Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 1, 2005
Protein Science, DOI: 10.1110/ps.051812706
Copyright © 2005 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.051812706v1
15/1/182    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marblestone, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Butt, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marblestone, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Butt, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Comparison of SUMO fusion technology with traditional gene fusion systems: Enhanced expression and solubility with SUMO

Jeffrey G. Marblestone1, Suzanne C. Edavettal2, Yiting Lim2, Peter Lim1, Xun Zuo2 and Tauseef R. Butt2

1 Progenra Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, USA
2 LifeSensors Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, USA

(RECEIVED August 26, 2005; FINAL REVISION October 12, 2005; ACCEPTED October 12, 2005)

Despite the availability of numerous gene fusion systems, recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli remains difficult. Establishing the best fusion partner for difficult-to-express proteins remains empirical. To determine which fusion tags are best suited for difficult-to-express proteins, a comparative analysis of the newly described SUMO fusion system with a variety of commonly used fusion systems was completed. For this study, three model proteins, enhanced green florescent protein (eGFP), matrix metalloprotease-13 (MMP13), and myostatin (growth differentiating factor-8, GDF8), were fused to the C termini of maltose-binding protein (MBP), glutathione S-transferase (GST), thioredoxin (TRX), NUS A, ubiquitin (Ub), and SUMOtags.These constructswere expressed in E. coli and evaluated for expression and solubility. As expected, the fusion tags varied in their ability to produce tractable quantities of soluble eGFP,MMP13, and GDF8. SUMO and NUS A fusions enhanced expression and solubility of recombinant proteins most dramatically. The ease at which SUMO and NUS A fusion tags were removed from their partner proteins was then determined. SUMO fusions are cleaved by the natural SUMO protease, while an AcTEV protease site had to be engineered between NUS A and its partner protein. A kinetic analysis showed that the SUMO and AcTEV proteases had similarKM values, but SUMO protease had a 25-fold higher kcat than AcTEV protease, indicating amore catalytically efficient enzyme. Taken together, these results demonstrate that SUMO is superior to commonly used fusion tags in enhancing expression and solubility with the distinction of generating recombinant protein with native sequences.

Keywords: fusion protein; protease; structural genomics; SUMO; ubiquitin-like protein

Abbreviations: DUB, deubiquitinating enzyme or ubiquitin specific protease/hydrolase • eGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein • IPTG, isopropropyl-{beta}-D-thiogalactopyranoside • MBP, E. coli maltose-binding protein • Ni-NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid • PCR, polymerase chain reaction • SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis • Ub, ubiquitin • Ubl(s), ubiquitin-like protein(s) • ULP, catalytic domain of Ulp1

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.051812706.


Reprint requests to: Tauseef R. Butt, LifeSensors Inc., 271 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355, USA; e-mail: butt{at}lifesensors.com; fax: (610) 644-8616.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. E. Duncan, E. Sarkadi-Nagy, K. Jaworski, M. Ahmadian, and H. S. Sul
Identification and Functional Characterization of Adipose-specific Phospholipase A2 (AdPLA)
J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2008; 283(37): 25428 - 25436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
R. J. Peroutka, N. Elshourbagy, T. Piech, and T. R. Butt
Enhanced protein expression in mammalian cells using engineered SUMO fusions: Secreted phospholipase A2
Protein Sci., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 1586 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
C.-D. Lee, H.-C. Sun, S.-M. Hu, C.-F. Chiu, A. Homhuan, S.-M. Liang, C.-H. Leng, and T.-F. Wang
An improved SUMO fusion protein system for effective production of native proteins
Protein Sci., July 1, 2008; 17(7): 1241 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
B. Nicholson, C. A. Leach, S. J. Goldenberg, D. M. Francis, M. P. Kodrasov, X. Tian, J. Shanks, D. E. Sterner, A. Bernal, M. R. Mattern, et al.
Characterization of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like-protein isopeptidase activities
Protein Sci., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1035 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by The Protein Society.