1999). The architecture of each NMDA receptor subunit is organized in a modular fashion: an amino-terminal domain (ATD), a ligand-binding domain (S1S2), three transmembrane domains (TM-I, -III and -IV), a re-entrant pore loop (initially identified as TM-II), and a carboxy-terminal domain (Wo and Oswald 1995; Paas 1998). The extracellular ATD, defined by the first ~400 amino acids, exhibits structural homology to a family of bacterial periplasmic amino acid-binding proteins (PBPs), especially the leucine/isoleucine/valine-binding protein (LIVBP) (Nakanishi et al. 1990). Although the ATD of NMDA receptor is not directly involved in ligand binding, it is implicated in subunit assembly (Meddows et al. 2001; Perez-Otano et al. 2001). More importantly, in the NR2 subunits, the ATD forms or influences the binding site of many NMDA receptor modulators such as protons, polyamines, Zn2+, and ifenprodil (Gallagher et al. 1996, 1997;Masuko et al. 1999; Low et al. 2000; Paoletti et al. 2000; Perin-Dureau et al. 2002), and influences receptor desensitization (Krupp et al. 1998; Villarroel et al. 1998; Zheng et al. 2001).
Recently the crystal structure of NMDA receptor glycine-binding domain, S1S2 of the NR1 subunit, has been resolved (Furukawa and Gouaux 2003). The structural data of the NR1 S1S2 domain yielded insights into the mechanisms of activation, inhibition, and specificity by antagonist and partial and full agonists. However, the crystal structure of the modulator-binding ATD of ionotropic glutamate receptors is still unknown. Thus far, only the extracellular glutamate-binding domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 (mGluR1), which also shows structural homology to the bacterial LIVBP, has been crystallized (Kunishima et al. 2000). The lack of crystallographic data for apo- and modulator-bound ATDs of NMDA receptors has limited our understanding of the exact binding mechanisms and the molecular determinants involved in binding various modulators.
The lag in the 3D structural data of ATD modulatory domains is partly attributed to the difficulties in obtaining large amounts of soluble native proteins. In this study, we expressed recombinant ATD of NMDA receptor NR2B subunit (ATD2B) as a 6xHis-tagged fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Despite high-level expression, the protein accumulated predominantly in the inclusion bodies. It is not uncommon for recombinant membrane receptor domains to be insoluble. The initially insoluble ligand-binding S1S2 domain of ionotropic glutamate receptor, GluR2, was successfully crystallized using proteins reconstituted from the inclusion bodies through denaturation and refolding (Chen and Gouaux 1997). We obtained large amounts of reconstituted 6xHis-ATD2B proteins for structural characterization by employing the same strategy of a fractional factorial folding screen used successfully to determine the best refolding conditions for GluR2 S1S2 (Chen and Gouaux 1997).
Here we report the protocol for overexpression of the proximal 367 amino acids preceding the S1 domain of the NR2B subunit in E. coli, one-step purification of Gdn.HCl-extracted 6xHis-ATD2B with a nickel HiTrap chelating metal affinity column, and refolding of 6xHis-ATD2B into soluble protein that binds ifenprodil with a nanomolar KD value as determined by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. This functional 6xHis-ATD2B with a defined conformation will greatly facilitate the screening of putative ligands that bind to this domain. Subsequent site-directed mutagenesis of the 6xHis-ATD2B could also be used to identify the molecular determinants that coordinate ligand binding. This 6xHis-ATD2B is thus a valuable tool for further structural and functional studies of NMDA receptors containing the NR2B subunit.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
CD spectroscopy analyses of Buffer 13-refolded soluble 6xHis-ATD2B
CD spectra of 6xHis-ATD2B in a nondenaturing buffer and a denaturing buffer are shown in Figure 4A
. Far-UV CD spectrum of Buffer 13-refolded 6xHis-ATD2B corresponded to a trough at 216 nm (Fig. 4A
, dotted curve). The relative percentage of
-helices was estimated to be 26.8%, which is in good agreement with the values returned from the Hierarchical Neural Net (HNN) Secondary Structure Prediction (25%) (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/secpred_hnn.pl). The solid curve in Figure 4A
indicated the denaturation of secondary structure in the buffer containing 4 M Gdn.HCl (Buffer E) (Fig. 4A
, solid curve). Since the CD spectra were not measured below 190 nm (see Materials and Methods), estimations of the
