|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 DuPont Crop Protection, Stine-Haskell Research Center, Newark, Delaware 19711, USA
2 Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461-1602, USA
(RECEIVED January 8, 2007; FINAL REVISION February 15, 2007; ACCEPTED February 15, 2007)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Keywords: mevalonate kinase; GHMP kinase; allosteric inhibitor; antimicrobial target; diphosphomevalonate; Streptococcus pnuemoniae; crystal structure; mevalonate deficiency
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This report presents the crystal structure of mevalonate kinase from S. pneumoniae with the allosteric inhbitor, DPM, bound to the enzyme. The structure reveals a SpMK dimer with one molecule of DPM bound at each of the two active-site clefts. Structural comparisons of SpMK with other members of the GHMP kinase superfamily suggest that DPM binds as expected for a partial bisubstrate analogmevalonate linked to the
,
-pyrophosphoryl group of ATP. The comparisons also suggest structural divergence between eubacterial and eukaryotic MKs that might ultimately facilitate structure-based antibacterial drug design. Critical active-site residues that contact the mevalonate and pyrophosphate substructures of the inhibitor are discussed with regard to their functional relevance in human disease and their contributions to catalysis.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
+
domains, each comprising approximately half of the primary sequence. A structure-based sequence alignment of SpMK and other members of the GHMP kinase family is shown in Figure 1B, which highlights the motifs, secondary structural elements, and residues that are discussed throughout the text (Fig. 1B). The N-terminal domain is composed of two 310-helices (
1,3) and an elongated, antiparallel, six-stranded
-sheet (
16) that partially encloses an arclike four-helix bundle (
2,4,5,6) (Fig. 1A). The C-terminal domain is organized into a four-stranded antiparallel
-sheet (
710) flanked by two
helices (
10,11) and the helical bundle. Three adjacent helical elements (
79) coalesce to form a sharp apex that overhangs a
-platform composed of the last four strands of the N-terminal
-sheet (
1,2,5,6).
|
5/6) and two helices (
1 and
5); the C-terminal domain interface is defined by the interactions of two loops (
1/
2 and
5/
6) situated at the apex of the domain. A helical hairpin that generates a slightly acute angle between
7 and
8 within the C-terminal domain enables additional, interhelical interactions with
2 and
5 near the surface of the interface.
The DPM-binding site
Given that DPM binds tightly to SpMK (Kd = 500 nM) with a stoichiometry of 1 DPM per dimer, that its binding causes changes in the fluorescence of the protein (which is not observed upon binding of ATP and/or mevalonate), and that DPM is a noncompetitive inhibitor versus either ATP or mevalonate, we were surprised to find inhibitor density (Fig. 2A) exclusively at the active site of each monomer (Andreassi et al. 2004). The only crystals obtained from more than 3000 crystallization conditions (including attempts to drive DPM from the active site of SpMK using high [tens of millimolar] concentrations of mevalonate and AMPPNP) were those in which DPM was bound at the active site of the enzyme. The structural findings predict a stoichiometry of two DPM per dimer and that DPM will compete with mevalonate and ATP individually. Thus, the structural implications are at odds with the thermodynamic and kinetic studies of DPM binding. It is not surprising that DPM binds at the active site, and very weak binding would have been missed in the solution-phase studies. It is plausible that the crystal packing interactions have "trapped" a form of the DPM·SpMK complex that rarely presents in solution. This interpretation, which reconciles the crystallographic and solution-phase data sets, is consistent with the atypical ATP-binding loop conformation seen in the DPM-bound complex (see below).
|
DPM is situated near the dimer interface in a hydrophobic, interdomain cleft that widens from 7 Å to 16 Å as it approaches the solvent exterior. The mevalonate portion of the inhibitor is cradled in a depression formed by a
-platform (
5/6), the N termini of the
4/6-helices, and a short 310-helix (
1) (Fig. 1A). The pyrophosphoryl group of DPM is positioned at the amino terminus of the
4-helix and lies within its positive dipole. The innermost region of the cleft, which is covered along 40% of its length by residues located in the loop between
7 and
7 and the first two turns of the
7-helix, forms a lid that partially shields DPM from solvent and contributes additional stabilizing contacts to both the mevalonate and pyrophosphoryl moieties. The DPM-binding site also contains a Mg2+ ion that is coordinated by two nonbridging oxygen atoms of the DPM pyrophosphoryl group, a water molecule, and side-chain oxygens of Asp135 and Ser92 (Fig. 2A,B). The amide proton of Ser92, an invariant residue among GHMP kinases, forms a hydrogen bond with the
-phosphoryl oxygen of DPM. The importance of proper active-site coordination of Mg2+ is underscored by the 105-fold decrease in catalytic efficiency that results from substitution of a hydrogen atom for the Ser92 hydroxyl group that is coordinated to Mg2+ in the human MVK (Cho et al. 2001).
