Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 31, 2004, 10.1110/ps.04802904
Protein Science (2004), 13:2651-2664. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2004 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.04802904v1
13/10/2651    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behe, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Snoke, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behe, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Snoke, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues

Michael J. Behe1 and David W. Snoke2

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, USA
2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA

(RECEIVED April 8, 2004; FINAL REVISION June 17, 2004; ACCEPTED June 17, 2004)

Gene duplication is thought to be a major source of evolutionary innovation because it allows one copy of a gene to mutate and explore genetic space while the other copy continues to fulfill the original function. Models of the process often implicitly assume that a single mutation to the duplicated gene can confer a new selectable property. Yet some protein features, such as disulfide bonds or ligand binding sites, require the participation of two or more amino acid residues, which could require several mutations. Here we model the evolution of such protein features by what we consider to be the conceptually simplest route—point mutation in duplicated genes. We show that for very large population sizes N, where at steady state in the absence of selection the population would be expected to contain one or more duplicated alleles coding for the feature, the time to fixation in the population hovers near the inverse of the point mutation rate, and varies sluggishly with the {lambda}th root of 1/N, where {lambda} is the number of nucleotide positions that must be mutated to produce the feature. At smaller population sizes, the time to fixation varies linearly with 1/N and exceeds the inverse of the point mutation rate. We conclude that, in general, to be fixed in 108 generations, the production of novel protein features that require the participation of two or more amino acid residues simply by multiple point mutations in duplicated genes would entail population sizes of no less than 109.

Keywords: gene duplication; point mutation; multiresidue feature; disulfide bonds; ligand binding sites

Abbreviations: MR, multiresidue

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.04802904.


Reprint requests to: Michael J. Behe, Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA; e-mail: mjb1{at}lehigh.edu; fax: (610) 758-4004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Durrett and D. Schmidt
Waiting for Two Mutations: With Applications to Regulatory Sequence Evolution and the Limits of Darwinian Evolution
Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1501 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Bershtein and D. S. Tawfik
Ohno's Model Revisited: Measuring the Frequency of Potentially Adaptive Mutations under Various Mutational Drifts
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2311 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Masel
Cryptic Genetic Variation Is Enriched for Potential Adaptations
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1985 - 1991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
M. Hermodson
Editorial and position papers
Protein Sci., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2215 - 2216.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
M. Lynch
Simple evolutionary pathways to complex proteins
Protein Sci., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2217 - 2225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
M. J. Behe and D. W. Snoke
A response to Michael Lynch
Protein Sci., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2226 - 2227.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The Protein Society.