-strand and random coil contents were deemed inaccurate and not presented (Johnson 1990). The addition of 5 µM ifenprodil shifted the magnitudes of the spectra shown in Figure 4A
(dashed curve). This shift demonstrated that Buffer 13-refolded soluble 6xHis-ATD2B indeed could bind ifenprodil. Experimentally measured changes in the
-helical contents of 6xHis-ATD2B in the apo- (26.8%) and ifenprodil-bound (27.6%) forms were insignificant compared to the loop contents, which increased from 29.7% (apo-) to 34.7% (ifenprodil-bound).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previously, Chen and Gouaux (1997) had successfully used a fractional factorial folding screen to determine the best refolding conditions for the production of the correctly folded and active S1S2 ligand binding domain of the GluR2 AMPA receptor. We adapted the same refolding matrix screen, and we found that Buffer 13-refolded protein yielded the highest monomer:dimer ratio (2.33) and a very high percentage recovery (92.7%). Notably, Buffers 9 and 12 were ranked the next highest in the monomer:dimer ratios (1.99 and 1.90, respectively). Interestingly, the average hydrodynamic molecular weight of the soluble 6xHis-ATD2B was predicted to be 193 kDa, purporting a tetrameric species, from DLS analyses.
Our CD results suggested that the binding of ifenprodil induced conformational changes mainly at loop regions in the 6xHis-ATD2B protein. This observation is consistent with Asp101 and Phe176 (two critical molecular determinants for high-affinity binding of ifenprodil) being located at the loops linking
3/
3 and
6/
6 as reported by Perin-Dureau et al. (2002; see Fig. 4
therein). The KD value of 127.5±45 nM for ifenprodil binding to 6xHis-ATD2B determined here corroborates with the reported IC50 values for functional NR1/NR2B receptors (Pahk and Williams 1997; Perin-Dureau et al. 2002).
Our study reinforces the conclusion that our 6xHis-ATD2B is folded into a homogenous, biologically relevant conformation, as this 6xHis-ATD2B (1) is soluble in aqueous solution as a monodispersed species, (2) possesses substantial secondary structure, and (3) is able to bind ifenprodil dose-dependently. This study is the first to assign a pharmacological binding constant to the isolated ATD of the NR2B subunit of NMDA receptors (127.5 nM) that is comparable to the corresponding binding constant obtained from [3H]ifenprodil on rat cerebral cortex (36.7 nM) (Schoemaker et al. 1990). In summary, we have presented several lines of evidence that support the conclusion that our soluble 6xHis-ATD2B protein is folded into a functional conformation that is useful for screening ATD-binding ligands and future structural investigations.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-
-methyl-4-(phenylmethyl)-1- piperidine-propanol) hydrochloride (RO 256981) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. 1,2-Diheptanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine was from Avanti Polar Lipids. The 10,000 MWCO Slide-A-Lyzer Mini Dialysis Units (200 µL) and Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassettes (12 mL) were purchased from Pierce. The anti-NR2B amino-terminal rabbit polyclonal antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz, and the anti-6xHis monoclonal antibody was from Clontech. For secondary antibodies, both the goat anti-rabbit and rabbit anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase antibodies were from Sigma-Aldrich. Protein molecular markers were from New England Biolabs. Antibiotics and chemicals of analytical and reagent grade were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Synthesis of ATD2B constructs for protein expression
To facilitate the cloning of the PCR-amplified insert of ATD2B usingNcoI and XhoI on pET30-b(+)EG plasmid, the endogenous NcoI (Ile126Gly128; amino acid numbering starts with first translated methionine) and XhoI (Leu199Glu200) sites located within the ATD of the NR2B cDNA were removed using QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis as reported (Low et al. 2000). The primer pairs were H127Hf-2B, 5'-CATCCTGGGCATCCACGGGGG CTCATCTATG-3' and H127Hr-2B, 5'-CATAGATGAGCCC C-CGTGGATGCCCAGGATG-3'; L199Lf-2B, 5'-GTGGGC TGGGAGCTAGAGGAAGTCCTCCT-G3' and L199 Lr-2B, 5'-CAGGAGGACTTCCTCTAGCTCCCAGAACAC-3'. The nicked double-stranded mutant DNA was transformed into XL2-Blue (heat-shocked 42°Cx45 sec) (Stratagene) or DH10B (electroporation) (Bio-Rad). Colonies were screened using restriction enzymes NcoI and/or XhoI for the abolishment of the corresponding site(s). The mutations were verified by dideoxy sequencing through the region of the mutations. Positive clones were designated as pcDNA1 NR2B(H127H/L199L).