The conformation of DPM-bound SpMK
The "closed" juxtaposition of the N- and C-terminal domains in the DPM-bound SpMK structure resembles that seen in ternary complexes of other GHMP kinase family members and differs markedly from the apo- and nucleotide-bound binary-MK structures. Thus, active-site closure appears to be linked either to mevalonate binding or to binding of the second substrate into the active site. Comparison of the Sp and rat mevalonate kinase structures reveals that the empty mevalonate-binding pocket in the rat structure is open and poised to accept the ligand (Fu et al. 2002). Movement from the open to closed form, as assessed by conformational modeling (described below), involves a hingelike movement of the N- and C-terminal domains (Fig. 2C) that positions the
1 and
7 helices of SpMK over the binding cleft, thereby shielding the substrate from solvent and placing the conserved mevalonate-binding residues (His20 [Motif I], Val22 and Val23 [
1], and Thr175 and Ile179 [
7]) into contact with DPM (Fig. 2D). Notably, similar conformational changes are seen when comparing liganded and nonliganded forms of other members of the GHMP kinase superfamily (Krishna et al. 2001). To gain further insight into the structural changes that produce the domain shift, SpMK was aligned individually with other GHMP kinase structures using an algorithm that allows the SpMK domains to move to achieve optimal superposition (FATCAT) (Ye and Godzik 2003). The native and FATCAT-generated SpMK structures were then compared with DynDom (Hayward and Berendsen 1998) to quantitatively assess the structural change associated with this transition. The closure is described well by a 30° rigid-body rotation that pivots about an interdomain hinge centered between Leu156 and Glu157 (Fig. 2C).
The ATP-binding pocket
The N termini of GHMP kinase superfamily members harbor an ATP-binding consensus sequence known as Motif II (-PXGXGLGSSAA-), which forms a large, ordered oxyanion hole that acts as an electropositive nest for the triphosphate tail of ATP (Figs. 1B, 2E). A survey of the superfamily structures reveals that the Motif II loop conformations of the binary (ATP-bound) and unliganded complexes are virtually identical, suggesting that the loop does not rearrange upon nucleotide binding (Fig. 2E). In the SpMK structure, the XGX subsection of Motif II (i.e., E85KR) exhibits side-chain disorder and was modeled as alanine. Furthermore, the structure is completely disordered over a small stretch of residues (SAIP84) that lie immediately upstream of Motif II in a conserved
-strand that interacts with the adenine ring of ATP in other family members. It is interesting to note that the disordered serine residue (Ser81) is invariant in the MK family and interacts directly with adenine N6. Thus, it appears that the absence of the nucleotidyl moiety results in a disordering of the residues that would otherwise interact with it. Remarkably, the E85KRGMGS segment of Motif II, which presents a geometrically well-defined set of peptidic hydrogens to the nucleotide triphosphate in other GHMP kinases, is organized in SpMK into a 310-helix that has retracted to the roof of the ATP-binding cleft (Fig. 2E). The final three residues of the SpMK ATP-binding loop (S92AA) faithfully assume the standard GHMP kinase Motif II fold, and position the catalytically essential Ser92 hydroxyl in contact with the Mg2+ cofactor in a fashion identical to that observed in the rat MK structure.
Situated in the N-terminal domains of SpMK·DPM and RnMK·ATP is a conserved core of residues that interact with the ATP tripolyphosphate chain and its associated Mg2+ ion. The C
-backbones of these structures superpose well (RMSD = 0.68) and reveal that the Mg2+-polyphosphate chains of ATP and DPM overlap and exhibit nearly identical interactions with the conserved N-terminal nucleotide-binding core (Fig. 2F). Notably, the
-phosphoryl group of DPM seems to interact with a subsection of the binding pocket (in particular, the highly conserved Lys13, which otherwise interacts with the
-phosphoryl group of ATP; Andreassi and Leyh 2004; Potter et al. 1997). Thus, the pyrophosphoryl group of DPM elicits conserved interactions normally associated with the
,
portion of the tripolyphosphate chain of ATP, which, along with the ternary-complexlike configuration of the DPM structure, supports that DPM is acting as a bisubstrate analog.
Human disease relevance
A histidine residue located at an invariant position of the Motif I consensus in the MK (His20) and GLK (His44) members of the GHMP kinase superfamily is mutated in several heritable human diseases whose origins trace to substantial losses in binding affinity for the nonnucleotidic substrate of either MK (hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome; Houten et al. 1999) or GLK (galactosemia). The structure of the ATP·GLK·galactose complex has been determined, and the interaction of the conserved histidine (His44) with galactose has been described (Thoden et al. 2005); however, the structure of mevalonate bound to MK is not yet available. In the current DPM-bound MK structure, DPM is positioned precisely as expected for a
-phosphoryl group acceptor in a GHMP kinase; thus, it appears to provide an excellent model for understanding the interactions between the acceptor and the disease-linked His20 in SpMK. His20, a unique Ramachandran outlier, presents in a loop between
1 and the
1 310-helix in a conformation that both recognizes the C3-hydroxyl of DPM (through a hydrogen bond to the His20 amide proton) and interacts directly with the C3-methyl group that is situated in a hydrophobic pocket defined primarily by the His20 side chain (Fig. 2A,D). Interestingly, His44 (GLK) and His20 (MK) contribute virtually identical atomic contacts to the similar substructures of otherwise dissimilar substrates (i.e., the C6-hydroxyl and pyranose-ether fragment of galactose versus the C3-hydroxyl and C3-methyl of DPM).
Residue Thr175 in SpMK is conserved across kingdoms in HSK and MK homologs and exists as a naturally occurring mutation in human MK that results in mevalonate deficiency (Hinson et al. 1999). Thr175 is located at the N-terminal edge of the
7-helix, or "mobile helix" (Andreassi and Leyh 2004), whose movement places this residue in contact with both substrates upon formation of the ternary complex (Krishna et al. 2001). In SpMK, the Thr175 hydroxyl hydrogen interacts directly with the nonbridging,
-phosphate oxygen of DPM and less directly with the bridging oxygen, and the C
-methyl of Thr243 is in van der Waals contact with the isopentanyl moiety of mevalonate (Fig. 2A,D). Similarly, the Thr183 equivalent in the HSK ternary complex contributes a hydrogen bond to the
-phosphate of the ATP analog, AMPPNP, and the C
-methyl interacts loosely with homoserine. Initial-rate studies demonstrate a clear role for the conserved threonine in the steady-state substrate recognition and turnover of MKthe Thr243Ala mutation in the human isozyme increases Km for both mevalonate and ATP (40- and fivefold, respectively) and causes a twofold decrease in kcat (Cho et al. 2001).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Data deposition
The atomic coordinates for mevalonate kinase in complex with disphosphomevalonate have been deposited with PDB accession code 2OI2.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.072755707.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Andreassi 2nd, J.L., Dabovic, K., and Leyh, T.S. 2004. Streptococcus pneumoniae isoprenoid biosynthesis is downregulated by diphosphomevalonate: An antimicrobial target. Biochemistry 43: 1646116466.[CrossRef][Medline]
Barton, G.J. 1993. ALSCRIPT: A tool to format multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 6: 3740.
Bridy-Pappas, A.E., Margolis, M.B., Center, K.J., and Isaacman, D.J. 2005. Streptococcus pneumoniae: Description of the pathogen, disease epidemiology, treatment, and prevention. Pharmacotherapy 25: 11931212.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brunger, A.T., Adams, P.D., Clore, G.M., DeLano, W.L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Jiang, J.S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N.S., et al. 1998. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54: 905921.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cho, Y.K., Rios, S.E., Kim, J.J., and Miziorko, H.M. 2001. Investigation of invariant serine/threonine residues in mevalonate kinase. Tests of the functional significance of a proposed substrate binding motif and a site implicated in human inherited disease. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 1257312578.
DeLano, W.L. 2002. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. Delano Scientific, San Carlos, CA.
Fu, Z., Wang, M., Potter, D., Miziorko, H.M., and Kim, J.J. 2002. The structure of a binary complex between a mammalian mevalonate kinase and ATP: Insights into the reaction mechanism and human inherited disease. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 1813418142.
Hayward, S. and Berendsen, H.J. 1998. Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 30: 144154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hinson, D.D., Ross, R.M., Krisans, S., Shaw, J.L., Kozich, V., Rolland, M.O., Divry, P., Mancini, J., Hoffmann, G.F., and Gibson, K.M. 1999. Identification of a mutation cluster in mevalonate kinase deficiency, including a new mutation in a patient of Mennonite ancestry. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65: 327335.[CrossRef][Medline]
Houten, S.M., Kuis, W., Duran, M., de Koning, T.J., van Royen-Kerkhof, A., Romeijn, G.J., Frenkel, J., Dorland, L., de Barse, M.M., Huijbers, W.A., et al. 1999. Mutations in MVK, encoding mevalonate kinase, cause hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome. Nat. Genet. 22: 175177.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jones, T.A., Zou, J.Y., Cowan, S.W., and Kjeldgaard, M. 1991. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A 47: 110119.[CrossRef]
Krishna, S.S., Zhou, T., Daugherty, M., Osterman, A., and Zhang, H. 2001. Structural basis for the catalysis and substrate specificity of homoserine kinase. Biochemistry 40: 1081010818.[CrossRef][Medline]
Levitt, D.G. 2001. A new software routine that automates the fitting of protein X-ray crystallographic electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 57: 10131019.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morris, R.J., Perrakis, A., and Lamzin, V.S. 2003. ARP/wARP and automatic interpretation of protein electron density maps. Methods Enzymol. 374: 229244.[Medline]
Otwinowski, Z. and Minor, W. 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276: 307326.
Pilloff, D., Dabovic, K., Romanowski, M.J., Bonanno, J.B., Doherty, M., Burley, S.K., and Leyh, T.S. 2003. The kinetic mechanism of phosphomevalonate kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 45104515.
Popjak, G., Boehm, G., Parker, T.S., Edmond, J., Edwards, P.A., and Fogelman, A.M. 1979. Determination of mevalonate in blood plasma in man and rat. Mevalonate "tolerance" tests in man. J. Lipid Res. 20: 716728.
Potter, D., Wojnar, J.M., Narasimhan, C., and Miziorko, H.M. 1997. Identification and functional characterization of an active-site lysine in mevalonate kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 57415746.
Rohdich, F., Bacher, A., and Eisenreich, W. 2004. Perspectives in anti-infective drug design. The late steps in the biosynthesis of the universal terpenoid precursors, isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate. Bioorg. Chem. 32: 292308.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rohdich, F., Bacher, A., and Eisenreich, W. 2005. Isoprenoid biosynthetic pathways as anti-infective drug targets. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33: 785791.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rubenstein, S. 1987. ChemDraw. Cambridge Scientific Computing Inc, Cambridge, MA.
Terwilliger, T.C. 2003. SOLVE and RESOLVE: Automated structure solution and density modification. Methods Enzymol. 374: 2237.[Medline]
Thoden, J.B., Timson, D.J., Reece, R.J., and Holden, H.M. 2005. Molecular structure of human galactokinase: Implications for type II galactosemia. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 96629670.
Wada, T., Kuzuyama, T., Satoh, S., Kuramitsu, S., Yokoyama, S., Unzai, S., Tame, J.R., and Park, S.Y. 2003. Crystal structure of 4-(cytidine 5'-diphospho)-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase, an enzyme in the non-mevalonate pathway of isoprenoid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 3002230027.
Wilding, E.I., Brown, J.R., Bryant, A.P., Chalker, A.F., Holmes, D.J., Ingraham, K.A., Iordanescu, S., So, C.Y., Rosenberg, M., and Gwynn, M.N. 2000. Identification, evolution, and essentiality of the mevalonate pathway for isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthesis in gram-positive cocci. J. Bacteriol. 182: 43194327.
Ye, Y. and Godzik, A. 2003. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics Suppl 2 19: II246II255.[Medline]
Zhou, T., Daugherty, M., Grishin, N.V., Osterman, A.L., and Zhang, H. 2000. Structure and mechanism of homoserine kinase: Prototype for the GHMP kinase superfamily. Structure 8: 12471257.[Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |