Protein Science Sheba protein
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 27, 2007
Protein Science, DOI: 10.1110/ps.073138508
Copyright © 2007 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.073138508v1
17/1/54    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Altman, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Altman, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Robust recognition of zinc binding sites in proteins

Jessica C. Ebert1 and Russ B. Altman1,2

1 Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
2 Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

(RECEIVED August 3, 2007; FINAL REVISION September 27, 2007; ACCEPTED September 28, 2007)

Metals play a variety of roles in biological processes, and hence their presence in a protein structure can yield vital functional information. Because the residues that coordinate a metal often undergo conformational changes upon binding, detection of binding sites based on simple geometric criteria in proteins without bound metal is difficult. However, aspects of the physicochemical environment around a metal binding site are often conserved even when this structural rearrangement occurs. We have developed a Bayesian classifier using known zinc binding sites as positive training examples and nonmetal binding regions that nonetheless contain residues frequently observed in zinc sites as negative training examples. In order to allow variation in the exact positions of atoms, we average a variety of biochemical and biophysical properties in six concentric spherical shells around the site of interest. At a specificity of 99.8%, this method achieves 75.5% sensitivity in unbound proteins at a positive predictive value of 73.6%. We also test its accuracy on predicted protein structures obtained by homology modeling using templates with 30%–50% sequence identity to the target sequences. At a specificity of 99.8%, we correctly identify at least one zinc binding site in 65.5% of modeled proteins. Thus, in many cases, our model is accurate enough to identify metal binding sites in proteins of unknown structure for which no high sequence identity homologs of known structure exist. Both the source code and a Web interface are available to the public at http://feature.stanford.edu/metals.

Keywords: zinc; functional annotation; metal binding sites; function prediction; structural bioinformatics


Reprint requests to: Russ B. Altman, Departments of Bioengineering and Genetics, 318 Campus Drive, Clark Center S170, MC: 5444 Stanford, CA 94305-5444, USA; e-mail: russ.altman{at}stanford.edu; fax: (650) 723-8544.

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.073138508.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by The Protein Society.