The ATD2B gene encoding the R27R393 amino acid residues of NMDA NR2B subunit was PCR-amplified from the pcDNA1 NR2B(H127H/L199L) plasmid using PfuTurbo polymerase (Stratagene). The sense primer 2B-PRM5 5'-TCCGAATTCCATGGCACGTTCCCAAAAGAGC-3' and anti-sense primer 2B-PRM6 5'-GCGGCCGCTCGAGCCG AGGCCACACATAATAC-3' introduced NcoI and XhoI sites at the 5' and 3' ends of ATD2B (underlined). The PCR reaction volume (100 µL) contained template (20 ng), 200 µg of each primer, 200 µM dNTPs, 1x PfuTurbo Buffer and 5 U PfuTurbo polymerase. The cycling conditions were 95°Cx1 min, 30 cycles of 95°Cx1 min, 55°Cx1 min, and 72°Cx2.5 min with a final 10-min extension at 72°C. The PCR yielded a single and specific amplicon of the predicted size. The amplicon was gel-purified (QIAquick Gel Extraction kit, QIAGEN). The full-length amplicon was sequenced to confirm identity. The NcoI-/XhoI-digested ATD2B amplicon was inserted downstream of the T7 promoter of pET30- b(+)EG expression vector via the NcoI and XhoI sites to create the recombinant pET30b(+)EG-ATD2B plasmid. The amino terminus of ATD2B gene in pET30b(+)EG-ATD2B plasmid was extended to encode the amino acid sequence MHHHHHH and a linker region containing cleavage recognition sites for thrombin and enterokinase during its construction (see Fig. 1
). The authenticity of the full-length cloned inserts in all recombinant constructs was confirmed through restriction digestion and sequencing in both directions. pET30b(+)EG ATD2B plasmid was transformed into BL21-CodonPlus-RIL (Stratagene) competent cells for protein expression.
Buffers
Buffers used followed those detailed in Chen and Gouaux (1997) except for the ligand used: Buffer A: 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF); B: 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mMEDTA, 100 mMNaCl, 0.5% Triton- X-100, 1 mM PMSF; C: 20 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF; D: 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA, 8 M guanidine hydrochloride (Gdn.HCl), 5 mM DTT; E: 20 mM NaOAc, 4 M Gdn.HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mMDTT (pH 4.5); F: 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8), 200 mM sodium sulfate, 10 µM RO 256981, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA; 2: 20 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 200 mM NaCl; 13: 10 mM NaCl, 0.4 mM KCl, 2.0 mM KCl, 2.0 mM CaCl2, 500 mM L-arginine hydrochloride, 20% glycerol, 1% sucrose, 750 mM Gdn.HCl, 1 mM DTT.
Expression of 6xHis-ATD2B
For expression of 6xHis-ATD2B on a 1-L scale, 100 mL of overnight seed cultures was added to 1 L of fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) media and incubated at 37°C until OD600 0.81.0 before induction with 0.5 mM IPTG and incubated at 37°C for another 5 h. The 6xHis-ATD2B induced cells were harvested at 3500 rpmx20 min at 4°C. Cell pellets were washed once with 1xPBS (pH 7.4). The expression of recombinant protein in E. coli was analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
The cell pellet expressing the 6xHis-ATD2B was resuspended in 30 mL of Buffer A supplemented with 0.3 mg/mL lysozyme, 17 µg/mL DNase I, 1 mM PMSF, and 2 mM CaCl2. The cell suspensions were then incubated on ice for 20 min before lysis using sonication (Vibra Cell VC130, Sonics) or passing through the French Pressure Cell (ThermoSpectronic) twice at 15,000 psi on a 40-K cell. The resultant cell lysate was centrifuged at 23,000g at 4°C for 20 min. The crude inclusion bodies were washed with 25 mL of ice-cold Buffer B followed by 25 mL of ice-cold Buffer C, both containing 1 mM PMSF. The washed inclusion bodies were then solubilized in 9 mL Buffer D containing 5 mM DTT with stirring at room temperature for 6 h or until the inclusion bodies became clear. The solubilized solution was clarified by centrifugation at 42,700 rpm at 4°C for 30 min, and the resultant supernatant was diluted with 28 mL ice-cold Buffer E containing 1 mM DTT in a dropwise manner with stirring at 4°C. The resultant solution was centrifuged at 42,700 rpm at 4°C for 1 h. The supernatant containing the soluble and refolded protein was carefully aliquoted out for further investigation or stored at 80°C.
Affinity Ni2+-column purification of 6xHis-ATD2B under denaturing conditions
The solubilized supernatant of 6xHis-ATD2B in Buffer E was loaded into a Ni2+-charged HiTrap HP 5 mL column (Amersham) pre-equilibrated with binding buffer (10 mM Na2HPO4, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 500 mM NaCl [pH 7.4]) and was allowed to bind for 2 h at 4°C. The column was washed with washing buffers containing increasing concentrations of imidazole (20 150 mM). Elution was done using an elution buffer (10 mM Na2HPO4, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 500 mM NaCl [pH 7.4]) containing 300 mM imidazole.
16 refolding matrix screen
First, 200 µL of affinity-purified 6xHis-ATD2B in Buffer E at the starting protein concentration of either 0.1 mg/mL or 1.0 mg/mL was dialyzed against 17 mL of the 16 refolding buffers in Slide-A-Lyzer Mini Dialysis Units at either 4°C or room temperature for 18 h with one change of buffer (Chen and Gouaux 1997). Thereafter, the resultant dialyzed samples were dialyzed against 40 mL of Buffer F at 4°C for 4 h. The final protein samples were centrifuged at 50,000 rpm for 45 min at 4°C. The volume of recovered protein in each refolding condition was recorded, and the percentage of recovery was calculated. Monomeric and dimeric forms of the protein solutions were analyzed using native PAGE (Gallagher 1995) and visualized using silver staining (BioRad). The proportions of the monomers and dimers and the percentage yield of the proteins were then measured using densitometry.
Sample preparation for CD analyses
The affinity-purified protein in Buffer E was concentrated to 0.2 mg/mL (Centricon Plus-70, Millipore). Next, 12 mL of 0.2 mg/mL protein was dialyzed against 1 L of Buffer 2 for 48 h with extensive changes of buffer using a Slide-A-Lyzer 12-mL dialysis cassette (Pierce). It was then refolded in Buffer 13 at 4°C for 18 h with one change of buffer. Thereafter the refolded proteins were dialyzed against Buffer 2 at 4°C for 48 h with multiple changes of buffer. The final protein sample was centrifuged at 50,000 rpm for 45 min at 4°C. To facilitate the comparison of data, all of the protein samples (in final buffer 2) were concentrated to 1 mg/mL using a Vivaspin 2 mL concentrator (Vivascience) for CD characterization and DLS analyses.
CD measurements and secondary structure composition estimation
The CD measurements were performed at 25°C using a Jasco J-715 spectropolarimeter equipped with a 1.0-mm path-length cuvette. The samples were scanned from 190 to 250 nm and accumulated 10 times at a resolution of 0.1 nm with a scanning speed of 50 nm/min and sensitivity of 200 mdeg. All of the CD data are expressed as molar ellipticity. The protein secondary structures were estimated using the software J-700 for Windows Secondary Structure Estimation, version 1.10.02 (Jasco Corp.). Due to the lack of a cuvette with path length 0.1 mm and the high NaCl concentration in final Buffer 2 (exceeding the manufacturers recommendation of 100 mM NaCl), no CD was recorded below 190 nm, and hence
-strand and random coil contents were not determined experimentally.
Modulator binding assay determined by CD
Increasing amounts of ifenprodil were added in small aliquots from stock solutions to 350 µL of protein solution and were allowed to bind for 35 min at room temperature. The CD spectra of the protein in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of ifenprodil (0.015 µM) were recorded. The final change of assay volume was <3%. Duplicates were obtained per batch of induced/refolded 6xHis-ATD2B. Dose-titrations of ifenprodil binding to 6xHis-ATD2B were determined in two separate batches of induced/refolded proteins.
DLS measurements
DLS measurements were made with a DynaPro instrument (Protein Solutions). Each sample was centrifuged for 20 min at 13,200 rpm before being aliquoted into the 12 µL-quartz cuvette of path length 1.5 mm. Measurements were made in duplicate at 25°C for each sample. The hydrodynamic molecular weights were calculated using Dynamic V5 software (Protein Solutions).
Measurement of protein concentration
The protein concentration of purified 6xHis-ATD2B was determined by the Bradford protein assay and the absorbance at 280 nm (GeneQuant Pro, Amersham Biosciences) using an extinction coefficient (
280=60,430 M1cm1) calculated from the amino acid sequence using the ProtParam Web site (http://tw.expasy.org/tools/protparam.html).
SDS-PAGE, immunoblotting, densitometry, and mass spectrometry
The proteins were separated by denaturing SDS-PAGE according to the method of Laemmli, using a Hoefer Mighty Small Vertical Electrophoresis System. They were analyzed on 15% polyacrylamide gels stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. For Western blotting, the proteins were electrophoresed and transferred to nitrocellulose or PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk and subsequently probed with either anti-ATD2B (1:500 dilution) or anti-6xHis (1:10,000 dilution) primary antibody. Detection of the primary antibody was performed with antirabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (1 mg/mL) followed by ECL Plus Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Pharmacia). Densitometric analysis was done using the Syngene Multi Genius Bio Imaging System. The relative band intensity was analyzed using Gene Tools software (version 3.05). The MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed using Voyager DE-STR (Applied Biosystems) to determine the molecular weight of 6xHis-ATD2B. In addition, 0.5 µg of protein was desalted using Zip TipC4 pipette tips (Millipore) before the MS analysis. A MALDI-TOF/TOF MS analysis was performed to obtain the masses and sequences of the trypsin-digested peptides. Here, 0.5 µg of 6xHis-ATD2B was digested using 0.25 µg of trypsin and analyzed using the 4700 Proteomic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Both the molecular weight of the protein and the sequences of the trypsin-digested peptides were analyzed using Data Explorer software. Amino-terminal sequencing (Midwest Analytical) was performed using protein sequencers Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems.
Data analysis
The shift in ellipticity of the CD spectra at 219.6 nm (where the signal change on ifenprodil binding was maximal) was calculated. The experimental data were analyzed by nonlinear curve fitting (GraphPad Prism).
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., and Traynelis, S.F. 1999. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 51: 761.
Dirnagl, U., Iadecola, C., and Moskowitz, M.A. 1999. Pathobiology of ischemic stroke: An integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 22: 391397.[CrossRef][Medline]
Furukawa, H. and Gouaux, E. 2003. Mechanisms of activation, inhibition and specificity: Crystal structures of the NMDA receptor NR1 ligand-binding core. EMBO J. 22: 28732885.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gallagher, S. 1995. Electrophoresis. In Current protocols in protein science (ed. J.E. Coligan), pp. 10.3.4. Wiley, New York.
Gallagher, M.J., Huang, H., Pritchett, D.B., and Lynch, D.R. 1996. Interactions between ifenprodil and the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 96039611.
Gallagher, M.J., Huang, H., Grant, E.R., and Lynch, D.R. 1997. The NR2B-specific inter-actions of polyamines and protons with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 2497124979.
Johnson, W.C.J. 1990. Protein secondary structure and circular dichroism: A practical guide. Proteins 7: 205214.[CrossRef][Medline]
Krupp, J.J., Vissel, B., Heinemann, S.F., and Westbrook, G.L. 1998. N-terminal domains in the NR2 subunit control desensitization of NMDA receptors. Neuron 20: 317327.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kunishima, N., Shimada, Y., Tsuji, Y., Sato, T., Yamamoto, M., Kumasaka, T., Nakanishi, S., Jingami, H., and Morikawa, K. 2000. Structural basis of glutamate recognition by a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor. Nature 7: 971977.
Lee, J.M., Zipfel, G.J., and Choi, D.W. 1999. The changing landscape of ischemic brain injury mechanisms. Nature 399: A7A14.[Medline]
Low, C.-M., Zheng, F., Lyuboslavsky, P., and Traynelis, S.F. 2000.Molecular determinants of coordinated proton and zinc inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate NR1/NR2A receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 1106211067.
Masuko, T., Kashiwagi, K., Kuno, T., Nguyen, N.D., Pahk, A.J., Fukuchi, J., Igarashi, K., and Williams, K. 1999. A regulatory domain (R1- R2) in the amino terminus of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: Effects of spermine, protons, and ifenprodil, and structural similarity to bacterial leucine/isoleucine/valine binding protein. Mol. Pharmacol. 55: 957969.
Meddows, E., Le Bourdelles, B., Grimwood, S., Wafford, K., Sandhu, S., Whiting, P., and McIlhinney, R.A. 2001. Identification of molecular determinants that are important in the assembly of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 1879518803.
Meldrum, B.S., Akbar, M.T., and Chapman, A.G. 1999. Glutamate receptors and transporters in genetic and acquired models of epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 36: 189204.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakanishi, N., Schneider, N.A., and Axel, R. 1990. A family of glutamate receptor genes: Evidence for the formation of heteromultimeric receptors with distinct channel properties. Neuron 5: 569581.[CrossRef][Medline]
Obrenovitch, T.P. and Urenjak, J. 1997. Is high extracellular glutamate the key to excitotoxicity in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 14: 677 698.[Medline]
Paas, Y. 1998. The macro- and microarchitectures of the ligand-binding domain of glutamate receptors. Trends Neurosci. 21: 117125.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pahk, A.J. and Williams, K. 1997. Influence of extracellular pH on inhibition by ifenprodil at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Neurosci. Lett. 225: 2932.[CrossRef][Medline]
Paoletti, P., Perin-Dureau, F., Fayyazuddin, A., Le Goff, A., Callebaut, I., and Neyton, J. 2000. Molecular organization of a zinc binding N-terminal modulatory domain in a NMDA receptor subunit. Neuron 28: 911925.[CrossRef][Medline]
Perez-Otano, I., Schulteis, C.T., Contractor, A., Lipton, S.A., Trimmer, J.S., Sucher, N.J., and Heinemann, S.F. 2001. Assembly with the NR1 subunit is required for surface expression of NR3A-containing NMDA receptors. J. Neurosci. 21: 12281237.
Perin-Dureau, F., Rachline, J., Neyton, J., and Paoletti, P. 2002. Mapping the binding site of the neuroprotectant ifenprodil on NMDA receptors. J. Neurosci. 22: 59555965.
Schoemaker, H., Allen, J., and Langer, S.Z. 1990. Binding of [3H]ifenprodil, a novel antagonist, to a polyamine-sensitive site in the rat cerebral cortex. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 176: 249250.[CrossRef][Medline]
Villarroel, A., Regalado, M.P., and Lerma, J. 1998. Glycine-independent NMDA receptor desensitization: Localization of structural determinants. Neuron 20: 329339.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wo, Z.G. and Oswald, R.E. 1995. A topological analysis of goldfish kainite receptors predicts three transmembrane segments. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 20002009.
Zheng, F., Erreger, K., Low, C.-M., Banke, T., Lee, C.J., Conn, P.J., and Traynelis, S.F. 2001. Allosteric interaction between the amino terminal domain and the ligand binding domain of NR2A. Nat. Neurosci. 4:894901.[CrossRef][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Erreger and S. F. Traynelis Zinc inhibition of rat NR1/NR2A N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors J. Physiol., February 1, 2008; 586(3): 763 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |